Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LM7 need help picking parts for 500+ hp N/A build.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2015, 02:38 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I just don't think that the 383 is the proper choice for the OP's stated goals. His original power goals were a little over optimistic for a 5.3L, but the OP has already shown that he is willing to settle on a more realistic power goal... So throwing another liter of displacement at it, via a $2000 stroker kit and another $1000 in machining labor just doesn't seem necessary when he clearly states that this is to be done on a budget.

He can do a head/cam/intake on the stock lm7 shortblock, and achieve the more realistic 400's the OP brought up in post #3...

If he wants more after the h/c/i, there's absolutely nothing stopping him from adding displacement later... And he will have a better top end to support the extra cubes if he does decide to bore/stroke it.
DavidBoren is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 09:34 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
imma_stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Country
Posts: 1,155
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Ah missed the part that he is willing to lower his target hp.

In that case, the crank and rods in the motor can be used again. Get some LS1 spec pistons and have the block bored to match them. Have those 243s refreshed with better valvetrain, clean up castings if necessary. Then a custom cam for your truck.
imma_stocker is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 11:04 AM
  #23  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Again, why involve the possibility of paying money to potentially destroy the block? Why pay money to add displacement, at all, when the unmolested shortblock that the OP already has is plenty capable of producing the power he desires?

To the OP: Everyone sure is willing to spend your money for you, man.
DavidBoren is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 02:58 PM
  #24  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidBoren
Again, why involve the possibility of paying money to potentially destroy the block? Why pay money to add displacement, at all, when the unmolested shortblock that the OP already has is plenty capable of producing the power he desires?

To the OP: Everyone sure is willing to spend your money for you, man.
It is going into a truck, so the extra torque from 20 more cubic inches and the added compression will be really nice. Using an OEM rotating assembly wouldn't cost very much and will be a great bang for the buck, especially compared to something like a pair of Cometic head gaskets...

Since the engine is already taken apart, it's a good time to do it anyways and start with a completely fresh engine.
KCS is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 03:32 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
 
DavidBoren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,189
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I'm not going to argue that more displacement would be beneficial, especially in a truck. But the lm7 shortblock is a very robust and capable platform that could be rebuilt in its original glory for much cheaper than getting it machined for ls1/6 pistons. And it is plenty capable of reaching the OP's goals with its original displacement and a typical h/c/i swap, with absolutely no risk of hitting water during the overbore and ruining the block.

Would you rather have a 5.7 with stock truck heads, or a 5.3 with stage two cnc ported heads?

Plus, you could take the money you didn't spend on having your block bored, and spend it on some cometic head gaskets.
DavidBoren is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 03:37 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
imma_stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Country
Posts: 1,155
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

I don't trust an engine pulled 5 years ago. That alone requires full disassembly and a hot tank bath to flush rust, spiders, critters, dried sludge, and anything else in the galleys. Getting bores punched out is pretty cheap considering it needs machine work anyways.

Use the crank and rods in there now or use the same crank with gen4 rods and ls1 spec pistons. No power adder means hyper pistons will be fine, forged anything will be a waste of money.
imma_stocker is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 06:02 PM
  #27  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 63 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bigo181979
Ok I am a complete noob on motor building so please take it easy on me.

I manage a body shop and one of my mechanics in our GM service shop said he would be happy to put my engine together for me. I already have a 5.3L LM7 engine out of a 2002 Chevy Silverado. It had a 109K miles on it and ran fine when I pulled 5 years ago and has been sitting on an engine stand since.

My goal for this motor is to be in the 450-550hp range naturally aspirated for of course the least amount of money possible. I am going to be putting this into a 68 short wide bed chevy truck I am currently restoring as a dedication to my brother who just passed away in February.

I would like to maintain the fuel injection and have an engine that is reliable with good street manors as I plan to cruise this truck plenty and drive it to the shows.

So what is the most common and economical way to achieve my goals, remember I work at a GM dealership so I get employee pricing on GM parts, but other then that fact I don't care what brand as long as they are of reputable quality.
Originally Posted by bigo181979
Thanks for the info. I am not looking to go crazy wild on the build or super expensive. I am looking for best bang for the buck and a reliable motor that i can light the tires up with every once in a while. It's gonna be a cruiser but I want enough power to light the tires up of I'm feeling frisky lol.

So it sounds like 400's is a more realistic goal for what I want to do...
I you want to have something that will light the tires on demand and maintain a reasonable budget, then a higher stall torque converter is the key component. If you want to have a ton of fun and not break the bank, just get a cam, headers, free flowing exhaust and a 3500 stall converter. You will be able to punish the tires at will and it will get down the road pretty good too.

Now you just have to decide how rowdy of an idle you want the truck to have and what rear axle gear you have or need and then you can select your camshaft.
speedtigger is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 03:23 AM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
I think the best bang for the buck would be to just bore the cylinders to 3.898" and drop in a stock LS1/6 rotating assembly. Put a decent 22x/23x size cam in there and let it eat. With an LS6 intake and some decent headers, you would be around 400whp/400ft-lbs.
would an asa cam 226/236 be ideal for a l33 or flat top 5.3 with 799s, went to the machine shop for my 370" build, if my cylinder walls look good I'd like to stay away from the machine shop and see if I can swap out to 4.8s, going into an lm7 with 799s.....iron l33
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 06:35 AM
  #29  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
would an asa cam 226/236 be ideal for a l33 or flat top 5.3 with 799s, went to the machine shop for my 370" build, if my cylinder walls look good I'd like to stay away from the machine shop and see if I can swap out to 4.8s, going into an lm7 with 799s.....iron l33
How many more old posts are you going to be bringing up?

And how do you plan on getting a 5.3 to a 370?
JoeNova is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 07:18 AM
  #30  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
would an asa cam 226/236 be ideal for a l33 or flat top 5.3 with 799s,
Maybe. Such a vague question doesn't really have an answer.
KCS is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 09:09 AM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
How many more old posts are you going to be bringing up?

And how do you plan on getting a 5.3 to a 370?
I have a 6.0 for the 370.......I like waking the dead......
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 09:21 AM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
I have a 6.0 for the 370.......I like waking the dead......
**Deleted profanity and inflammatory remarks**

Last edited by KCS; 05-14-2018 at 11:01 AM.
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 09:39 AM
  #33  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
would an asa cam 226/236 be ideal for a l33 or flat top 5.3 with 799s, went to the machine shop for my 370" build, if my cylinder walls look good I'd like to stay away from the machine shop and see if I can swap out to 4.8s, going into an lm7 with 799s.....iron l33
You honestly can't expect anyone to somehow derive you're using a 6.0 from this...
JoeNova is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 11:52 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74


**Deleted profanity and inflammatory remarks**
**Deleted profanity and inflammatory remarks**

Last edited by KCS; 05-14-2018 at 12:16 PM.
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 11:53 AM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
You honestly can't expect anyone to somehow derive you're using a 6.0 from this...
clearly says went to shop for 370 build.....but Yea I coulda been more specific my bad bro
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 12:07 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
clearly says went to shop for 370 build.....but Yea I coulda been more specific my bad bro
why does it bother some of you guys so much when old threads get brought up.....do you have nothing better to do than to monitor my activities on out dated threads and then feel like your doin something by calling me out on it......I'm gonna continue to comment on 5/10/15 yr old threads I also would like to know the out come on some of these disasters. .....I know the original OP may not answer but then again who is to say he/she would be right, so any other suggestions , even 10 yrs later may actually be better........DO YOU FOLLOW ME!!!
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 12:10 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
why does it bother some of you guys so much when old threads get brought up.....do you have nothing better to do than to monitor my activities on out dated threads and then feel like your doin something by calling me out on it......I'm gonna continue to comment on 5/10/15 yr old threads I also would like to know the out come on some of these disasters. .....I know the original OP may not answer but then again who is to say he/she would be right, so any other suggestions , even 10 yrs later may actually be better........DO YOU FOLLOW ME!!!
I can do this all day -KCS

Last edited by KCS; 05-14-2018 at 12:18 PM. Reason: Deleted profanity and inflammatory remarks
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 01:02 PM
  #38  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,139
Received 3,114 Likes on 2,429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74


I can do this all day -KCS
Looks like you might have to... lol
G Atsma is online now  
Old 05-14-2018, 01:19 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 565
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Looks like you might have to... lol
nah....I'm done now.....sorry everybody else for having to wittiness all that! CARRY ON....... ! Till I find another 3+yr thread.....lol, u can pull ur panties out the bunch. ....I know some of you fellas hate me! But we're all here for the same reason (most of us) answers. .......not all of us work at machine shops or ase certified mechanic's. .....we just wanna learn off of others mistakes without ,,,,,,feeling like we're a burden to you because of your losses''''
dawgs74 is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 01:31 PM
  #40  
On The Tree
 
Z28tek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 173
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Lol I got this motor in my Avalanche I think, didn't think they could make 400HP so easily!
Damn thing sure ain't good on gas, even with 70K miles!
Z28tek is offline  


Quick Reply: LM7 need help picking parts for 500+ hp N/A build.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.