Port Match
Bolted up a new set of heads and set my unmodified FAST92 bottom on them to see how the ports matched up. They all look like this. I was thinking if anything it would be the other way around. Is this normal?
I would have thought it'd be the other way around. What heads are those and what are the specs? I know Brian Tooley has always said that port matching the FAST intake to the heads is the ONLY way to go. He doesn't even like to port the FAST intakes without port matching. He said it's a waste of time.
Might be part of the problem. If they get milled a lot your intake may not line up although it's usually shifted the other way so maybe there was something dimensionally different with another casting. The different shapes of the ports have to be adjusted on one or the other
What heads are they?
What heads are they?
I've contacted the manufacturer but haven't received a response. That's why I'm posting here.
So it's a problem? A big problem?
I'm not convinced its a problem. I just don't have experience with a bunch of different builds so I was curious if this is normal. I doubt I'll be pulling the heads so can port them to match the intake.
So it's a problem? A big problem?
I'm not convinced its a problem. I just don't have experience with a bunch of different builds so I was curious if this is normal. I doubt I'll be pulling the heads so can port them to match the intake.
Trending Topics
It is not normal. My 243 heads matched up perfectly to my FAST 102. Can the car work like that. Yes. Will it be the best. No. You'll have air slamming into the lip causing turbulence and limiting flow.
A head porter chooses a shape he wants the port. He knows what shape the FAST is, he designed that port, either you trust him or you don't.
I am not saying this as a blind supporter honestly I don't see me ever using a AFR or Mamo product, but again, you trust him, the community trusts him. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill. It is a little in a corner, not like a whole side or perimeter.
I am not saying this as a blind supporter honestly I don't see me ever using a AFR or Mamo product, but again, you trust him, the community trusts him. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill. It is a little in a corner, not like a whole side or perimeter.
Last edited by 96capricemgr; Sep 4, 2015 at 12:43 PM.
A head porter chooses a shape he wants the port. He knows what shape the FAST is, he designed that port, either you trust him or you don't.
I am not saying this as a blind supporter honestly I find him I don't see me ever using a AFR or Mamo product, but again, you trust him, the community trusts him. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill. It is a little in a corner, not like a whole side or perimeter.
I am not saying this as a blind supporter honestly I find him I don't see me ever using a AFR or Mamo product, but again, you trust him, the community trusts him. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill. It is a little in a corner, not like a whole side or perimeter.
A head porter chooses a shape he wants the port. He knows what shape the FAST is, he designed that port, either you trust him or you don't.
I am not saying this as a blind supporter honestly I don't see me ever using a AFR or Mamo product, but again, you trust him, the community trusts him. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill. It is a little in a corner, not like a whole side or perimeter.
I am not saying this as a blind supporter honestly I don't see me ever using a AFR or Mamo product, but again, you trust him, the community trusts him. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill. It is a little in a corner, not like a whole side or perimeter.
I've spoken with Tony since I made the post and he says all AFR cathedral castings have had that shape since like 2004.
Guys,
Please see my emailed response to the OP which I copied and pasted below in blue (with a few words added for better clarity). FWIW that's the older style 90/92 mm intake and I'm almost positive the 102 has a larger radius build into the corner......either way the comments I make below still apply. As a head designer I'm not going to design a port with sharp corners knowing that adds volume and inefficiency to the design. Also.....FAST intakes aren't the only manifolds that can be bolted up to the heads.....just the more common intakes most read about here.
Hope this clears things up
Scott,
The floor is raised on the AFR and MMS stuff because there is very little airflow on the floor of any intake port and even less on the tall cathedral deal.
It helps reduce the dead area of the port and increase the airspeed where the air is actually moving (roof and center of the port).
The slight lip.....don't even sweat it.....every AFR cathedral since like 2004 has had something similar (a more generous corner radius).
Its a non event cause like I said if you probed the intake port with a pito tube (or any device that can show the movement of air), the port the floor is very inactive and its only a small mismatch anyway.
Also.....air doesn't flow in sharp corners which is the other reason its there.....ideally the intake would have had a larger radius designed into it
If you were to match it perfectly it wouldn't be worth a single HP
Please see my emailed response to the OP which I copied and pasted below in blue (with a few words added for better clarity). FWIW that's the older style 90/92 mm intake and I'm almost positive the 102 has a larger radius build into the corner......either way the comments I make below still apply. As a head designer I'm not going to design a port with sharp corners knowing that adds volume and inefficiency to the design. Also.....FAST intakes aren't the only manifolds that can be bolted up to the heads.....just the more common intakes most read about here.
Hope this clears things up
Scott,
The floor is raised on the AFR and MMS stuff because there is very little airflow on the floor of any intake port and even less on the tall cathedral deal.
It helps reduce the dead area of the port and increase the airspeed where the air is actually moving (roof and center of the port).
The slight lip.....don't even sweat it.....every AFR cathedral since like 2004 has had something similar (a more generous corner radius).
Its a non event cause like I said if you probed the intake port with a pito tube (or any device that can show the movement of air), the port the floor is very inactive and its only a small mismatch anyway.
Also.....air doesn't flow in sharp corners which is the other reason its there.....ideally the intake would have had a larger radius designed into it
If you were to match it perfectly it wouldn't be worth a single HP
__________________

www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!

www.mamomotorsports.com
Tony@MamoMotorsports.com
Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Build it right the first time....its alot cheaper than building it twice!!









