Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Small bore 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 05:20 PM
  #21  
zraffz's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 260
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default

First problem is you are using a micrometer which won't give you the most accurate reading. It will come very close IF you have it perfectly strait and center in the bore.

Secondly, are you sure you have used that 4" ring compressor before because I am willing to bet money on it that if you flip it over 180 degrees, it will fit perfectly! Those compressors are designed with a tapered inside diameter so one side is larger than 4".
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 05:34 PM
  #22  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default




First three bank Matco





Second three bank Matco and these are just at home not at the shop





Ring compressor lip that goes in the cylinder to along the piston and rod assembly!





Lip clearly doesn't fit the damn bore!


Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 05:46 PM
  #23  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Did you try measuring 90 degrees apart?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 05:56 PM
  #24  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default

Yes sir its just a small bore .018 below 4.00 is what i come up with and i measured three different bores the largest was still .012 shy of the 4.00 mark.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 05:58 PM
  #25  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

Within factory specs, nothing to see here.

3.98 is the listed factory bore on the LQ4/9.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:01 PM
  #26  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default

Hey DietCoke where did you fine specs showing the undersize bore being within tolerances? I have always seen slightly over but not under.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:02 PM
  #27  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

3.98 is the listed lq4/9 bore in my gmpp catalog
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:07 PM
  #28  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

Page 266

LQ9 (LQ4)
12572808
Iron
9.240
3.98"


http://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billav...08_Catalog.pdf
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:08 PM
  #29  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default

Gm service manual i have seen say 4.0007-4.0017 I know at one time the early LQ engines were shown to have a 3.98 bore however everybody who tore one down measured it to a 4.00 I am guessing I just have one of the actual 3.98 bores.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:10 PM
  #30  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

3.98 is the rough bore, which is honed/finished to spec from there. If it's straight, there wouldnt be a need to finish it out to 4.

It's also possible it wasnt a production engine and someone built it from a gmpp block as-is without doing a finish hone
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:14 PM
  #31  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default

i plan on pulling it down this weekend to take a good luck at everything and run part numbers! Thanks DietCoke btw you wouldnt be interested in a trade for my 317 heads for your 853 heads would you? I am going to go n/a with this engine!
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:17 PM
  #32  
DietCoke's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 60
From: Richmond Hill, GA
Default

no i already have enough crap laying around, lol. good luck
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 06:20 PM
  #33  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default

Lol thinks what all you got laying around i might could use it!
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 08:23 PM
  #34  
89 formula350's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 509
Likes: 1
Default

I wouldn't be too surprised as the later LS2 block used in the L76 is said to have a 3.988 bore. same casting as the regular LS2 but the finished bore wasn't brought out to a true 4" I guess that means you have more room to clean up any cylinders
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2016 | 08:52 PM
  #35  
Whiskeyboy84's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Converse, Tx
Default

I had heard of them just never ran into one so I always kinda thought it was a myth or GM
Printed the smaller bore for insurance reasons or something because displacement actually plays as role in insurance cost. So glad to be getting some
Good information from others who have seen this before!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.