Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me understand lifter preload/why all methods give diff results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 12:10 PM
  #21  
tjz450's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

Check out iGage brand of calipers online, I paid less than 30 for my last one. I'm not sure why such precision is needed when every PR will be different if we wanted exact .0XX preload on each and every lifter.

Last edited by tjz450; Dec 25, 2017 at 07:34 AM. Reason: cross posted
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2017 | 10:52 PM
  #22  
dreadpirateroberts's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 648
Likes: 72
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Usually torque results in half a rotation on the bolt. That would mean your method 2 was lacking preload by a good 030. That would put you right in the range of your math method. To tell the difference between preload and torque, use a screwdriver handle to tighten the bolt instead of your ratchet. Or use a very mall ratchet so you can't get much torque on it. You'll feel it bottom out.

On the adjuster, I'm not a fan of the counting rotation method. I use calipers and measure the pushrods. I've never had the two not agree.
Yes. Always use a good 8" digi caliper.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2017 | 12:21 AM
  #23  
Dian's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 371
Likes: 18
From: switzerland
Default

Originally Posted by Pantera EFI
HI ALL, this is good "tech" though NO ONE has added the AL block/head expansion value.

The block/head temperature effects the pushrod length specification.

I am sure all here will agree that a steel part will grow less than an aluminum part.
I too try for "center" plunger location, with no problems found.

The alloy, 319-T5, of the GM block has a different growth rate than a 356-T6 used in the RHS block.
The newer GM HP blocks get the 319-T7 for greater strength.

THUS, when checking the pushrod length, block temperature should be considered.

Lance
as far as i know 319-t5/t7 is a cheaper and inferior alloy. it has lower strength and is more brittle. thermal expansion is exactly the same, btw. (the difference between t6 and t7 escapes me.)
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2017 | 08:28 AM
  #24  
big hammer's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
Default

Originally Posted by I R Gunnr
Background:
Stock LQ4

Mild Cam
DUR @ .004" 272*/280*
DUR @ .050" 210*/218*
LIFT .551/.551
LSA 116*
2A

When I bought the cam, stock length 7.400" pushrods were spec'd and worked fantastically

Then rebuilt motor:

1 -Heads Milled .025 w/ .040 gasket

2. New LS7 lifters - but these are interchangeable part right? So shouldnt change pushrod length

So here is the confusions:

Method 1 - Using pushrod checker - zero lash at 8.5 turns = 7.225 + .070 preload = 7.300 pushrod

Method 2 - Counting turns on the bolt from zero lash. 1 1/8 turns from zero lash = preload of about .052, using .047 per turn. 7.325 Pushrod From this post

Method 3 - Math - I milled .025 from the heads and used a gasket that is .011 thinner. Factory .051 - .040 Cometic = .011. So .036" total less height from rocker arm to block (lifters).
Then how in the hell does a 7.300 or 7.325 pushrod make sense, using the other methods? I would think 7.400 - .036 -> 7.364, so a 7.350 or 7.375.


The motor is together and running, but has epic valve train noise using a 7.300" pushrod. I've been all over the valve train, rockers tight, bearings good, etc - all good.

Before milling the heads, the valve train was factory silent.
Since milling the heads sounds like a sewing machine.

Anyone share how much a mill changed their length?


I'm pretty sure my 7.300s are too short, but i'm back to lost on how much longer to go.
How long did you let it run with the 7.300’s?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2017 | 08:31 AM
  #25  
big hammer's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
The ideal is to hit the middle range of the lifters travel. I thought LS7 had upwards of .190 on travel? and several folks have ran well over .080 pre load with good results. I personally would measure each valve and make sure none are under .070.

I am in a similar situation except I am running a morel 5315 with a travel of .140ish. Preload calls for .050 but I have several lifters in the .06x range because 3 valves measure .010-.015 lighter then the rest. Currently debating switching to a set of comp ultra pro adjustable rockers to get all valves the same and I am sure that will be worth a few ponies and a even more responsive engine down low.

It blows my mind after all these years somebody has not come up with a light weight adjustable roller tip rocker for LS....there is again the comp ultra pro but only offered in a 1.8 ratio which will work for some applications but most need or want a 1.7.
There’s just not the room under the Stock valve covers for adjustable rockers. So then you’re adding Shitty valve cover spacers too
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2017 | 08:49 AM
  #26  
kinglt-1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 253
From: Ft. Wayne, IN
Default

Or aftermarket valve covers...there are options.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.