Trick Flow LS1 cams...
Would you match with stock 243 or ported?
Trending Topics
I would HOPE it was 116-118 for your needs with a small 216 Intake Lobe.
The MOST important specification is the Intake Close Degrees # @ .050".
I would use "ported" as flow will be increased without low end torque loss of a larger lobe.
Lance
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
They list it as a Truck Cam. I actually have a Comp Cam of the exact same spec in my 5.7 Holden Monaro and with ported 241 heads it performs well in the low to mid range but I would imagine it would disappoint those looking for huge top end. I chose it as a street cam though for a heavy car. It has a bit of shake although I had it tuned to be more quiet in that regard.
So I think a cam of this spec could suit some buyers but I am now looking to try something different, same emphasis on smooth street use in a heavy car but making use of the new lobe technology that exists since I bought the Comp. This cam has a pretty noisy valvetrain. As mentioned in another thread I am considering the CamMotion TORQUE TITAN II LS camshaft, 218/226 .595 .587 116, although its interesting that I can't find anyone on forums that has used that cam.
Last edited by Pulse Red; Feb 2, 2017 at 09:49 PM.
So I think a cam of this spec could suit some buyers but I am now looking to try something different, same emphasis on smooth street use in a heavy car but making use of the new lobe technology that exists since I bought the Comp. This cam has a pretty noisy valvetrain. As mentioned in another thread I am considering the CamMotion TORQUE TITAN II LS camshaft, 218/226 .595 .587 116, although its interesting that I can't find anyone on forums that has used that cam.
It actually sounds like something that would give me what I am chasing with stock street manors and drivability but would you still recommend such a cam for an LS1 powered car with a manual trans, all bolt ons, ported 241 heads and a 3.9 rear end? Or is it really aimed at the newer engined cars?
It actually sounds like something that would give me what I am chasing with stock street manors and drivability but would you still recommend such a cam for an LS1 powered car with a manual trans, all bolt ons, ported 241 heads and a 3.9 rear end? Or is it really aimed at the newer engined cars?
It works great in manual transmission cars. There is no low RPM bucking that you would get with larger cams. It is no dyno hero camshaft, but it drives like a dream and makes more power than the stock cam throughout the entire RPM range.
It works great in manual transmission cars. There is no low RPM bucking that you would get with larger cams. It is no dyno hero camshaft, but it drives like a dream and makes more power than the stock cam throughout the entire RPM range.
drove entirely stock....made broad torque and carried well to 6700 rpms
Only drawback was the Comp ground lobes were noisy. In Fact EPS now has Cam Motion grind his cams.
With that being said; If you're not after hero numbers or some racy idle but really demand pure stock drivability, then this is the perfect cam...
drove entirely stock....made broad torque and carried well to 6700 rpms
Only drawback was the Comp ground lobes were noisy. In Fact EPS now has Cam Motion grind his cams.
With that being said; If you're not after hero numbers or some racy idle but really demand pure stock drivability, then this is the perfect cam...













