Cam thoughts w/ Milled 243s
Its cut on a 110+3 so its good on ptv without flycutting. it comes out to a 107 or 108 icl depending on timing set normally. It would be pretty close to the titan4 in that respect but a tighter lsa keeps the exhaust ptv not as much of an issue vs the 113 of the titan if it would be at all
I can sit here and compare all day but there will be power either way. our asa cam is cheaper so thats the main difference that is on paper. it may be overall quieter as well.
Its cut on a 110+3 so its good on ptv without flycutting. it comes out to a 107 or 108 icl depending on timing set normally. It would be pretty close to the titan4 in that respect but a tighter lsa keeps the exhaust ptv not as much of an issue vs the 113 of the titan if it would be at all
I can sit here and compare all day but there will be power either way. our asa cam is cheaper so thats the main difference that is on paper. it may be overall quieter as well.
Advancing helps improve exhaust ptv but decreases clearance on the intake side.
It seems Titan4 will have more room, but will they both work?
Honestly, I think I'd prefer the ASA, I just hadn't considered because I didn't think I'd have the PTV. But if its too close to call... I'd rather err on the side of more PTV.
It will be likely middle to end of the week.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I've got a rebuilt 2001 LS6 shortblock with king bearings, ARP bolts, and Mahle rings. Reman'd 243 heads milled .030 with .660 lift dual springs. I'm leaning GM MLS head gaskets with ARP head bolts, but I've been considering the Cometic .040. Regardless, I do not want to fly cut the pistons.
Anyway, assuming my TR224 (224/224 .56x/.56x 114lsa) is reusable from the blown motor... does anyone see any benefit going bigger considering the tight PTV, I don't imagine I can fit much more than the current cam anyway.
Torque goal is 350rwtq from 3000 to 6000 rpm. I called Tick last week to spec a cam, but haven't heard back. Thoughts?
You can read more about it here:
http://store.cammotion.com/the-titan4
There was no tuning change he just put cam in, they adjusted idle some, and ran it on the dyno from what Dave told me.
Ask him as he has more info on all that but i am pretty sure thats correct.
Even so, if the cam took diff tuning, would it have made a diff? If the cam took more timing etc thats a product of the cam swap. The og hotcam setup was tuned the same way, so thats not even a factor to calculate.
Based off when he ran the car i think the da may have been worse on this recent run, but dont quote me on that.
No need to nitpick it to death though, it ran 5mph faster while running worse et 60ft 800ft etc so it litetally means it was making more power.
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
There was no tuning change he just put cam in, they adjusted idle some, and ran it on the dyno from what Dave told me.
Ask him as he has more info on all that but i am pretty sure thats correct.
Even so, if the cam took diff tuning, would it have made a diff? If the cam took more timing etc thats a product of the cam swap. The og hotcam setup was tuned the same way, so thats not even a factor to calculate.
Based off when he ran the car i think the da may have been worse on this recent run, but dont quote me on that.
No need to nitpick it to death though, it ran 5mph faster while running worse et 60ft 800ft etc so it litetally means it was making more power.
On any other project again no one would ask for all that info though if it were any other cam. It dynod low but ran great at track and his feedback is all him. most combos that dyno low are just accepted as dynoing low.
We have sold quite a few of these actually.
Your questions have mostly been answered in both his threads on it honestly.








