Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lq4 build advise. Seriously.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2017, 05:56 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
2005LQ4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the tfs as well, couldn't remember off the top of my head if they used a 3/4" deck as well though for FI use (better to not assume and accidentally give out incorrect info IMO) And you have it absolutely correct WS6, in the market today there really is an option for almost every budget and power goal imagine-able, from tame to wild.
Old 09-11-2017, 06:47 PM
  #42  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2005LQ4
For that setup I'd stick with the cathedrals over the rectangle ports (LS3s). They may flow more but their velocity isn't as good, and they need a bigger cam to really utilize their potential. What I was going to do originally on mine was buy a set of clean 243 or 799 cores (around $350 or so off ebay for good useable ones) The only main difference between the 2 are the valves, with the 243 receiving the lightweight LS6 valves. They both have smaller chambers than your stock 317s for a nice compression bump, while flowing the same numbers. Then send them off to be ported by a reputable shop such as AI (Advanced Induction) or TEA (Total Engine Airflow). That will run around $1500 with a nice Tooley spring kit good for up to .660". Get a set of new rockers with the trunnion upgrade for another few hundred and you're in about $2100 for good CNC'd heads that flow well over 305cfm IN/270cfm EX and have good velocity so they're not a dog downstairs. FWIW AI also offers port matching for the FAST intakes for even better flow.

My Recommendation for the top-end (since you've already got the bottom figured out):

AI CNC'd 243/799 heads w/ spring kit

Stock non-offset rockers w/ comp trunnion upgrade

thicker wall pushrods (nice insurance)

Pat G spec'd cam in the 224-228 range (outstanding grinds and service)

Port matched FAST 102mm

Minimum 90mm TB (preferably 102mm as well)

Add some nice headers and you're flying!

FOR A CAM THAT SMALL DON'T OVER-DO THE COMPRESSION, IT WILL BE PERFECTLY HAPPY AROUND 10.5-11:1 AND TOTALLY SAFE ON 93. ALSO, ALWAYS INVEST IN THE HEADS FIRST, GREAT HEADS WITH A SHITTY CAM CAN STILL MAKE POWER, BUT TRY PUTTING SHITTY HEADS ON A GREAT CAM AND WATCH IT FALL ON ITS FACE
All good advice but I agree with WS6store about the heads, I'd go with TFS as cast before i'd put roughly 1800 in those 243/799 heads. The TFS as cast are are around 1700-1800 assembled, also. I put a set of as cast TFS 220 on a buddies car and that car by far exceeded expectations. Only issue is when using stock rockers you have to grind a couple small tabs off the bottom of the factory rocker stand to use them on the TFS heads.

Last edited by 00pooterSS; 09-11-2017 at 07:00 PM.
Old 09-11-2017, 06:51 PM
  #43  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

For this build just a set of stock heads are fine cleaned up and bolted on. No need to overdo it.
Old 09-11-2017, 07:15 PM
  #44  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
For this build just a set of stock heads are fine cleaned up and bolted on. No need to overdo it.
So would have stock pistons and a likely a good OE intake, but he bought forged internals and a FAST 102. This thread is confusing.

In his first post he did mention being able to do heads though as long as they are under 3k, so if you got it to spend, why not, it's only better in all ways to have good aftermarket heads. There's no downside except the money.
Old 09-11-2017, 07:22 PM
  #45  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Some people are all over the place because of people that jump in on builds like this and recommend buying 243s etc then sending them off and paying even more money for small returns on what should be a regular build. He was also pointed in a direction by his machinist as well.

In all honesty he would be just fine with hyper e flat tops, a stock truck intake, and a mild cam. But he wants to do it a different way, so the vendor has to guide him in some parts and what they are set on anyway either sell to em or have em buy somewhere. It is his build so he should do it his way. Can't build it for em.
Old 09-11-2017, 07:25 PM
  #46  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Some people are all over the place because of people that jump in on builds like this and recommend buying 243s etc then sending them off and paying even more money for small returns on what should be a regular build. He was also pointed in a direction by his machinist as well.

In all honesty he would be just fine with hyper e flat tops, a stock truck intake, and a mild cam. But he wants to do it a different way, so the vendor has to guide him in some parts and what they are set on anyway either sell to em or have em buy somewhere. It is his build so he should do it his way. Can't build it for em.
Agreed
Old 09-12-2017, 11:54 AM
  #47  
Teching In
 
Brons2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Some people are all over the place because of people that jump in on builds like this and recommend buying 243s etc then sending them off and paying even more money for small returns on what should be a regular build. He was also pointed in a direction by his machinist as well.

In all honesty he would be just fine with hyper e flat tops, a stock truck intake, and a mild cam. But he wants to do it a different way, so the vendor has to guide him in some parts and what they are set on anyway either sell to em or have em buy somewhere. It is his build so he should do it his way. Can't build it for em.
I don't think it's a big ask to have lucid design goals, and the thing will probably work better together if you do, especially the heads/intake/cam. I would return the crazy intake, personally.

You're right though, can't build it for them.
Old 09-29-2017, 06:17 PM
  #48  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
hankfan79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 89
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I'm back at it...
I picked up a set of used 243's off a 2010 pickup. This should bring my compression to around 11:1 if I have done my research enough.

My block is ready. Have my pistons/rods/bearings/oil pump/timing chain set
(BIG THANKS TO WS6STORE)

Now it is time to rebuild the heads (factory style) and select a camshaft.

I have tried to understand the specs of a camshaft but the numbers boggle my brain. I do know that I want it to behave on the street and be able to use A/C and idle properly at red lights...etc.

My builder mentioned keeping it around 224
TSP recommended their 228/232 .600" with dual springs
I paid for a Pat G spec'd cam but haven't received specs yet (Sept 11th)
Called BTR but got no answer.
Called Cam Motion but got no answer.

Any opinions?

Last edited by hankfan79; 09-29-2017 at 07:56 PM.
Old 09-29-2017, 07:37 PM
  #49  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Id say (on our end) its a toss up between our high lift hot cam and the high lift asa cam. Both will make great streetable power. Just depends on where you want your power range to be and how hard you want it to chop.
Id expect the high lift hot cam to make 400ish at the tire on your build and the asa to make roughly 430. And the torque would be up there also.

Cam and springs are $515 for either.
Old 09-29-2017, 07:47 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

I would re contact Pat G if you've already paid he would be embarrassed to let
That slip through the crack and not make it right.
Other then that I like the Cam Motion LS1 Titan 3 for your App.
224/228 113+4.
My .02
GL
Old 09-29-2017, 07:48 PM
  #51  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
hankfan79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 89
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

430 (of course) sounds better. I don't care if it "chops" or not. Just want the most reliability and hp combined. Are there any setbacks with the ASA cam?

Originally Posted by NAVYBLUE210
I would re contact Pat G if you've already paid he would be embarrassed to let
That slip through the crack and not make it right.
I did get some response from him on Sept 11. He said they have just got power back on (hurricane weather I suppose) and he was being swamped with emails and such. I can understand that. I emailed him again today. I am sure he will respond but until then I want as many opinions as I can get. I might actually buy one before he can respond. No disrespect meant at all.

Last edited by hankfan79; 09-29-2017 at 07:54 PM.
Old 09-29-2017, 08:11 PM
  #52  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,659
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

No real setbacks at all honestly. Not with your setup.
Old 11-12-2017, 11:59 PM
  #53  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

To answer your first post, 400 rwhp would be simple enough so anything involving milling your 317 heads or getting 243 heads, longtubes etc. will only up that number.

On my stock 2005 lq4 with a Frost mail order tune, I made 302 rwhp on a 224 dynojet through an automatic th400 , 3.73 gears and 3000 stall 9.5 inch torque converter.

I then added a Btr stage 2 turbo cam (226/231 .605/.598 113+4) and cheap 1 3/4" mid length headers from hedman and went to 380 rwhp on the same dyno. 78 rwhp gain. All this with the stock 9.4:1 CR and truck intake and throttle body, power steering, stock crank pulley, steel driveshaft.

Last edited by foxsl; 11-13-2017 at 12:08 AM.
Old 12-08-2017, 06:12 PM
  #54  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (47)
 
rpturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A-Town, Ill side
Posts: 2,362
Received 195 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

I also have a LQ4 with hand ported by me 799 heads and a BTR/LJMS stg 2 turbo cam. I have a LS6 intake on it, with the GTP 42# injectors on it, and through a 4L60E with a Yank SS3600 it's putting down just under 420RWHP. Considering this has a turbo cam in it, I am very happy with this, and it makes for a nice daily driver with good overall power.

Once boost is thrown at this, it should respond very, very well. If this were meant to be kept N/A, I would choose a more appropriate N/A camshaft.

Considering what it is, a 94 S-10, it runs 12.1's 12.2's with a 2.0 60' (Needs cal-trac's and good tires) @ 3440#'s.
Old 12-08-2017, 08:06 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
LQ4finatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LQ4 Build for Chevy 2500 HD

Hi i recently purchased a LQ4 block and I'm looking to build it 400 CI and almost 500hp for my daily driver chevy. I am asking for you opinion on how to build it. Im unsure if i need a higher performance water pump, oil pump, or what kind of injection set up to use. Let me know what you guys think
Old 12-08-2017, 09:15 PM
  #56  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,876
Received 3,021 Likes on 2,352 Posts
Default

WHOA! Deja vu..... 2 threads down from this one.....
Old 12-09-2017, 06:09 PM
  #57  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Old Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 5,640
Received 70 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

L92, mild cam, stock intake & heads, shorty headers, thru a 4L75E.
Vengence Racing dyno: 400/400, and called it off at 6000.
Old 12-16-2017, 04:26 AM
  #58  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
foxsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rpturbo
I also have a LQ4 with hand ported by me 799 heads and a BTR/LJMS stg 2 turbo cam. I have a LS6 intake on it, with the GTP 42# injectors on it, and through a 4L60E with a Yank SS3600 it's putting down just under 420RWHP. Considering this has a turbo cam in it, I am very happy with this, and it makes for a nice daily driver with good overall power.

Once boost is thrown at this, it should respond very, very well. If this were meant to be kept N/A, I would choose a more appropriate N/A camshaft.

Considering what it is, a 94 S-10, it runs 12.1's 12.2's with a 2.0 60' (Needs cal-trac's and good tires) @ 3440#'s.
That's a decent rwhp, what was your mph? Once you hook up you'll be in the mid 11s easily after the 60 ft improves.



Quick Reply: Lq4 build advise. Seriously.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.