Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which heads to go with with 02 Z06 Cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2004 | 11:37 AM
  #21  
Colonel's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 3
From: Troy, AL
Default

Here's the thread... https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...hlight=Stealth
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #22  
Dirty Vegas's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Chicago IL/ Lake Geneva WI
Default

Excellent, I'll check out the sound clip when I get home. Right now I'm leaning towards the 5.3L patriot heads. 1295 shipped to my door with everything to install. Any comments on that?
Reply
Old May 25, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #23  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

You have nothing else to add to your arguement so you have to have the Colonel come in and argue for you? I'd argue with you even further but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to insinuate since Colonel himself runs a nice set of heads and a small cam
Owned by myself, the Colonel, and the owner of the car in question.

Doesn't get much better than that.

He doesn't want another cam, read his first post that he paid $100 for the cam so he's looking for heads that will compliment them. And I also dispute the fact that the Stealth II will make WAY more power than an 02 LS6, I've seen several cars pick up maybe 5rwhp with tuning from Stealth Cam's vs an LS6 cam. If the stealth cam's cost the same as an LS6 cam, I'd go for them. It may be just me, but when I see Stealth Cam's being the same price as a TRex cam I can't help to think that the stealth cams are definitely not the most bang for your buck, unlike the LS6 cam.
See previous posts.



You have nothing else to add to your arguement so you have to have the Colonel come in and argue for you?
Actually its HIS cam in HIS car, so I thought he might be better qualified to talk about it.

I mean, I think the cam was his idea, right?

He doesn't want another cam
Probably because he was listening to people like you.

Seems he's rethinking that now, eh?

I would really like to duplicate that combo if it isn't all kinds of nasty sounding.
It was designed to be quiet/stealthy. Hence the name. Very quiet. Sounds about like stock.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 12:26 AM
  #24  
TD's z's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: TEA
Default

Originally Posted by Linear Velocity
Not to me. Nice heads and a smaller cam will have better driveability, more sleath quality, better emissions compliance, and make more hp/tq through out the power band than a large cam-only setup. People get so hung up on peak numbers with big cam-only setups they forget about a lot of things like that.

I totally agree
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #25  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

Depends on what you call a "smaller cam"

To me, small is anything under 230/230, under .600 lift.

Z06 cam/stock cam is TINY.

And if you're doing a cam, 220/220 is the LEAST duration you'd want to go.

Else, why even bother?

And why bother spending $1500+ on heads and then completely neuter your setup with the Z06 cam.

It does not make sense!
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 11:40 AM
  #26  
Linear Velocity's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, Ca
Default

Z98, If you had looked at the posts with any intelligence. You'll see that at the time I posted my last thread, the original poster had not come out and said that he wanted to change cams. He still had his first post saying "I paid $100 for this cam, looking for some good heads." Then you reply with get a big cam, which doesn't really help him even now as he's considering a bigger cam than the LS6 but still a stealth one. Stealth to me is someone listening to the car cannot tell there's a cam in there. I've heard plenty of 220/220 114 lsa cams and it's tame but anyone can definitely tell there's a cam in there, heck I've heard a 212/218 114 lsa and i can tell. An MTI Stealth II cam or LS6 cam would be much better for stealth, (LS6 will make less power but is a better bang for your buck). So Z98, you still haven't proven anything accept that you can quote multiple people and make yourself look like an idiot.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #27  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

You're like the kid who threatens to take his basketball and go home.

Just because everyone is against you doesn't mean you should pout.

Everyone is wrong sometimes.

Deal with it.

Grow up.

Z98, If you had looked at the posts with any intelligence.
Incomplete sentence.

Then you reply with get a big cam, which doesn't really help him even now as he's considering a bigger cam than the LS6 but still a stealth one.
Do you know any thing about each cam's specs?

And you're calling me the idiot?

Please.

gg runthead
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #28  
Linear Velocity's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Linear Velocity
Not to me. Nice heads and a smaller cam will have better driveability, more sleath quality, better emissions compliance, and make more hp/tq through out the power band than a large cam-only setup. People get so hung up on peak numbers with big cam-only setups they forget about a lot of things like that.
Originally Posted by TD's z

I totally agree

Originally Posted by z98
Just because everyone is against you doesn't mean you should pout.


Reply
Old May 29, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #29  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

Wow you've lost it man game over game over.

There are better much performing cams that are very stealthy.

...make more hp/tq through out the power band than a large cam-only setup. People get so hung up on peak numbers with big cam-only setups they forget about a lot of things like that.
You're a moron. Compare any of the smaller (220-225 range) cams against a Z06 cam, and it loses all throughout the powerband, especially at low end.

So you and your cheerleader vs. every piece of evidence ever presented on this board.

gj

gg

DIE TOPIC DIE
Reply
Old May 29, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #30  
Linear Velocity's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by z98
Wow you've lost it man game over game over.

There are better much performing cams that are very stealthy.



You're a moron. Compare any of the smaller (220-225 range) cams against a Z06 cam, and it loses all throughout the powerband, especially at low end.

So you and your cheerleader vs. every piece of evidence ever presented on this board.

gj

gg

DIE TOPIC DIE
Ok, an LS6 cam is the same as stock below say 3500 rpms. Bigger cams lose a lot of low end torque and gain more at the top end. If you look at my comparison again, I was comparing a big cam-only setup vs. a small cam/heads setup. I'd like to see others post what they think here.

And Z98, no more out of you:


Reply
Old May 30, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #31  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

Okay, lets try this one more time.

First let me say:

Boy, you are wrong!

Deal with this, and you'll be much better off.

Ok, an LS6 cam is the same as stock below say 3500 rpms.
That's pathetic! The stock LS1 cam makes no power!

Bigger cams lose a lot of low end torque and gain more at the top end.
How big are we talking though? Check out any medium sized cam (say smaller than 230+), and it smokes the LS6 cam AT EVERY POINT FROM 2500-7000.



If you look at my comparison again, I was comparing a big cam-only setup vs. a small cam/heads setup. I'd like to see others post what they think here.
Who would waste their money on a small cam/heads setup? I've never seen anyone running that setup, and I'm sure the numbers any people are getting from it are pretty sad for the money they spent.

(remember when you said small cam you are talking about the Z06 cam, remember?)

Not to me. Nice heads and a smaller cam will have better driveability, more sleath quality, better emissions compliance, and make more hp/tq through out the power band than a large cam-only setup. People get so hung up on peak numbers with big cam-only setups they forget about a lot of things like that.
How small are we talking? Do you have a car with the Z06 cam and a nice set of heads? THEN SHUT THE **** UP YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

Most aftermarket cams make more power under the curve than the Z06 cam does. FACT. You cannot argue with this. Please let it go. You are wrong.

And Z98, no more out of you:
Every poster in this thread has you and I'm the one who should get out?
Reply
Old May 30, 2004 | 02:11 PM
  #32  
Linear Velocity's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by z98
Okay, lets try this one more time.

First let me say:

Boy, you are wrong!

Deal with this, and you'll be much better off.



That's pathetic! The stock LS1 cam makes no power!



How big are we talking though? Check out any medium sized cam (say smaller than 230+), and it smokes the LS6 cam AT EVERY POINT FROM 2500-7000.





Who would waste their money on a small cam/heads setup? I've never seen anyone running that setup, and I'm sure the numbers any people are getting from it are pretty sad for the money they spent.

(remember when you said small cam you are talking about the Z06 cam, remember?)



How small are we talking? Do you have a car with the Z06 cam and a nice set of heads? THEN SHUT THE **** UP YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

Most aftermarket cams make more power under the curve than the Z06 cam does. FACT. You cannot argue with this. Please let it go. You are wrong.



Every poster in this thread has you and I'm the one who should get out?

Actually yes I do have a car with an 02 LS6 cam and stage I heads, they aren't installed but I've definitely done my homework. And you are an *** hatt if you think no one runs small cams and heads these days. Again Colonel runs Stage 2 LS6 heads and a tiny 224/220 cam and made 420 rwhp thru an A4. Speed Inc. had a Z06 with ported LS6 heads, stock LS6 cam, 1.85 rockers and made 425 rwhp. So it's clear you're a n00b so I must say:

Reply
Old May 30, 2004 | 05:47 PM
  #33  
Linear Velocity's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, Ca
Default

Oops, just saw this

So Z98:

Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 09:28 AM
  #34  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

Man you've lost it game over game over.

Keep posting stupid pictures, that makes you right

Grow up, please. For your sake. This is just embarassing.

If you spend the money on a set of heads, using a Z06 cam is a waste of money. The examples you are using are aftermarket cams with much higher ramp rates, more lift, and more total duration than a stock Z06 cam.

Again Colonel runs Stage 2 LS6 heads and a tiny 224/220 cam
Yeah a tiny cam with .581 lift? And a z06's (02) specs are:

204/218 .551/.547 116

224/220 .581/581 116/117?(don't know off the top of my head)

This "tiny" cam is way bigger at every point than a Z06 cam.

Care to comment?

I never denied the power of small aftermarket cams. I'm just telling you that the Z06 cam is a waste of money when paired with a nice set of ported heads. Period. End of story. You will find no sane person on this board who agrees with you on this point.

And something tells me you won't be posting your numbers when you get them (if ever )

I bet there are people with TR224 setups who make more power than what you are going to have out of stage 1 heads and a stock (assuming 02) Z06 cam.

Christ you are like talking to a wall.

Lets just see your numbers, okay?

Until then please stop embarassing yourself and be quiet.

No one is saying you can't make any power with a Z06 cam. But to get ported heads then leave 20+ horsepower on the table because you don't want a real cam with similar driving characteristics? Or because you don't want to spend $200 more dollars? That's just stupid.

Kinda like you and your pictures. Save that kinda crap for .com
Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 10:08 AM
  #35  
slik98z's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
From: Northern Va
Default

you guys are hilarious. why argue that the zo6 cam isn't a very good choice? I think everyone has over looked the fact that he claimed he was on a, what seems to be, strict budget. He paid 100 bucks for a cam...if he is installing it himself, he is well on his way to gaining some hp without spending much $$. Some people don't have 300 bones for a "better cam", which is subjective at best anyhow...could he get a "better cam" for 100 bux?

HOWEVER, at the same time the original poster is contradicting himself with respect to his budget by saying he would be ok with paying 1250 bucks for a set of heads. Which if im not mistaken, with ls1 engines, heads aren't a big power producer...but that I'm not positive but I thought that was the information i gathered since I got hooked to this site back in sept. '03. I was under the impression a good bulk of the power for an ls1 is generated from the upgraded cam, and the heads just let the cam do its job better...
so with a ls6 cam, wouldnt' he benefit more from just porting his own stock heads and upgrading to hardened pushrods and some 918 springs? which if he is on a true budget he could swipe those from someone in the for sale section for relatively cheap.

I myself am on a very strict budget. Its to the point that i want a few extra ponies myself, but I dont want to have to get tuning (tuning is very expensive locally and they aren't very knowledgible to boot) so the 02 zo6 cam would fit right into my budget. if its only worth 8 rwhp...considering install is going to run me 100 bucks and a 24 pack of water (oops i mean budweiser), and i could find a set of pushrods and springs for around 150-200 bucks thats somewhere in the ball park of 350-400 bucks. with no other expenses.

for the record, i could save up more and get a 224, but then tuning comes into play (which will run me around 600 bucks and lost work wages to schedule an appointment...considering this is the only car i have), id have to get alot more to run the cam such as ls6 oil pump, double timing chain push rods, springs and retainers most likely, this all drives the price to a point where THEN the cam wouldn't be worth it cause i wouldn't be able to buy gas or nitrous for the next coupleo f months...

so if someone wants to inform me where I am in the wrong, please feel free. Just to me, it seems like a zo6 cam would be beneficial, as I don't really care if someones car is faster than mine cause someone will always be faster, that and i dont have an inferiority complex if someones car is. I just want a little extra umph when im driving my car on a sunny Sunday afternoon with the ttops off listening to classic rock while im on my way to my girlfriends house in the boonies.

just my .02...wella ctually that was more like $2.42 but hell who's word counting here?
Travis
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #36  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

I was under the impression a good bulk of the power for an ls1 is generated from the upgraded cam, and the heads just let the cam do its job better...
Compared to what? The power you'll gain compared to say, an expensive cat-back or LS6 intake is well worth it in the hp:$$$ ratio.

i could save up more and get a 224, but then tuning comes into play
Mail order tune.

Also about your tuning comments, a nice set of heads is probably going to need tuning no matter what cam you're running.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #37  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Buellton CA
Default

next month i am installing the Z06 Cam, Will I be sorry? No, because I don't want to screw with the smog **** around here & I want something that is going to give good power gains for not a lot of money.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #38  
BLWN1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Dan
next month i am installing the Z06 Cam, Will I be sorry? No, because I don't want to screw with the smog **** around here & I want something that is going to give good power gains for not a lot of money.
So how did it turn out? I want to do the z06 cam with some ported 5.3 heads just to keep it sounding stock... extra 40-50 hp should be easy shouldn't it?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #39  
JS's Avatar
JS
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 4
From: Delray Beach, Fl.
Default

I think the guy asked what heads to go with the LS6 cam....
Get back on topic....
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #40  
eb02z06's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 0
From: Waterloo, Ontario
Default

AFR 205's milled down to 60 or 59CC-expect 40rwhp and tones of torque-check the sig.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.