melling 10295 vs ported LS6
I was not aware the 10295 was not H/V. Ive read the HV can suck the pan dry. But ive heard that mellings are more prone to failures that a ported LS6 pump. Which would you go with? (3.905",rear cam oil galleries have been machined(connecting the two galleries), mild cam,228R possibly, and stock or ported 243's. LS7 lifters.
I haven't seen anything convincing that Melling's pumps are more prone to failure than GMs. Vendor that I bought my pump from sells both and recommended Melling for better all around quality if nothing else.
At the end of the day stock LS6, ported LS6, or 10295 will work fine for most of us.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
None of you guys bother to use the feeler gauges and set clearance on the oil pump around the crank? I have been doing this but can't say it made any difference. Recommended procedure by GM.
Last edited by KCS; Jun 16, 2016 at 02:52 PM.
On the V build, I've just received my crank scraper, windage tray, racing baffle from Improved Racing so I expect to have a lot more oil on the pickup than before. By the time I really hit the track I will probably have an Accusump installed as well but hoping that it will be one of those things I have and don't actually need.







