Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tsunami Cam Setup

Old Apr 20, 2016 | 08:37 PM
  #1  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default Tsunami Cam Setup

Im building my 1st LS1 for a 1990 rx7 I just picked up. The motor is from a 2002 ss w/89k miles, and it will be mated to a t56. I understand a bigger cam is not always better, and that this camshaft is considered to be on the larger side of things. My question is, can a factory bottom end/rotating assembly provide this cam the support it needs to shine with the appropriate bolt ons? At the moment, I am torn between prc 2.5 5.3/243 heads; my gut tells me I will need the compression bump with a 235/240 duration cam, but many on here seem to suggest otherwise. Planning on LT/stock intake port/possible injectors for e85. I'm looking for high 400s-500hp to the wheel...crazy talk? I am not opposed to fly cutting the pistons in order to mill the heads and bump up compression.

Having a hard time sifting through all the input on here

Thanks guys!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 08:25 AM
  #2  
Mercier's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 5
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Yes, I think your numbers are obtainable if everything is just right. Tune included. Light car and stick, that's not really that *big* of a cam in the whole scheme of things. Check your intake. You will want a true LS6 intake or perhaps something better...but the LS6 is far better than the LS1. Some LS1s came with said intake so do your research. Compression is your friend for sure in a N/A setup. The real 5.3s come with a small chamber to start with but those aren't as plentiful so often places like PRC are actually milling down larger heads. Not really a problem per se but if you can find some honest 862s ported you start with about a 62cc chamber and with a very small mill you can get to 11:1 easily and still have plenty of PTV. Maybe PRC sinks the valves to make up for it. IDK. Not beating up on them at all; I hear it is a fine product. Just giving you food for thought. The 862s do need a valve job to install the LS1-sized 2" intake but I am sure any shop would do this automatically.

What are you doing with the car? Where/how often will you drive it? Any pet peeves? That info will help you choose a cam. And just get a custom cam for the same price.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 12:34 PM
  #3  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 13
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

Your bottom end will be fine with that cam, heads, and full-bolt-ons. As long as the tune is good and safe, it won't be an issue. I also agree that you should run as much compression as your fuel will allow given the big cam. Compression will help Band-Aid the loss of power/torque in the low RPM band. If you're going to run e-85 and don't care about fly-cutting, you could really run a high compression if you wanted to.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 01:14 PM
  #4  
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 7
From: Texas!
Default

We don't mill down a larger head and call it a 5.3. That really doesn't make since at all knowing all 5.3 heads have the same chamber. Some 5.3's came with a 243 head but that wouldn't be considered a 5.3 head and would actually be better anyway.

As far as a 243 head, again we don't mill down a different head and call it a 243 either.

Originally Posted by Mercier
Yes, I think your numbers are obtainable if everything is just right. Tune included. Light car and stick, that's not really that *big* of a cam in the whole scheme of things. Check your intake. You will want a true LS6 intake or perhaps something better...but the LS6 is far better than the LS1. Some LS1s came with said intake so do your research. Compression is your friend for sure in a N/A setup. The real 5.3s come with a small chamber to start with but those aren't as plentiful so often places like PRC are actually milling down larger heads. Not really a problem per se but if you can find some honest 862s ported you start with about a 62cc chamber and with a very small mill you can get to 11:1 easily and still have plenty of PTV. Maybe PRC sinks the valves to make up for it. IDK. Not beating up on them at all; I hear it is a fine product. Just giving you food for thought. The 862s do need a valve job to install the LS1-sized 2" intake but I am sure any shop would do this automatically.

What are you doing with the car? Where/how often will you drive it? Any pet peeves? That info will help you choose a cam. And just get a custom cam for the same price.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 06:43 PM
  #5  
nwilson44's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 305
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Default

I am currently running that cam, and I have untouched 243's and bolt ons. With some aftermarket heads such as AFR, Darts, or something from mamomotorsports and a Fast 102 you can do it. My drivability is something I can live with and I can see the potential this cam has even with a stock LS6.

Dont skimp on the heads, and get something that has a good curtian area and get your compression around 11.5+ if possible without PTV issues. Also make sure you get a quality set of springs such as BTR Titanium .660's if possible. I'd stay in the 225-227cc range in the heads to help facility a high port velocity. Dont get too caught up with flow numbers as all of the brands I just mentioned will be somewhat close. Curtain area, port velocity, compression ratio, and valvetrain control are all of upmost importance

The FAST 102 will also be another factor. Last but not least is exhaust. Get you a nice 1-7/8 header and free flowing exhaust.

Good luck and 500 RWHP can be had from a 346 now adays. Just gottta do it right.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 06:56 PM
  #6  
nwilson44's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 305
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Default

May not be a bad idea to put in some Pistons with valve reliefs. You can mill heads more and gives you more ptv and more peace of mind.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 07:19 PM
  #7  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

This is all very helpful, thanks to everyone who replied. The guys at TSP have been so helpful I'm going through them for the majority of the setup. Time to do a little bit more reading before I make the leap.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 07:19 PM
  #8  
Mercier's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 5
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

I am by no means trying to cause a fuss here.. But you are being a good vendor and responding so I am curious on this specific situation. I really thought that you guys used to list an actual set of 2.5 5.3 heads on your website. I recall calling and asking about them, maybe 1.5-2 years ago when I was looking at buying my first set of LS heads. I was told on the phone that since 862s and 706s weren't production parts anymore that I would perhaps get a different casting(243 maybe even?) that you would machine to the same specs as the /PRC 2.5 5.3/ and it would perform the same or better. Now 243 ports and chambers are demonstrably better; no question of that. But when comparing a 64.5cc head to a 61.15cc head, it tells me that to get to the same combustion chamber size, you would have to mill the 243 3.35cc or about .020" is my only point. 243 is better. But for same compression ratio the valve might be closer to the piston and a concern with a big cam.

Do you offer the 2.5 5.3 as a part any longer? I can only find the service for sending your own heads in for that job...so if that's all that is offered now, I kinda understand why my original statement was odd. Maybe I dreamt all of this IDK. Wasn't trying to bash your product or company at all.

Thanks.

Originally Posted by Sales2@Texas-speed
We don't mill down a larger head and call it a 5.3. That really doesn't make since at all knowing all 5.3 heads have the same chamber. Some 5.3's came with a 243 head but that wouldn't be considered a 5.3 head and would actually be better anyway.

As far as a 243 head, again we don't mill down a different head and call it a 243 either.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Apr 30, 2016 | 01:11 PM
  #9  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

figured id update...

I pulled the trigger on a pair of PRC 225 62cc heads and a Tsunami cam on a 111 lsa. I did some research and discovered that my pull out ls1 did in fact come from factory with a ls6 intake (2002 ss); i verified this by examining my intake. Im going to a trusted local engine shop this week to discuss PTV/milling the heads/flycutting my pistons.

At this point, would running the factory LS6 intake be a huge hinderance for my setup? Im planning on 1 7/8 LT, just curious if the intake could keep up.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2016 | 04:58 PM
  #10  
brobinson216's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Default

If you truly are shooting for high 400 dyno numbers bottom line is this in fact. You will need a Fast 92 or 102 with a minimum 42lb injector.

This is not an easy task, mid 450 is more along the line of what you'll see.

BTR TFS FTW
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2016 | 05:15 PM
  #11  
Jtm2085's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 15
Default

If you have the spendable cash definitely splurge for fast manifold. Start checking the classifieds for a used one
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2016 | 08:59 PM
  #12  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

well i just tore off the factory heads tonight and found rust has pitted one of my driver's side cylinder walls, so it looks like Im going to be going through the short block/honing now. on the bright side, 500 shouldn't be a problem with forged internals/higher compression pistons
Reply
Old May 1, 2016 | 10:20 AM
  #13  
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 7
From: Texas!
Default

Originally Posted by Mercier
I am by no means trying to cause a fuss here.. But you are being a good vendor and responding so I am curious on this specific situation. I really thought that you guys used to list an actual set of 2.5 5.3 heads on your website. I recall calling and asking about them, maybe 1.5-2 years ago when I was looking at buying my first set of LS heads. I was told on the phone that since 862s and 706s weren't production parts anymore that I would perhaps get a different casting(243 maybe even?) that you would machine to the same specs as the /PRC 2.5 5.3/ and it would perform the same or better. Now 243 ports and chambers are demonstrably better; no question of that. But when comparing a 64.5cc head to a 61.15cc head, it tells me that to get to the same combustion chamber size, you would have to mill the 243 3.35cc or about .020" is my only point. 243 is better. But for same compression ratio the valve might be closer to the piston and a concern with a big cam.

Do you offer the 2.5 5.3 as a part any longer? I can only find the service for sending your own heads in for that job...so if that's all that is offered now, I kinda understand why my original statement was odd. Maybe I dreamt all of this IDK. Wasn't trying to bash your product or company at all.

Thanks.
As of right now we don't offer the 2.5 5.3 out right other than with a used casting. We did offer it for years with a new casting though. Like you stated it would be with an actual 5.3 casting. We also offered a 2.5 ls6 head as well which would have had a 243/799 casting. We just wouldn't randomly send you one in the others place. That would be pretty poor business practice.

What you wouldn't just automatically know is that in order to get the larger 2.02, 1.57 valves into the 5.3 head and get the head the way we want it, we have to take out part of the chamber. This is all done with a cnc machine but it gives the head about a 63cc chamber instead of a 61. This wouldn't have anything to do with which head you get but it makes the heads very similar. They are within 8cfm once complete but the 243/799 is still the better head. Just not by the same margin as they were in stock form.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE