Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help building my First LS 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 08:02 AM
  #1  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default Help building my First LS 5.3

Hello. I am new to this site. Also new to building a 5.3. I have had lots of old school GM engine. So I just have to get some education on sourcing the right parts and building this engine for what it is supposed to do. I have bough ten all the books on the engines. So assembly is not a problem. Also have access to some of the special tools. I am building LM7 5.3 for a big heavy 4 door Jeep / Rock Crawler. I drive it on the highway and street .it weighs about 6.500 Lbs. I have lots of gearing so I'm good with my plan of a 5.3 and a 4L60 . The whole jeep wiring will be eliminated and rewired,no more Canbus to deal with. It will be like building a hot rod. I am looking for about 385 hp or so. This is what I have collected so far,5.3 that will need to be rebuilt it ran fine. Had 130.000 miles on it. I have a new LQ9 cam.New 243 heads with the none sodium valves. So I need help sourcing parts at a good price. I need some valve train parts. The proper flat top pistons, and all the other parts I will need to refresh this motor. I'm thinking of running a FI -Tech fuel injection system. .i need a stand alone system. Do you guys like my cam choice. I already have it so I thought it's going to be good enough . Also need a contact ti build me a strong 4L60 trans . I have one just want it redone. I live in Canada but have a US address to get my parts shipped to. I'm in the Spokane WA area. Thank you people for your time. Rob. Oh one more thing. Yes the whole Dash will be coming out too. I have to build one of those too. Will still be wanting Heat and Aircond. And power door locks and Windows. So will be needing to source a dash guy to buy parts etc. was looking at 12 volt guy stuff.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 08:16 AM
  #2  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 109
From: Ohio
Default

Pump the brakes lol.

-130k miles, it won't need a rebuild. You might end up doing more harm than good.
-243 heads will lower compression, you'll lose only a little bit of power, but a fair amount of torque.
-Skip OEM cams. Get a real cam that will make the power curve you need.
-The 4L60e isn't a very good trans. They have several problems. Also, you would need a standalone that can do transmission control.
-A stock 4L80e will outlast any mild built 4l60e.
-FITech system is like a self-adjust carb. They're not the most ideal. For something you don't want to mess with, they will work fine.

Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 09:58 AM
  #3  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for you input. Still thinking about the cam . But I think I will do the pistons some bowl blending on the heads. I will be using the Fi tech manifold etc. the whole system incl trans connection for programming. I think Beefed up L60 should handle this little power plant. Also 60 has a lower first gear. I use more offroad than the street. I trailer it on long trips. It's a 2007 but only has 30.000 miles on it. What cam were you thinking. When I take motor apart will find out if it needs going over. Thanks again.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 10:08 AM
  #4  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 109
From: Ohio
Default

The FITech manifold loses power/torque everywhere below 6000 RPM compared to a stock 5.3 truck manifold. Not to mention, the FITech is geared towards ease of use and safety and shys away from optimal power/torque. In a 6000 lb vehicle, expect it to be a dog.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 10:58 AM
  #5  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for that info i was wondering about there system. i have the factory system still so it will work. there is a tuner in Spokane that ca make me a stand alone system . i have lots to think about for the 5.3 got a suggestion for a cam, for my application. Thanks for your help But i do like the cool looking manifold FI has lol
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 11:50 AM
  #6  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 109
From: Ohio
Default

Gen 4 truck intake is going to be your best bet for power/torque on a budget that still makes excellent cruise/pulling torque.
Up to 4000 RPM, it makes more torque than most aftermarket manifolds as well.

Stock PCM/harness will do what you want. If you're going to spend the money, the Holley does trans control as well.

The FITech manifold is the same Chinese manifold that over 30 companies claim to be their own.
They are riddled with issues. They make poor torque and are noisy. Some people have even had them come apart.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 02:57 PM
  #7  
kossuth's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: New Market, MD
Default

385 crankshaft horsepower should be easily obtained by just throwing a cam in and some super mild port work on the 862/706 heads with a 2.0 intake valve. I agree with the poster above, unless there is something wrong, it won’t take much to get the desired hp out of it.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 05:56 PM
  #8  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 531
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by CanaRub
Thanks for that info i was wondering about there system. i have the factory system still so it will work. there is a tuner in Spokane that ca make me a stand alone system . i have lots to think about for the 5.3 got a suggestion for a cam, for my application. Thanks for your help But i do like the cool looking manifold FI has lol
JoeNova gave you solid advice so there isn't much left to add to this except I would go for a drop in truck cam. They add power but they don't trade off low end torque like most cams and you're gonna need as much torque as you can get. A small stall (torque converter) would be a good idea also, something around a 2500-3000 stall. You could go bigger too, but a stall will help with rock crawling since they multiply torque and will give you that flash of low end power you need.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 09:10 PM
  #9  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for your guys great info. I know I'm on the right forum site. I have A LQ9 cam . I will look into maybe a different cam and the Gen 4 intake. Thanks again for your help. Rob
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 09:10 AM
  #10  
8.Lug's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 711
Likes: 6
From: PNW
Default

If you want to stay with a stock cam to keep your stock springs, lifters, etc - get a ‘00 LS1 cam, the last four of their part numbers will 0965 or 0968. Otherwise, spend the $350 to get yourself real cam. And don’t waste any time or money on stand alone EFI, the stock PCM will do more than you’ll ever need.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 10:08 AM
  #11  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by 8.Lug
And don’t waste any time or money on stand alone EFI, the stock PCM will do more than you’ll ever need.
^^^^^^This. Especially FITech or Megasquirt. If you MUST go standalone, use Holley's. It is good stuff. But OEM will do the job for most (90% +) applications.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 11:58 AM
  #12  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Plans are coming togeather because I went on this site and got good info from hands on guys from this forum. I will buying a complete crane cam and valve train that all matches. Going with a factor ECM got a good tuner in Spokane. Just going to look for gen 4 truck manifold. Or will look into aftermarket truck intake. Got any sugestions? I will be running some block style headers. Whatever's works on a jk jerk LS swap. Good ones not cheap ones. I'm from Canada our money sucks buying a part for $1,000 Us dallars == $1.400 -$1.500 because of exchange on the dallar and taxes when I bring it into Canada. So we have to really shop around.Rob
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 02:12 PM
  #13  
Kawabuggy's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 823
Likes: 199
Default

I'm going to also say that your idea of running a 4L60E should be revisited. They are exceptionally weak units with known issues with the planetaries, output shaft, aluminum input drum, sunshell, input sprag, insufficient internal space for increased friction surface area, and many, many, other weaknesses. You can also expect transmission case life to be very short if you plan on offroading with larger tires. The center support in that unit will damage the cast in case lugs requiring upgrades to address it, or case replacement. You would be far better served by starting with any other transmission except the 700R4/4L60/4L60E family. You can WASTE a bunch of money trying to "beef one up" but in the end, after spending thousands of dollars, you will still have a transmission that is far weaker than an all stock 4L80E.. If you don't do much freeway driving, you could also use a 3 speed trans such as the TH-350, or TH-400. Both of those in stock form are significantly stronger than a 700/60E is, or could ever be.. If you use the TH-350 you will find that it is shorter in length and this will allow you to run a driveshaft that is a little longer in the rear. Using an 80E is going to have you using a very short rear driveshaft.. So short that the angles will eat up U-joints. You can expect that you will be changing U-joints out on a fairly regular basis if you drive the vehicle a significant amount of miles.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 03:17 PM
  #14  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 531
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by 8.Lug
If you want to stay with a stock cam to keep your stock springs, lifters, etc - get a ‘00 LS1 cam, the last four of their part numbers will 0965 or 0968. Otherwise, spend the $350 to get yourself real cam. And don’t waste any time or money on stand alone EFI, the stock PCM will do more than you’ll ever need.
He needs low, end. The LS1 cam will lose low end in exchange for high end so I wouldn't use that cam. There's tons of threads where guys put LS1/LS6 cams in trucks and hated it.

Originally Posted by CanaRub
Plans are coming togeather because I went on this site and got good info from hands on guys from this forum. I will buying a complete crane cam and valve train that all matches. Going with a factor ECM got a good tuner in Spokane. Just going to look for gen 4 truck manifold. Or will look into aftermarket truck intake. Got any sugestions? I will be running some block style headers. Whatever's works on a jk jerk LS swap. Good ones not cheap ones. I'm from Canada our money sucks buying a part for $1,000 Us dallars == $1.400 -$1.500 because of exchange on the dallar and taxes when I bring it into Canada. So we have to really shop around.Rob
I'd call BTR (brian tooley racing) or Cam Motion for your cam setup.

Originally Posted by Kawabuggy
I'm going to also say that your idea of running a 4L60E should be revisited. They are exceptionally weak units with known issues with the planetaries, output shaft, aluminum input drum, sunshell, input sprag, insufficient internal space for increased friction surface area, and many, many, other weaknesses. You can also expect transmission case life to be very short if you plan on offroading with larger tires. The center support in that unit will damage the cast in case lugs requiring upgrades to address it, or case replacement. You would be far better served by starting with any other transmission except the 700R4/4L60/4L60E family. You can WASTE a bunch of money trying to "beef one up" but in the end, after spending thousands of dollars, you will still have a transmission that is far weaker than an all stock 4L80E.. If you don't do much freeway driving, you could also use a 3 speed trans such as the TH-350, or TH-400. Both of those in stock form are significantly stronger than a 700/60E is, or could ever be.. If you use the TH-350 you will find that it is shorter in length and this will allow you to run a driveshaft that is a little longer in the rear. Using an 80E is going to have you using a very short rear driveshaft.. So short that the angles will eat up U-joints. You can expect that you will be changing U-joints out on a fairly regular basis if you drive the vehicle a significant amount of miles.
Good advice.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
kossuth's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: New Market, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Kawabuggy
I'm going to also say that your idea of running a 4L60E should be revisited. They are exceptionally weak units with known issues with the planetaries, output shaft, aluminum input drum, sunshell, input sprag, insufficient internal space for increased friction surface area, and many, many, other weaknesses. You can also expect transmission case life to be very short if you plan on offroading with larger tires. The center support in that unit will damage the cast in case lugs requiring upgrades to address it, or case replacement. You would be far better served by starting with any other transmission except the 700R4/4L60/4L60E family. You can WASTE a bunch of money trying to "beef one up" but in the end, after spending thousands of dollars, you will still have a transmission that is far weaker than an all stock 4L80E.. If you don't do much freeway driving, you could also use a 3 speed trans such as the TH-350, or TH-400. Both of those in stock form are significantly stronger than a 700/60E is, or could ever be.. If you use the TH-350 you will find that it is shorter in length and this will allow you to run a driveshaft that is a little longer in the rear. Using an 80E is going to have you using a very short rear driveshaft.. So short that the angles will eat up U-joints. You can expect that you will be changing U-joints out on a fairly regular basis if you drive the vehicle a significant amount of miles.
I would tend to agree with this poster in regards to the transmission choice here. I would look into either a turbo 350 if there is no intent to daily the vehicle. If you intend to commute the vehicle once in awhile the 4L60 can do it, but like others suggested it’s not the best. If you are going to stick with a 4L60e then I would for sure do the following.

1. Install a good external cooler. A dedicated fan for said cooler probably wouldn’t be a bad thing.
2. Get your final drive/tire size combo somewhere in the 24 inches per driveshaft revolution count if not lower.
3. Stick with a stock or very low rpm converter. Higher rpm converters build heat quicker.
4. A large fluid capacity pan

Gearing and and heat dissipation is what will keep that transmission alive. I don’t think your so much a risk to break components inside as much as you’re likely to burn up components from heat.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 01:19 AM
  #16  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Got me thinking about this trans. I will do more research . I have the trans so I thought I would just get it beefed up to handle 400 hp or so. I'm running 40 inch tires 5.13. But when I'm wheeling I have lots of low gears to choose from. It's a rock crawler so it has good drive shaft double Cardin 1350 joints. Lots of choices , I will do more research and do it right the first time.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 11:38 AM
  #17  
kossuth's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: New Market, MD
Default

Originally Posted by CanaRub
Got me thinking about this trans. I will do more research . I have the trans so I thought I would just get it beefed up to handle 400 hp or so. I'm running 40 inch tires 5.13. But when I'm wheeling I have lots of low gears to choose from. It's a rock crawler so it has good drive shaft double Cardin 1350 joints. Lots of choices , I will do more research and do it right the first time.
So those gears and tires get you around 24.4" inches per driveshaft revolution, which gives you a final drive ratio similar to a fullsize silverado 1500 with 31" tires and 3:73 gears. If you do a search on the old google machine you'll see alot of folks do tow trailers with the particular combo you have (5.3 and 4L60E in various platforms IE pickups, tahoes, surburbans etc) and they mention time and time again in towing applications (which is what I would presume your application is the closest to vs drag racing) temps kill these things particularly fluid temps in the 230+ range. As long as the transmission and transfer case are in good shape you should be fine, but again keep heat out of it. What I'm more curious about is are you running the OEM transfer case and if so how do you plan to activate the transfer case given I believe most if not all of them by that time are electronic.

Again as for your motor you don't need to do a full rebuild on it to get 385 hp, in fact I'd be tempted to run it as is. Stock they are rated for 275-285. While I have never dynoed a 5.3 if they are anything like the 5.7 HP wise they are probably closer in reality to 300. If you didn't know GM when the LS platform came out was known to have a large number of factory freaks running around, particularly in the 5.7 motors. In short there were plenty of 5.7 fbodies which should have been making 260-275 at the wheels stock that were actually making 300ish if not more. Timesheets backed up these numbers with some bone stock cars running low 13's to high 12's in the quarter mile STOCK trapping well over 105 mph. So I wouldn't get too wrapped up in doing alot of work to it if it runs ok now.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 11:55 AM
  #18  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Those 5.7 F bodies that had "extra" power had LS6's in them. Apparently GM ran short of LS1's, so they dropped LS6's in their place! Build cost difference was minimal, so GM didn't lose much on the deal.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 02:20 PM
  #19  
CanaRub's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks guys. Little info on myself. I'm an older guy and have have fords and Chevys. I'm a Chevy guy. I have had lots of small blocke cars,69 Z28 302 4 gear. Also 70Z28 LT1. And so many cars and trucks I have lost count. I had a 2000 Yukon 5.3 but just did a few bolt ons. Also Ls7 big block and 3 or4 old school 383. But this will be my first LS build . The 4 door jeep now has a 202 Hp **** box Dodge Van Motor. I did a tune and TBS and intake. They are junk . So that is why I'm gutting the Jeep and going with LS engine and a build 4L60 or ? The jeep now runs good on the highway. But when it hits a hill its works. And the gas Mileage sucks. This jeep I'm redoing because I rolled it and is a good time to do it while it's apart. The new drivetrain will be using an Atlas 2 or 4 speed transfer case. With a built up transmission. I have wheeled the **** out of this dodge drivetrain , have bigger pan and cooler on trans and coolers also a gear reduction in the factory auto. Never had a problem overheating running 40 Inch tires. It also weighs about 6,200 lbs. I have lots of LS engine books. But you guys are very helpful. You guys got any recommendations for a good parts sources at good prices?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 03:10 PM
  #20  
kossuth's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: New Market, MD
Default

The vendors to the sides of the page are a good place to start. I personally like Texas Speed but most of not all our sponsors are good.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.