Balanced Engine Question
Pretty sure the machine shop did a terrible job with the balancing, as when the engine is reved up to around 3500rpm the entire car is vibrating. This does not seem normal and i don't remember the stock LS1 doing this. I know it isn't the transmission or torque converter as they are the same as before....
Provide this information, most here know the normal weights, as do I.
Upon inspection we will be able to give a more correct answer.
Your inspection reveals counter weight is too low.
There could be Flywheel/Pressure Plate problems.
Where these items "spun" ?
Lance
If you don't mind helping me read and understand them. I obviously understand the weights of the pistons and rods. What do you look for in the bob weights?
I never weight the pistons and rods myself as i was trusting them. it seems like the pistons and rods are almost too close to believe. I am running CP pistons for boost in 3.905" and eagle H beam rods and 4" crank.
any advice and help is appreciated.
The art needed to create this is KNOWN, thus I would believe the shop did the correct work.
The front pulley could by "out", not installed correctly, broken ?
There is NO "key" in the pulley though you could check for "drilling" marks OR worst case have it "0" balanced.
My guess is that you WOULD NOT be able to "feel" the imbalance if the pulley was "out".
The "drill" marks seen in the FP, if any, are placed AFTER engine assemble, the GM OEM method.
Would you be able to rule out engine miss-fire ?
Lance
The only other thing could be the transmission/converter. However it is the exact same transmission and torque convert as ran before and i had no issues or vibration, so pretty sure the converter is balanced (i have had converters not balanced cause vibration before).
Do the specs on the sheets and bob weight used look correct?
Reason I am suspecting the balancing of the crank, is because the shop that balanced the crank also was to line hone the mains (installed main studs) and install cam bearings. However when i got the engine back i could not install the cam because the bearings were so tight, and the crank was so tight i couldn't turn it over by hand. After measuring it was .0015" out of round from the arp studs. After taking it back to them twice and they didn't fix either i took the engine to another machine shop that properly line honed and clearanced the cam bearings. I'm kicking myself for not having the second machine verify the balancing of the crank.
Trending Topics
I'd be looking in other places. Make sure all cylinders are firing correctly - fuel and spark. Do all the spark plugs look good? Did all the electrical connectors get plugged in correctly?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
the cam turning torque ?
There are many engine assemblers that replace main bolts with studs.
The most common case is ONLY a "lite" hone is needed caused by the original GM block machine NOT the fastener replacement.
This will increase the housing bore size.
How did you measure the housing bore and what size did you measure ?
What was the main Torque Value, using the ARP 100.lbs WILL "strip" threads, I use 80-85 .lbs. (Aluminum Block only)
What is your block material iron/aluminum ?
YES, as stated, the Balance Sheet looks normal with a LOW bob-weight observed.
That in its self would be good news.
CP, Calvert/Pankl, PROVIDE the piston weight with the piston order.
Would you report that to be a match ?
Who installed the transmission ?
MY observation is that we have not identified a cause.
Lance
Also to ensure the transmission/converter aren't the culprit I will unbolt the converter and move it back form the flex plate and start the engine again.
Some background on the car/engine. It is a 2002 camaro which had a stock LS1 and cam with turbo. I spun a bearing on it last year really bad (I think because the turbo boost was too high), so pulled the motor to rebuild. I installed a 4" eagle stroker crank, eagle rods, CP pistons. It has stock 241 heads that were reconditioned, new Morrel 3515 lifters, new push rods, and compression ratio set to 9.7:1. In installed new ARP main studs, ARP head studs, and all new bearings. I reused the same comp cam as before with same dual valve springs.
I verified all specs of the engine myself with bore gauges and micrometers. when the ARP main studs were installed it made the mains out of round by .001" and the cam was so tight with the new bearings I couldn't even install it. After taking it to the second machine shop the cam bearings had proper clearance and the mains were fixed and had the proper .0025" clearance. Also all rod bearings were correct as well. All torque settings were to what ARP recommended. All engine assembly and installation was performed by me as I am very particular and like to do it myself so I know it is done right, however I'm very busy and it has taken me about a year to get it installed and running.
Pretty sure the machine shop did a terrible job with the balancing, as when the engine is reved up to around 3500rpm the entire car is vibrating. This does not seem normal and i don't remember the stock LS1 doing this. I know it isn't the transmission or torque converter as they are the same as before....
Or are you talking about the crank snouts run out?
MY FIRST test, a possible fix, would be to ADD weight to the Flywheel.
There are four placement areas, ones that are easy to add a counter weight.
I would create an "arc" of steel, 3" x 1" x .375", with a hole in the center.
Then bolt it to the flywheel at the converter stud locations, one test of four.
The next step would be to spin the engine looking for better/worse vibration.
Once the correct location is found, add/trim the weight.
I have done this with success.
This "test" would PROVE/ANSWER the balance question.
Lance









