Help me understand lifter preload/why all methods give diff results
#1
Help me understand lifter preload/why all methods give diff results
Background:
Stock LQ4
Mild Cam
DUR @ .004" 272*/280*
DUR @ .050" 210*/218*
LIFT .551/.551
LSA 116*
2A
When I bought the cam, stock length 7.400" pushrods were spec'd and worked fantastically
Then rebuilt motor:
1 -Heads Milled .025 w/ .040 gasket
2. New LS7 lifters - but these are interchangeable part right? So shouldnt change pushrod length
So here is the confusions:
Method 1 - Using pushrod checker - zero lash at 8.5 turns = 7.225 + .070 preload = 7.300 pushrod
Method 2 - Counting turns on the bolt from zero lash. 1 1/8 turns from zero lash = preload of about .052, using .047 per turn. 7.325 Pushrod From this post
Method 3 - Math - I milled .025 from the heads and used a gasket that is .011 thinner. Factory .051 - .040 Cometic = .011. So .036" total less height from rocker arm to block (lifters).
Then how in the hell does a 7.300 or 7.325 pushrod make sense, using the other methods? I would think 7.400 - .036 -> 7.364, so a 7.350 or 7.375.
The motor is together and running, but has epic valve train noise using a 7.300" pushrod. I've been all over the valve train, rockers tight, bearings good, etc - all good.
Before milling the heads, the valve train was factory silent.
Since milling the heads sounds like a sewing machine.
Anyone share how much a mill changed their length?
I'm pretty sure my 7.300s are too short, but i'm back to lost on how much longer to go.
Stock LQ4
Mild Cam
DUR @ .004" 272*/280*
DUR @ .050" 210*/218*
LIFT .551/.551
LSA 116*
2A
When I bought the cam, stock length 7.400" pushrods were spec'd and worked fantastically
Then rebuilt motor:
1 -Heads Milled .025 w/ .040 gasket
2. New LS7 lifters - but these are interchangeable part right? So shouldnt change pushrod length
So here is the confusions:
Method 1 - Using pushrod checker - zero lash at 8.5 turns = 7.225 + .070 preload = 7.300 pushrod
Method 2 - Counting turns on the bolt from zero lash. 1 1/8 turns from zero lash = preload of about .052, using .047 per turn. 7.325 Pushrod From this post
Method 3 - Math - I milled .025 from the heads and used a gasket that is .011 thinner. Factory .051 - .040 Cometic = .011. So .036" total less height from rocker arm to block (lifters).
Then how in the hell does a 7.300 or 7.325 pushrod make sense, using the other methods? I would think 7.400 - .036 -> 7.364, so a 7.350 or 7.375.
The motor is together and running, but has epic valve train noise using a 7.300" pushrod. I've been all over the valve train, rockers tight, bearings good, etc - all good.
Before milling the heads, the valve train was factory silent.
Since milling the heads sounds like a sewing machine.
Anyone share how much a mill changed their length?
I'm pretty sure my 7.300s are too short, but i'm back to lost on how much longer to go.
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
Ok, on method 2, preload is not .047" per rotation. It's .076". .047" is the bolt thread, but the preload is cantilevered past the bolt. Using similar triangles to calculate, .047" at the bolt is .076" at the pushrod cup. And also, there is torque. Did your 1-1/8" include torque? If it did, you have less preload than you think. Once you start actually applying torque, you are no longer adding preload, you are stretching the bolt to gain clamping force.
If using method2, you find dead soft touch with the rocker bolt, and you tighten the bolt just until it bottoms out. No further.
If using method2, you find dead soft touch with the rocker bolt, and you tighten the bolt just until it bottoms out. No further.
#3
Hmmm... well now method 2 is even more out of whack with the adjustable checker.
Did not account for torque...how would I know when the bolt is bottomed vs being twisted?
I'm obviously reading super deep into this...please let me know if this as an oversimplified way to look at it.
Seems either of those would in the ideal range, basing it on what was working before and adjusting for the parameters that have changed.
Did not account for torque...how would I know when the bolt is bottomed vs being twisted?
I'm obviously reading super deep into this...please let me know if this as an oversimplified way to look at it.
Seems either of those would in the ideal range, basing it on what was working before and adjusting for the parameters that have changed.
Last edited by I R Gunnr; 01-22-2017 at 04:12 PM.
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
Usually torque results in half a rotation on the bolt. That would mean your method 2 was lacking preload by a good 030. That would put you right in the range of your math method. To tell the difference between preload and torque, use a screwdriver handle to tighten the bolt instead of your ratchet. Or use a very mall ratchet so you can't get much torque on it. You'll feel it bottom out.
On the adjuster, I'm not a fan of the counting rotation method. I use calipers and measure the pushrods. I've never had the two not agree.
On the adjuster, I'm not a fan of the counting rotation method. I use calipers and measure the pushrods. I've never had the two not agree.
#5
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
I went through this recently. Honestly the best way is, make sure the lifter cups are all the way at the top of the bores in the lifters. Then using an adjustable pushrod, turn it in maybe 4 turns from stock pushrod length. Tighten down rocker arms. Adjust pushrod to 0 lash, and try and be as accurate as possible. Remove pushrod and measure. Add desired preload and be done.
I tried the counting the turns of the torque wrench method and it mathematically didn't come out right and varied between lifters.
I tried the counting the turns of the torque wrench method and it mathematically didn't come out right and varied between lifters.
#6
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Here's a thread to explain the bolt turns a little better, hope it helps.--->Bolt Turns Explained
I used the adjustable pushrod, counting turns (using the subtraction of 1/3 turn where no preload is applied to the lifter as explained in the link) and a dial indicator and basically came up with the same answers. I did this while my car was apart for my own curiosity. Note that the answers won't match exactly, the measuring tools are simply not that precise, with maybe the exception of using a dial indicator, but even the dial indicator method can introduce small errors.
I used the adjustable pushrod, counting turns (using the subtraction of 1/3 turn where no preload is applied to the lifter as explained in the link) and a dial indicator and basically came up with the same answers. I did this while my car was apart for my own curiosity. Note that the answers won't match exactly, the measuring tools are simply not that precise, with maybe the exception of using a dial indicator, but even the dial indicator method can introduce small errors.
#7
I ended up switching to 7.350 pushrods. Got about 1 3/4 turns from zero lash with them. Rotated the engine by hand, no issues, cranked her up and a little noise at first but then pretty quiet. There is still some noise in the cabin, but I think it has to do with my headers and not having a sufficient number of hangars. These LS7 lifters must be pretty forgiving, I went from a 7.300 to a 7.350 with only a small change in noise level. So IMHO, if any method gets you a consistent answer, then don't over think it and go with a pushrod that puts you in the top range of preload (.60-.90). The lifter has a travel of like .160 so plenty of wiggle room.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
The LS7 lifter are very forgiving, tho they can make some noise when under 0.050 preload. I am currently running around 0.070-0.075 preload and they are about as quiet as you can get. I really wanted to have preload in the 0.080's but the next step up was 0.090+. I am using 7.325" pushrods.
#9
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
I ended up switching to 7.350 pushrods. Got about 1 3/4 turns from zero lash with them. Rotated the engine by hand, no issues, cranked her up and a little noise at first but then pretty quiet. There is still some noise in the cabin, but I think it has to do with my headers and not having a sufficient number of hangars. These LS7 lifters must be pretty forgiving, I went from a 7.300 to a 7.350 with only a small change in noise level. So IMHO, if any method gets you a consistent answer, then don't over think it and go with a pushrod that puts you in the top range of preload (.60-.90). The lifter has a travel of like .160 so plenty of wiggle room.
The LS7 lifter are very forgiving, tho they can make some noise when under 0.050 preload. I am currently running around 0.070-0.075 preload and they are about as quiet as you can get. I really wanted to have preload in the 0.080's but the next step up was 0.090+. I am using 7.325" pushrods.
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
I ended up switching to 7.350 pushrods. Got about 1 3/4 turns from zero lash with them. Rotated the engine by hand, no issues, cranked her up and a little noise at first but then pretty quiet. There is still some noise in the cabin, but I think it has to do with my headers and not having a sufficient number of hangars. These LS7 lifters must be pretty forgiving, I went from a 7.300 to a 7.350 with only a small change in noise level. So IMHO, if any method gets you a consistent answer, then don't over think it and go with a pushrod that puts you in the top range of preload (.60-.90). The lifter has a travel of like .160 so plenty of wiggle room.
I am in a similar situation except I am running a morel 5315 with a travel of .140ish. Preload calls for .050 but I have several lifters in the .06x range because 3 valves measure .010-.015 lighter then the rest. Currently debating switching to a set of comp ultra pro adjustable rockers to get all valves the same and I am sure that will be worth a few ponies and a even more responsive engine down low.
It blows my mind after all these years somebody has not come up with a light weight adjustable roller tip rocker for LS....there is again the comp ultra pro but only offered in a 1.8 ratio which will work for some applications but most need or want a 1.7.
#11
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
16 Posts
Thermal Expansion = ???
HI ALL, this is good "tech" though NO ONE has added the AL block/head expansion value.
The block/head temperature effects the pushrod length specification.
I am sure all here will agree that a steel part will grow less than an aluminum part.
I too try for "center" plunger location, with no problems found.
The alloy, 319-T5, of the GM block has a different growth rate than a 356-T6 used in the RHS block.
The newer GM HP blocks get the 319-T7 for greater strength.
THUS, when checking the pushrod length, block temperature should be considered.
Lance
The block/head temperature effects the pushrod length specification.
I am sure all here will agree that a steel part will grow less than an aluminum part.
I too try for "center" plunger location, with no problems found.
The alloy, 319-T5, of the GM block has a different growth rate than a 356-T6 used in the RHS block.
The newer GM HP blocks get the 319-T7 for greater strength.
THUS, when checking the pushrod length, block temperature should be considered.
Lance
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
HI ALL, this is good "tech" though NO ONE has added the AL block/head expansion value.
The block/head temperature effects the pushrod length specification.
I am sure all here will agree that a steel part will grow less than an aluminum part.
I too try for "center" plunger location, with no problems found.
The alloy, 319-T5, of the GM block has a different growth rate than a 356-T6 used in the RHS block.
The newer GM HP blocks get the 319-T7 for greater strength.
THUS, when checking the pushrod length, block temperature should be considered.
Lance
The block/head temperature effects the pushrod length specification.
I am sure all here will agree that a steel part will grow less than an aluminum part.
I too try for "center" plunger location, with no problems found.
The alloy, 319-T5, of the GM block has a different growth rate than a 356-T6 used in the RHS block.
The newer GM HP blocks get the 319-T7 for greater strength.
THUS, when checking the pushrod length, block temperature should be considered.
Lance
I actually do consider this when planning preload. For the most part, you can figure from "cold" to operating temperature, you are going to gain 0.010" lash. Put another way, you will lose about 0.010" preload. Now, on higher strength aluminum, this variance is going to be closer to 0.008 or possibly even 0.006, but you will ALWAYS gain lash / lose preload with heat. Event he iron block / aluminum head truck motor should lose preload with temperature, but decidedly less vs the aluminum block.
On a LS7 lifter, That's pretty much a nuance, because there is a ton of "slop" in there. Using the Johnson short travels as an example, there's a reason you aim for 0.038" preload. You drop 0.008-0.010, putting you in the 0.028-0.030 range, which is exactly half the travel of the lifter.
For solid lifters, even more critical. Whatever your cold lash is, this is where you really need to understand the block thermal expansion, as this is the difference between 0.006 and 0.010" hot lash, which directly affects the actual perceived cam duration.
Food for thought, but what about your garage temperature. If you're doing all this and its 50 degrees in your garage in winter or its 110 in Arizona in the summer in your garage, that will impact your lash/preload by a couple thou. but again, on LS7 lifters, not that critical.
#14
TECH Fanatic
Method 4: Take the guess work out and buy an 8" digital caliper. Find zero lash, pull the checker out, measure with calipers, and add the desired preload to that value. Order pushrods.
#15
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
I've always found this to be the best. but I do use method 2 to confirm. I'll add the preload to the PR and then check bolt rotations.
#17
TECH Resident
iTrader: (34)
Personally I think the caliper is the most accurate method
The following users liked this post:
53te39 (09-21-2021)
#19
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
Ok, on method 2, preload is not .047" per rotation. It's .076". .047" is the bolt thread, but the preload is cantilevered past the bolt. Using similar triangles to calculate, .047" at the bolt is .076" at the pushrod cup. And also, there is torque. Did your 1-1/8" include torque? If it did, you have less preload than you think. Once you start actually applying torque, you are no longer adding preload, you are stretching the bolt to gain clamping force.
If using method2, you find dead soft touch with the rocker bolt, and you tighten the bolt just until it bottoms out. No further.
If using method2, you find dead soft touch with the rocker bolt, and you tighten the bolt just until it bottoms out. No further.