Looking For A Sleeper Cam
06-30-2004, 10:19 AM
#21
IMO, The Lingenfelter cam is really designed for a stock exhaust car. I would not recommend it for a car with headers and exhaust mods, which I assume C5 has.
That's a huge split on the exhaust and not much gain on the intake. You can bring the intake up several degrees and reduce the LSA a few degrees and make better power with a similar performance curve and excellent idle (e.g. 214/220 116).
That's a huge split on the exhaust and not much gain on the intake. You can bring the intake up several degrees and reduce the LSA a few degrees and make better power with a similar performance curve and excellent idle (e.g. 214/220 116).
06-30-2004, 10:50 AM
#22
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: lewisburg tn
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car is going to be a full bolt on car including HS roller rockers and an elec. waterpump . It already has grotyham LT headers and 3" true dual exhaust . I would really like to make 400rwhp and 400rwtq if that is at all possible. I want people to think it is just another fbody with a loud exhaust. I also plan on a NX 150 wet shot THANKS for the info. guys .
06-30-2004, 08:18 PM
#23
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soliari
just did a search in the drag racing section. I don't see many good results from the LS6 cam ...
... that's also why I opted for a different stealth cam. Biggest thing is my increas in torque over stock way down in the RPM band.
... that's also why I opted for a different stealth cam. Biggest thing is my increas in torque over stock way down in the RPM band.
07-01-2004, 02:12 PM
#25
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best I did with the LS6 cam was 12.4 at 109 mph with MACs, lid, Yank Y3200, catback, and FTRA. Not the best, but still good considering how little I paid for the cam and springs.
