Is 500 HP possible on an LS1 or should I go with another engine?
#21
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes
on
1,152 Posts
Originally Posted by bammax
Don't rebuild the engine unless something is wrong with it. Your mileage is way too low to need a rebuild. Swap in new gaskets as you upgrade parts and you'll be fine. Also skip the k&n stuff, it's not worth the money and can cause some maf issues down the road.
#22
On The Tree
Thread Starter
I’m so paranoid of it blowing up having that many miles on it and then wasting my money and time rebuilding a new one.
I mean don’t get me wrong, if I can save money by not having to rebuild the bottom end I don’t mind putting that money elsewhere.
#23
On The Tree
Thread Starter
#25
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Sbe means stock bottom end. Never been rebuilt, stock bore/stroke/crank, stock rod bolts ect.
My motor has never been out of my car.
I do not have a build thread but will give a quick run down.
Heads: PRC 243's milled .030"
.040" head gasket
11.5 cr
Cam: 239/244 lsa 112
Intake: MSD Airforce 102
Exhaust: Long tube headers into 3in uncatted y pipe with a 4in. merger and 4in.electric cutout.
Converter: Yank Pt4400
Gears: 3.73's
- I will say my build may not be everyone's cup of tea. Meaning with that cam and milling my heads I did end up cutting valve reliefs in the piston tops.
- I am on stock rod bolts and spin my motor to 7100 rpms which not everyone is comfortable doing.
And my setup would probably like to be spun to around 7400 rpms
- Due to my setup you need a converter to match the power range and not everyone would be fine with driving my converter around. As you see in the video my shift extensions only drop to around 6300 rpms keeping it right in the wheel house of power band.
I absolutely love my setup but I do not drive it every day and I have a VERY good tuner.
There are definitely milder builds that will get you were you want to be if my route is a little extreme
My motor has never been out of my car.
I do not have a build thread but will give a quick run down.
Heads: PRC 243's milled .030"
.040" head gasket
11.5 cr
Cam: 239/244 lsa 112
Intake: MSD Airforce 102
Exhaust: Long tube headers into 3in uncatted y pipe with a 4in. merger and 4in.electric cutout.
Converter: Yank Pt4400
Gears: 3.73's
- I will say my build may not be everyone's cup of tea. Meaning with that cam and milling my heads I did end up cutting valve reliefs in the piston tops.
- I am on stock rod bolts and spin my motor to 7100 rpms which not everyone is comfortable doing.
And my setup would probably like to be spun to around 7400 rpms
- Due to my setup you need a converter to match the power range and not everyone would be fine with driving my converter around. As you see in the video my shift extensions only drop to around 6300 rpms keeping it right in the wheel house of power band.
I absolutely love my setup but I do not drive it every day and I have a VERY good tuner.
There are definitely milder builds that will get you were you want to be if my route is a little extreme
If I stay with my stock auto, I’ll definitely have to pull it and rebuild it. Since I got it, it feels like first gear is slipping a bit. After it bangs out of first it isn’t too bad if you get on the gas but I really haven’t played around with it yet to be honest.
However there are a few 4L60Es around here on FB and CL. I might pick one up and rebuild it how I need to and then just swap it in with a new higher stall converter.
#26
12 Second Club
I also think it's better to start with a manual car if that's what you really want. They get better MPG on the highway. That might not be important if you don't drive it much.
#27
On The Tree
Thread Starter
SBE is stock bottom end.
All you need for 500 fwhp is a good running sbe ls1, 230 (ish) cam swap, some good cnc cathedral heads, like PRC 5.3's. LS6 intake, ported TB, 1 3/4 or 1 7/8 4-1 Headers, tr55 plugs, and a good tune. I had one like that back in the early-mid 2000's. My MPH at the track versus weight indicated it was making around 530-540hp flywheel. I was shifting at 7200rpm. Was a stock 99 ls1 bottom end, untouched except for cam, new ls6 oil pump, and rollmaster timing chain.
That engine did 70,000 miles. Street, track, I abused it regularly. It never broke.
All you need for 500 fwhp is a good running sbe ls1, 230 (ish) cam swap, some good cnc cathedral heads, like PRC 5.3's. LS6 intake, ported TB, 1 3/4 or 1 7/8 4-1 Headers, tr55 plugs, and a good tune. I had one like that back in the early-mid 2000's. My MPH at the track versus weight indicated it was making around 530-540hp flywheel. I was shifting at 7200rpm. Was a stock 99 ls1 bottom end, untouched except for cam, new ls6 oil pump, and rollmaster timing chain.
That engine did 70,000 miles. Street, track, I abused it regularly. It never broke.
Can you pull the the engine and trans together like you could on the older Camaros and Chevelles? Or do you have to separate them to get them both out? (Trans below and engine up top)
#28
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Probably would be cheaper just to pull my 4L60E and find a good rebuild kit and rebuild it and put it back in with a 3200-3600 stall. It is my project car, so it isn’t going to be my daily driver.
Dont some people replace the 4L60E with a 4L80E? Isn’t that like going from a TH350 to a TH400? Anything special need to be done to swap the 4L60E for the 4L80E? Or is it a direct swap/fit?
#29
On The Tree
Thread Starter
I know my 07 Tahoe 5.3 at 161k actually looked pretty darn good when I took those heads off. I was surprised. I expected it to be a disaster at 161k. LOL! So hopefully this engine will look even better.
#31
No doubt an LS3 has more head room for power than an LS1. With that said, for your power goals, an LS1 can provide just that and then some. The better cylinder head will afford you not having to go to a 230 range cam to achieve good explosive power.
#32
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes
on
1,152 Posts
Originally Posted by Z28_Demon
But didn’t you say yours blew up? :-o
#33
TECH Resident
There's quite a few people on here with over 200k miles that never got deeper into their engine than an oil pump. Just remember to do valvetrain as a set and don't go for the high volume oil pump with the stock pan and you're good for a lot more miles. The most common killers are oil starvation and water in the rear cylinders from an intake leak under the cowl. Plus bad maintenance or upgrades of course which are common problems for all engines.
#34
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
After reading the thread here's my cliff notes
Cam that motor. Don't open up or rebuild the bottom end. Nothing wrong with camming a 200k motor, a 117k motor is just getting broke in.
DO A STALL in that car with a cam and those memories of how fun/fast the 2010 6 speed car was will quickly fade
I would plan on doing ported heads, cam, intake, long tube headers, true dual 3" exhaust and a 3600-4000 stall. My last stall was a 3600 that flashed to 4100 so if it's a toy go for a 4000. If it's a daily maybe keep it at a 3600, or go 4000 anyway. I did and I drove at least 500 miles a week with mine, sometimes over 1000 miles a week and did that for over a year.
With the above combo I mentioned you'll go from upper 13's to low 11's or upper 10's on a really well put together combo.
Cam that motor. Don't open up or rebuild the bottom end. Nothing wrong with camming a 200k motor, a 117k motor is just getting broke in.
DO A STALL in that car with a cam and those memories of how fun/fast the 2010 6 speed car was will quickly fade
I would plan on doing ported heads, cam, intake, long tube headers, true dual 3" exhaust and a 3600-4000 stall. My last stall was a 3600 that flashed to 4100 so if it's a toy go for a 4000. If it's a daily maybe keep it at a 3600, or go 4000 anyway. I did and I drove at least 500 miles a week with mine, sometimes over 1000 miles a week and did that for over a year.
With the above combo I mentioned you'll go from upper 13's to low 11's or upper 10's on a really well put together combo.
#35
On The Tree
Thread Starter
because I took it to 539 rwhp and revved to 7600 a LOT. and it did not blow up. It was burning a quart every few hundred miles and I found a crack in the rear of the block because I likely hydro-d a head bolt hole from not cleaning it out properly. Without that head bolt hole thing I could have re-ringed, rebearinged, and sent it.
However I do like the info that Launch proposed in an earlier post in the thread. That seems doable for me, price wise anyway. It looks like getting 5.3 PRC heads is about $1200 outright or $950 if I send them my castings. Problem is, I don't know what castings I have on my LS1. Is there an easy way to find out while the engine is still in the car without taking the valve covers off? If so, I can look it up. As I mentioned, he said something about the 5.3 PRC heads. They also give an option of 58 to 62cc heads. I'm not sure which would be best. I don't want to go with the 58cc heads and find out that a big cam will hit the pistons. :-/ Then again, I don't want to go with 62cc heads if I can get a bit more power by having a smaller combustion chamber.
Again, that all depends also on what set of heads I have on my LS1. If those are basically the same and I can send them into Texas Speed to have stage 2.5 work done on them and it costs less than buying the 5.3 heads outright, then I might as well do that. But if the 5.3 heads are more beneficial, then I'll save up for those, purchase them and then maybe sell my stock LS1 heads when I pull them.
#36
On The Tree
Thread Starter
There's quite a few people on here with over 200k miles that never got deeper into their engine than an oil pump. Just remember to do valvetrain as a set and don't go for the high volume oil pump with the stock pan and you're good for a lot more miles. The most common killers are oil starvation and water in the rear cylinders from an intake leak under the cowl. Plus bad maintenance or upgrades of course which are common problems for all engines.
Question - Why is it a problem going with a high volume oil pump with the stock pan? I figured since I'll be in there, I was going to replace the oil pump anyway, so should I just stay with the stock oil pump (but new, of course)? Of course in all older SBC/BBC, I always replaced the oil pumps with high volume/high pressure pumps. But again, the LS lineup is new to me, so I want to make sure I check into all of this info first rather than cry later after something gets screwed up. Normally I would think a high volume pump would be good, but not in this case? If oil starvation is a normal killer for the LSx engine, then why would I not be getting a high volume pump? (sorry, truly asking, not trying to be an arsehole about it)
From the info I've seen here thus far, I would like to do a pretty decent big cam (even possibly the cam that 98CayenneT/A is running, if it will fit with "stock" heads and head gaskets) and then get my heads done or get a set of the 5.3 heads from Texas Speed and then get new valve springs to match the cam, of course.
#37
On The Tree
Thread Starter
After reading the thread here's my cliff notes
Cam that motor. Don't open up or rebuild the bottom end. Nothing wrong with camming a 200k motor, a 117k motor is just getting broke in.
DO A STALL in that car with a cam and those memories of how fun/fast the 2010 6 speed car was will quickly fade
I would plan on doing ported heads, cam, intake, long tube headers, true dual 3" exhaust and a 3600-4000 stall. My last stall was a 3600 that flashed to 4100 so if it's a toy go for a 4000. If it's a daily maybe keep it at a 3600, or go 4000 anyway. I did and I drove at least 500 miles a week with mine, sometimes over 1000 miles a week and did that for over a year.
With the above combo I mentioned you'll go from upper 13's to low 11's or upper 10's on a really well put together combo.
Cam that motor. Don't open up or rebuild the bottom end. Nothing wrong with camming a 200k motor, a 117k motor is just getting broke in.
DO A STALL in that car with a cam and those memories of how fun/fast the 2010 6 speed car was will quickly fade
I would plan on doing ported heads, cam, intake, long tube headers, true dual 3" exhaust and a 3600-4000 stall. My last stall was a 3600 that flashed to 4100 so if it's a toy go for a 4000. If it's a daily maybe keep it at a 3600, or go 4000 anyway. I did and I drove at least 500 miles a week with mine, sometimes over 1000 miles a week and did that for over a year.
With the above combo I mentioned you'll go from upper 13's to low 11's or upper 10's on a really well put together combo.
Also, I have the SS hood (came with the car, but I like it), but I'm pretty sure I don't have the functionality of it. So, I'm wondering if it is better to try and buy the parts to make that SS hood ram air functional or go with a different type of CAI.
Wow, a 4000 stall...that will be different. I think the last time I built up a 454, I only put in a 2800 or 3200 stall in front of a TH350. So a 4000 stall seems outrageous to me, but everyone appears to be suggesting 3600 and up for decently cammed LS. So, I can dig it. It's not going to be a daily driver, just to fun car things and to work once in a while to annoy people. LOL What RPM is "normal" for people to rev LS1's up to? Obviously it shows like 5800 on the tach on the dash, but I sure as heck have seen videos on here (Cayenne, for example) that go up way past 5800. Is 7000 a truly acceptable number with a cammed car with a stock bottom end? Or are you guys just crazy and are waiting for it to let go at any second? LOL!!!!
Sorry for all of the questions to everyone, but honestly this thread already has helped me a ton and given me ideas on how to get things going in the right direction for the build. Plus, I may even be able to complete it faster with everyone's helpful suggestions here. So, thank you to everyone. I truly appreciate it.
#38
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes
on
1,152 Posts
However I do like the info that Launch proposed in an earlier post in the thread. That seems doable for me, price wise anyway. It looks like getting 5.3 PRC heads is about $1200 outright or $950 if I send them my castings. Problem is, I don't know what castings I have on my LS1. Is there an easy way to find out while the engine is still in the car without taking the valve covers off? If so, I can look it up. As I mentioned, he said something about the 5.3 PRC heads. They also give an option of 58 to 62cc heads. I'm not sure which would be best. I don't want to go with the 58cc heads and find out that a big cam will hit the pistons. :-/ Then again, I don't want to go with 62cc heads if I can get a bit more power by having a smaller combustion chamber.
Again, that all depends also on what set of heads I have on my LS1. If those are basically the same and I can send them into Texas Speed to have stage 2.5 work done on them and it costs less than buying the 5.3 heads outright, then I might as well do that. But if the 5.3 heads are more beneficial, then I'll save up for those, purchase them and then maybe sell my stock LS1 heads when I pull them.
#39
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
Bammax - Thanks for the info. Sounds like I'll be leaving the bottom end alone except for scoping it and doing a leakdown test to be sure.
Question - Why is it a problem going with a high volume oil pump with the stock pan? I figured since I'll be in there, I was going to replace the oil pump anyway, so should I just stay with the stock oil pump (but new, of course)? Of course in all older SBC/BBC, I always replaced the oil pumps with high volume/high pressure pumps. But again, the LS lineup is new to me, so I want to make sure I check into all of this info first rather than cry later after something gets screwed up. Normally I would think a high volume pump would be good, but not in this case? If oil starvation is a normal killer for the LSx engine, then why would I not be getting a high volume pump? (sorry, truly asking, not trying to be an arsehole about it)
From the info I've seen here thus far, I would like to do a pretty decent big cam (even possibly the cam that 98CayenneT/A is running, if it will fit with "stock" heads and head gaskets) and then get my heads done or get a set of the 5.3 heads from Texas Speed and then get new valve springs to match the cam, of course.
Question - Why is it a problem going with a high volume oil pump with the stock pan? I figured since I'll be in there, I was going to replace the oil pump anyway, so should I just stay with the stock oil pump (but new, of course)? Of course in all older SBC/BBC, I always replaced the oil pumps with high volume/high pressure pumps. But again, the LS lineup is new to me, so I want to make sure I check into all of this info first rather than cry later after something gets screwed up. Normally I would think a high volume pump would be good, but not in this case? If oil starvation is a normal killer for the LSx engine, then why would I not be getting a high volume pump? (sorry, truly asking, not trying to be an arsehole about it)
From the info I've seen here thus far, I would like to do a pretty decent big cam (even possibly the cam that 98CayenneT/A is running, if it will fit with "stock" heads and head gaskets) and then get my heads done or get a set of the 5.3 heads from Texas Speed and then get new valve springs to match the cam, of course.
edit...And to add to this discussion, the Achilles heel of the LS platform is the oiling system. These engines are not priority main oiling. In fact the mains/rods get oiled last, which is another reason I don’t mind pushing a little more oil through.
#40
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes
on
1,152 Posts
I run high pressure standard volume. I'm always worried about draining the sump with a high volume pump at RPM.