LQ9 Build. Stroker or new heads?
A) Buy the entire rotating assembly with a stroker crank to make my engine a 408. Stick with the stock cast 317 heads with a small porting job.
B) Take the money i would have spent on the new crank and buy a set of L92 heads, go with my stock crank. The guy at the machine shop is trying to shy me away from the L92's to stick with the 317's, he says it will make my engine more street-able and give me more low end torque. Im just going to be ripping around town and not on the strip so this might make sense.
What do you guys think?
Sofar you are giving yourself poor options.
Blindly chasing cubes, blindly chasing flow bench numbers. You are begging to spend too much on mediocre results.
I would leave the shortblock alone and find some 243/799 heads with some porting and FAST. Cheaper than a stroker, way better response than the LS3.
The LS6 makes more power per cube than a LS3......
There are builds on here where people build a 408 and get very underwhelming numbers, but with supremely flat torque curves, they are probably a blast to drive. But then you can go back in later with a top end optimized for your 408 and hit 550.
However for 6K, you won't get to do a great top end and a 408. If you plan to go back in later, it's easier to put a good top end onto a 408 than it is to put a 408 under a good top end.
Third option, for 6K, you could put one of those snail-looking things on to force feed your motor and get 500.
Or you could do a relatively budget build and then spray with laughing gas to get the extra 100-hp when you need it.
Trending Topics
Now it is a fair point that topend can be swapped later if you do a shortblock now, but IMO people jump on the shortblock bandwagon without considering a LQ9 with good heads (ported 243s)and cam should be rollbar territory in just about any car, even old body on frame "big" cars from the 60s to 90s.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Haha alot of guys tell me the power is in the top end but i need to replace half my bottom end anyhow...
I wasn't planning on turbos or spray... The guy at my machine shop tells me up and down to build the thing for torque and not worry too much about loosing out at the top end. Im building the engine for a lowered 1975 chev pick up step side thats just built for the street. No stal or anything like that just something that will be a blast to drive!
You'll probably break your budget a little bit, but not too bad. A 408 will make torque, so don't worry about trade offs.
It stems from the singly minded "no replacement for displacement" crowd. Like all cliches, the phrase should have been axed the first time it was stated. Yes, there was a time when poor head/valve train design & heavy cars made increasing displacement one of the best available options for improvement, but, even then guys new that headers & a cam would wake her up.
Today, a H/C LS1 w/ a stable valvetrain can out power the larger displacement STOCK LS7 (not in TQ, but, in overall HP). TQ is the major advantage of displacement NA. Yes, it's a key component of HP, but, so is RPM. Hmmm, maybe we should coin another cliche; "airflow makes her go," "there's no flow without dough" or "put some thump in your pump." lol, lol... Each equally as lame as "no replacement for displacement."
There are dozens of ways to replace displacement.






