Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Worth the trouble???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 08:55 AM
  #1  
juveteach's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Concord,NC
Default Worth the trouble???

Hey guys,
Building a G-Body wagon in my HS AUTO CLASS with a 5.3L in it.
I wanted to build a little more torque in it so, we have a 01 or 02 LQ4 cam laying around and my students and I are wanting to know if there would be ANY gain at all from swapping this LQ4 cam in our 02 5.3L??
I am kinda thinking that there MIGHT be a little gain on upper RPM's.
But I don't know if it is worth the trouble or not.
Wagon isn't very heavy and i'm still too new at this LS stuff to know if it is a good swap or not, I'm sure someone has done it.

Thanks in Advance for your time reading this.
Anxiously waiting to read responses?

Mike
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 09:53 AM
  #2  
ahritchie's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Originally Posted by juveteach
Hey guys,
Building a G-Body wagon in my HS AUTO CLASS with a 5.3L in it.
I wanted to build a little more torque in it so, we have a 01 or 02 LQ4 cam laying around and my students and I are wanting to know if there would be ANY gain at all from swapping this LQ4 cam in our 02 5.3L??
I am kinda thinking that there MIGHT be a little gain on upper RPM's.
But I don't know if it is worth the trouble or not.
Wagon isn't very heavy and i'm still too new at this LS stuff to know if it is a good swap or not, I'm sure someone has done it.

Thanks in Advance for your time reading this.
Anxiously waiting to read responses?

Mike
Somebody just brought up this article yesterday which specifically answers your question (same cam as LQ9: 196/207 .467/.470 116 right?):

http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...st-comparison/

Yes, it definitely is worth 40 (flywheel) HP at 6500 RPM or 24 HP at 5500 RPM...not too shabby for a stock cam.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 10:10 AM
  #3  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

If anything, I would think it would be a good learning experience for the students.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 11:26 AM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 15
Default

That article should not have published numbers like the 40hp at 6500, because 6500 is beyond where either cam is used. A good resource if you understand it.
Better stated as a peak to peak and average gains
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 12:09 PM
  #5  
juveteach's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Concord,NC
Default

Thanks guys for the info.
I saw that article and that is why I am asking the question.
I figured someone on here has already experienced the swap 1st hand and could give some feedback.
This would be our 2nd swap in class. We finished the 84 Silverado.
It made 340RWHP with just a cam and tune.

Does anyone know what a STOCK 5.3L should make for power with just headers and a tune? I was kinda thinking 280-300rwhp?...how far off am I?

That's why I wanted to do this cam swap to make like 300 at the tires, really perk up this old UGLY wagon.
Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 08:54 AM
  #6  
ahritchie's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Originally Posted by juveteach
Thanks guys for the info.
I saw that article and that is why I am asking the question.
I figured someone on here has already experienced the swap 1st hand and could give some feedback.
This would be our 2nd swap in class. We finished the 84 Silverado.
It made 340RWHP with just a cam and tune.

Does anyone know what a STOCK 5.3L should make for power with just headers and a tune? I was kinda thinking 280-300rwhp?...how far off am I?

That's why I wanted to do this cam swap to make like 300 at the tires, really perk up this old UGLY wagon.
Thanks
That seems very optimistic without full bolt ons.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.