Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My quest for a stock bottom, 450hp LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2017, 08:13 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I drove my Camaro daily for a bit. It has a 235/242 and I didn't have an issue 🤷dum♀️.
Old 09-07-2017, 11:07 AM
  #22  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
ironmanLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Export, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
For a street car, I'm not sure I'd go over 228 duration. My neighbor has a 6.0 GTO with a 231 cam and said it was at the edge for drivability.

Last track day, there was a guy with a Mallet Corvette that put out about 500 HP. The previous owner had $32,000 in just the engine. The new owner said he'd like to drive it on the street but the car couldn't hold a decent idle. Bigger isn't always better.
You referring to the guy with the Lingenfelter set up? If so, that was a bad *** vette.
Old 09-07-2017, 12:39 PM
  #23  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes on 1,146 Posts

Default

Duration is not the end all on driveability. It's overlap. Longer durations tend to overlap more but you can get less overlap and decent duration.

And anyway, if you're looking at 228 range cams, you'll need great heads to hit power goals, but it'll drive great

You could do a 230/236 that will drive nice. Just put it on a 114 + 4. You'll want to run 11.5 compression with that. But you'll only have five degrees overlap and it'll rev good.

Last edited by Darth_V8r; 09-07-2017 at 12:44 PM.
Old 09-07-2017, 01:02 PM
  #24  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Spamfritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DFW / Texas
Posts: 459
Received 93 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toes
Go forced induction an forget all the heads cam nonsense. You'll easily get your 450 number.
With such a goal, I'd avoid the forced induction nonsense. A supercharger is going to cost more than the heads and cam package he's looking at, as will a turbo setup. Not to mention, swapping the heads and cam in will be easier than hacking up your radiator support, replacing headers, routing exhaust, down pipes, possibly getting rid of your A/C or getting a turbo K-member, and the other crap that goes with a turbo swap. Sure you'll make more power, but not everyone wants to go through all that trouble.
Old 09-07-2017, 01:28 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I was trying to see how much you cared about driveability. If DD is a concern, here's how I would go:

TFS220's or mamo 223's for heads
Fast102
228/234-114+2 cam. 650/630 lift
PSI Springs and titanium hardware
ATI balancer
Measure for pushrods length. Never guess
1-7/8 headers
Speed engineering dual exhaust

If DD is not really a concern, then disregard this post.
Listen to this guy.
Old 09-07-2017, 02:52 PM
  #26  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
02sunsetorangeZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

FWIW, i have TMS 799's which are a budget head, tick sns 2, 231/235. fast 92/92, 1&7/8 long tubes. Can drive around town if i want, every now and again a lil cam surge but nothing bad, put down 450whp and 420tq. pulled to 6700rpm. Very fun car so far.
Old 09-07-2017, 03:02 PM
  #27  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 242 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

We have a kit very similar to the hawks setup only uses a fast92/92nw tb, new FAST42lb ls1 style inj tps 5.3 2.5 cnc heads and a cam. itll make at least 450 on a manual and mid 400s on a stall.

The whole package runs $3999 shipped. includes everything you need PLUS all the gaskets, bolts, seals, cam thrust plate, billet timing set, ported oil pump, pushrods, 85mm truck maf conversion with all couplers. More inclusive than any kit out there and cheaper too!! Add porting to the fast 92 for $200 more.

Last edited by tech@WS6store; 09-07-2017 at 03:10 PM.
Old 09-07-2017, 03:33 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,200
Received 3,146 Likes on 2,453 Posts
Default

I would think the above kit with your hi-lift hot cam would be a wicked-sounding BUT smooth-running beast! Not sure of the power level though..
Old 09-07-2017, 03:36 PM
  #29  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 242 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

Hot cam prob not...but the high lift asa cam....
Old 09-07-2017, 04:16 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,200
Received 3,146 Likes on 2,453 Posts
Default

Right... I thought it would be a fairly stout cam to get those numbers..
Any thoughts on HP numbers on that kit with the hi-lift hot cam?
Old 09-07-2017, 09:55 PM
  #31  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,744
Received 846 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ironmanLS1
You referring to the guy with the Lingenfelter set up? If so, that was a bad *** vette.
I'm referring to the maroon Mallet C5 Vette that ran at Nelson Ledges earlier this year. There is a pewter Mallet C5 Vette that runs at Pitt Race. I'm guessing that they are pretty much the same setup. BTW, that Mallet LS1 engine cost the original owner $32,000 to have built.
Old 09-08-2017, 10:36 AM
  #32  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
tech@WS6store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,660
Received 242 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Right... I thought it would be a fairly stout cam to get those numbers..
Any thoughts on HP numbers on that kit with the hi-lift hot cam?
Low 400s is a guess.
Old 09-08-2017, 11:09 AM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

That TSP PRC Stg II 5.3/MS4 package has been putting down 450whp and 380wtq for years...it's nothing new.

Personally if you like the TSP package price, then get those heads, step the cam down to the 228/232 or Torquer V4 and go with a Fast 92/92. The intake will make up the difference in peak power of the bigger cam and it will drive nicer. I also did not recommend Fast 102 because they can be a pain to tune. If you have a good tuner around you then disregard and go 102.

Also do not skimp on the valve train...that makes or breaks a good combo. Get a Straub bushed rocker, a quality lifter(Morel 5315 or Johnson 2110), and get your push rod length correct. It will be a fun combo.
Old 09-08-2017, 01:37 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,200
Received 3,146 Likes on 2,453 Posts
Default

^^^^Good thinking!^^^^^^
Old 09-08-2017, 09:15 PM
  #35  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Toes
Go forced induction an forget all the heads cam nonsense. You'll easily get your 450 number.
+1 after I added up my H/C, supporting mods like, lifters, lifter treys, oil pump, timing chain, FAST 92, TB, FTP lid, MAF, bellows, TB harness, UD pulley etc

I wish I would have saved up another couple grand and just went with a D1SC. It's a lot of cash up front but would have been done right for me the first time. And personally 450rwhp got old fairly quick, it's really not that fast IMO.
Old 09-09-2017, 09:08 PM
  #36  
Teching In
 
Rider_01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
That TSP PRC Stg II 5.3/MS4 package has been putting down 450whp and 380wtq for years...it's nothing new.

Personally if you like the TSP package price, then get those heads, step the cam down to the 228/232 or Torquer V4 and go with a Fast 92/92. The intake will make up the difference in peak power of the bigger cam and it will drive nicer. I also did not recommend Fast 102 because they can be a pain to tune. If you have a good tuner around you then disregard and go 102.

Also do not skimp on the valve train...that makes or breaks a good combo. Get a Straub bushed rocker, a quality lifter(Morel 5315 or Johnson 2110), and get your push rod length correct. It will be a fun combo.
Hmmm, if I keep my T/A I might go this route.
Old 09-10-2017, 07:55 AM
  #37  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,746 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spamfritter
With such a goal, I'd avoid the forced induction nonsense. A supercharger is going to cost more than the heads and cam package he's looking at, as will a turbo setup. Not to mention, swapping the heads and cam in will be easier than hacking up your radiator support, replacing headers, routing exhaust, down pipes, possibly getting rid of your A/C or getting a turbo K-member, and the other crap that goes with a turbo swap. Sure you'll make more power, but not everyone wants to go through all that trouble.
Guessing you've never don't a blower or a turbo in an LS fbody?
Old 09-11-2017, 10:23 AM
  #38  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Spamfritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DFW / Texas
Posts: 459
Received 93 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Guessing you've never don't a blower or a turbo in an LS fbody?
Nope. I've considered it, and probably will at some point. I just don't think it would be easier than heads / cam swap.
Old 09-11-2017, 10:48 AM
  #39  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I did my own HC and dont see how a D1 would be harder. Radiator has to come out with both and with a D1 you dont have to mess with the top end.

My tuner does custom turbo installs out the door with a tune for 5k. You just need to supply the fuel system. Call around and do some research before you pull the trigger on HC.
Old 09-11-2017, 03:09 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,746 Likes on 1,304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spamfritter
Nope. I've considered it, and probably will at some point. I just don't think it would be easier than heads / cam swap.
The majority of the negatives you posted aren't reality for most installs. Putting my blower kit on was way easier than heads cam.


Quick Reply: My quest for a stock bottom, 450hp LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.