ported 241s or 243s?
I personally cheaped out and ported the 241's. I'm guessing ported 243 would have yielded 15-20hp more. Just my $.02. I'm sure you're fixin to get a load of opinions.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Some companies flow the intake side with an LS6 manifold or pipe or other intake. Flow Nos. not comparable among vendors if different intakes are used.
Last edited by Felix C; Nov 7, 2014 at 04:46 PM.

Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!
COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
https://sdparts.com/details/scoggin-...er/x88958765-2
Those are a pretty good deal for budget heads, you can spend more money on better heads but not every has more money. I'd say you best bang for the buck options would either be the SDPC heads, PRC stage 1 or 2.5 porting service on your 241's, or PRC stage 2.5 5.3 heads.
Short of factory replacement parts I wouldn't buy another set of heads or anything risky (of high value/complexity) from SDPC.
I am just providing my insight based on personal experience.
Ironically, the next time I order new GM parts I will do so from Summit (who will price match SDPC) and they will have the parts drop shipped in from SDPC (confirmed with an LS6 valley cover) anyway - but at least Summit's customer service is sound. I doubt I will ever deal directly with SDPC again for so many reasons.
Kind of like you don't shift gears right at peak hp you rev well past to use the whole top of the power curve.
I am not saying use .650 lift with heads that peak at .580, but I absolutely would consider a .600 lift.
Kind of like you don't shift gears right at peak hp you rev well past to use the whole top of the power curve.
I am not saying use .650 lift with heads that peak at .580, but I absolutely would consider a .600 lift.
Do not wish to beat a dead horse. We agree. Either I was unclear in my previous or you inferred differently. No issue here.







