Stock rockers +trunion or Roller rockers?
#21
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
The CHE don't have to be installed like the others. They are not an interference fit...
But I would not go with Scorpions. Nope.
The TSP roller rockers seem like good options as well. Being that they are steel and not much heavier than stock, I'd vote them. But they do cost more.
But I would not go with Scorpions. Nope.
The TSP roller rockers seem like good options as well. Being that they are steel and not much heavier than stock, I'd vote them. But they do cost more.
#23
TECH Senior Member
If I were running a cam with around .550 or so lift, I would just do a trunnion upgrade. But at around .600 or over, you are running past the point where the rocker won't dig or "scrub" into the valve. Then I would run roller tip rockers. And as was said, the TSP units look good!
#25
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Youll be fine. We designed the cam to be efficient, quiet, have minimal issues with any guide wear, an still use a high quality beehive to keep the budget down.
There are quite a few different theories floating around about how much lift vs scrub vs loading etc etc and then there are real worlders running every combo you can think of also.
That is the main reason we went .600 lift. Seems to satisfy all the theories so to speak yet not be very aggressive on ramp rate. We could have put in over .600 but then it could be an issue of guide wear...but most other companies stg 2,3,4,5 cams have over .600 lift on either intake or exhaust and nothing is said there. So grains of salt are the best way to take the theories.
The rockers we introduced because they are better than another competitors, already assembled and very cost efficient. You see one post in here where the guy said "i dont want to assemble so ill just go roller" he is somewhat the idea behind em. Or guys that buy bare heads and have no rockers to begin with.
Sorry for the long post
There are quite a few different theories floating around about how much lift vs scrub vs loading etc etc and then there are real worlders running every combo you can think of also.
That is the main reason we went .600 lift. Seems to satisfy all the theories so to speak yet not be very aggressive on ramp rate. We could have put in over .600 but then it could be an issue of guide wear...but most other companies stg 2,3,4,5 cams have over .600 lift on either intake or exhaust and nothing is said there. So grains of salt are the best way to take the theories.
The rockers we introduced because they are better than another competitors, already assembled and very cost efficient. You see one post in here where the guy said "i dont want to assemble so ill just go roller" he is somewhat the idea behind em. Or guys that buy bare heads and have no rockers to begin with.
Sorry for the long post
#27
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
#28
The CHE don't have to be installed like the others. They are not an interference fit...
But I would not go with Scorpions. Nope.
The TSP roller rockers seem like good options as well. Being that they are steel and not much heavier than stock, I'd vote them. But they do cost more.
But I would not go with Scorpions. Nope.
The TSP roller rockers seem like good options as well. Being that they are steel and not much heavier than stock, I'd vote them. But they do cost more.
what about Harland Sharp?
#31
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Get the Straub Technologies bushing upgrade, it will cost around $200. My cam is a 243/251 with over .660 lift and so far I've had no issues running them with LS7 rockers.
#33
I think I am going to do rollers. I don't have the expertise to install trunions. Still probably won't have money for the heads until tax time. Hopefully I can ship the rockers with the heads, and have Frankenstein install them while building up the heads.
#38
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Suggestions?