Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Critique my build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 02:45 PM
  #1  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default Critique my build

I'm looking for an upgrade this summer and this is what I have in mind. The car is my DD so I still want to keep it street able but I want a nice bump across the power band preferably in the low to mid range since I hardly go over 5000 rpms.
Anything else you would add or change? I will be adding a stall too but ill save that for another thread.

TSP 228r cam 112 LSA
PRC 227 heads (still not for sure, any other recommendations?)
F.A.S.T. 92 with NW 92 TB
36lb injectors
Racetronix fuel system(F98)
TSP 1 7/8 headers with catted y
TSP ported oil pump
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
99Bluz28's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 11
From: C. V., Kalifornia
Default

I'd go with small cc heads like 205-215cc heads, and a slightly smaller cam, like the Tick Street Heat Stage 1 V2(225/228 112lsa+3) or another similarly sized cam.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; Apr 26, 2015 at 03:33 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 03:20 PM
  #3  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
Id' go with small cc heads like 210-215cc heads, and a slightly smaller cam, like the Tick Street Heat Stage 1 V2(225/228 112lsa+3) or another similarly sized cam.
any particular reason why?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 03:42 PM
  #4  
99Bluz28's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 11
From: C. V., Kalifornia
Default

"I want a nice bump across the power band preferably in the low to mid range since I hardly go over 5000 rpms."

IMO, Better power below 5k.

Furthermore with a smaller cam you can go with a slightly lower stall TC.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; Apr 26, 2015 at 03:47 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 03:51 PM
  #5  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
"I want a nice bump across the power band preferably in the low to mid range since I hardly go over 5000 rpms."

IMO, Better power below 5k.

Furthermore with a smaller cam you can go with a slightly lower stall TC.
Thanks for that info. I don't ever go to the track(maybe one day) and I want power that I will actually be able to feel and use. What kind of rwhp will that give me?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 09:40 PM
  #6  
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 252
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Default

I agree with 99BluZ on cam recommendation and cylinder head
Size. Combo has ability to add 60+ RWHP with attention to detail.
Switch heads to MMS 220s and MAMOFY that FAST 92 add 80+ RWHP
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 10:51 PM
  #7  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Originally Posted by NAVYBLUE210
I agree with 99BluZ on cam recommendation and cylinder head
Size. Combo has ability to add 60+ RWHP with attention to detail.
Switch heads to MMS 220s and MAMOFY that FAST 92 add 80+ RWHP
I forgot to mention that I'm aiming for 420-440 rwhp. Will that be attainable with my combo?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 12:01 AM
  #8  
squalor's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 3
From: Gulf Shores Ala
Default

Moar compression . and what 99Bluz28 said.
Your in Ca. Don't you have to pass emissions ?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 12:50 AM
  #9  
BBATCAR's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by squalor
Your in Ca. Don't you have to pass emissions ?
I'm curious too... Unless you are not registering the car in CA, the 228 cam usually borders emissions failure in testing. Same goes for LT headers. You can get away with different heads if they visually don't stand out. The 224 cam or less will pass emissions if tuned correctly unless you know someone to pass you.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 12:57 AM
  #10  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Originally Posted by squalor
Moar compression . and what 99Bluz28 said.
Your in Ca. Don't you have to pass emissions ?
I'm in CA but my car is registered in Texas(military) so I'm not worried about emissions.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 01:16 AM
  #11  
Mongoose350's Avatar
Launching!
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 1
From: Dallas Texas
Default

I'm in the same boat, looking into beefing up an LS1. I have recently seen some good reviews on some cam motion cams.

The combo I'm looking at is,
Cam Motion Titan 4 cam w/
AI high comp 241 heads. Seems to be a good combo for a 346,
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 06:38 PM
  #12  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Should I just go with a fast 102/102 setup. I've been thinking of upgrading the fuel rails anyway. Do you think I would pick up much more power?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 06:49 PM
  #13  
HCI2000SS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 20
From: Howell & Fenton MI
Default

Originally Posted by JTtransAM
Should I just go with a fast 102/102 setup. I've been thinking of upgrading the fuel rails anyway. Do you think I would pick up much more power?
Since you already have the 92 it's not worth it IMO
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 10:49 PM
  #14  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Since you already have the 92 it's not worth it IMO
I don't have it, I'm still in the planning phase.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2015 | 12:21 AM
  #15  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

I'd go even smaller on the cam. 222/226 113 with some TFS 205 heads. You'll probably have too much compression with that small cam since the TFS heads are 58cc... but it'd be a torque demon.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 10:32 AM
  #16  
Sales@Tick's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 17
From: Mount Airy, NC
Default

If you plan on installing a camshaft along the lines of what has been mentioned so far, be sure that you plan your stall converter install to occur at the same time as the cam install. You will need to have the stall converter at the same time the cam goes in if you wish to run a cam like has been mentioned in this thread.

The suggestions here are good ones, and if you would like any further recommendations feel free to call our shop.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 05:35 PM
  #17  
JTtransAM's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
If you plan on installing a camshaft along the lines of what has been mentioned so far, be sure that you plan your stall converter install to occur at the same time as the cam install. You will need to have the stall converter at the same time the cam goes in if you wish to run a cam like has been mentioned in this thread.

The suggestions here are good ones, and if you would like any further recommendations feel free to call our shop.
Thanks for the heads up. I was planning on a Yank 3200 or something in that range.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2015 | 05:59 PM
  #18  
JaSSon's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
From: Bridge City, TX
Default

Your on the right track with your build like Martin said the verter will be key along with gear ratio spin that bitch who have out under 5000 grand your shift extension will be above that
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.