Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PTV - Clay Method

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2019 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default PTV - Clay Method

Ive searched and searched, but I would really appreciate some clarification.

I am checking PTV via clay - this is how I have been doing it (using a ls7 modified "solid" lifter):
1) Install checking springs
2) clay piston
3) tighten head
4) Using adjustable pushrod, find zero lash on the base circle with the non-adjustable rocker tightened down
5) Rotate motor
6) cut clay with a razor and measure thinnest point with a micrometer

There seems to be a lot of conflicting info surrounding the utilization of an adjustable pushrod/checking springs. Am I right to assume the adjustable pushrod will collapse under the load of a dual spring? This concern is what has led me to utilize the checking springs. I was utilizing checking springs with hydraulic lifters when claying the motor, but everyone seems to say that method doesn't produce accurate results - if that's true, then what's the point of checking springs?

Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2019 | 09:54 PM
  #2  
98CayenneT/A's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,913
Likes: 366
From: White Bear, Mn
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ve-method.html
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2019 | 09:57 PM
  #3  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by 93Rat
Ive searched and searched, but I would really appreciate some clarification.

I am checking PTV via clay - this is how I have been doing it (using a ls7 modified "solid" lifter):
1) Install checking springs
2) clay piston
3) tighten head
4) Using adjustable pushrod, find zero lash on the base circle with the non-adjustable rocker tightened down
5) Rotate motor
6) cut clay with a razor and measure thinnest point with a micrometer

There seems to be a lot of conflicting info surrounding the utilization of an adjustable pushrod/checking springs. Am I right to assume the adjustable pushrod will collapse under the load of a dual spring? This concern is what has led me to utilize the checking springs. I was utilizing checking springs with hydraulic lifters when claying the motor, but everyone seems to say that method doesn't produce accurate results - if that's true, then what's the point of checking springs?

Thanks in advance.
Adjustable pushrod will bend with dual springs. You are doing this correctly. Same method I and many other use. Check springs makes the process easier on cam bearings, and it’s easier to turn engine over also. Is your camshaft degreed, or set to wher you want it?
Are you using mock-up head gaskets or new head gaskets?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2019 | 10:07 PM
  #4  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Adjustable pushrod will bend with dual springs. You are doing this correctly. Same method I and many other use. Check springs makes the process easier on cam bearings, and it’s easier to turn engine over also. Is your camshaft degreed, or set to wher you want it?
Are you using mock-up head gaskets or new head gaskets?
Well that's good to know, thanks. I am using previously compressed MLS gaskets - I will be running new MLS gaskets.

I have tried to study how to degree a cam, but every time I try to understand the process the video/thread online loses me, and none of my friends have the knowledge to show me hands on. So, Im running dot to dot. I know that isn't the preferred method, but its the best I can do at the moment.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2019 | 06:22 AM
  #5  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by 93Rat
Well that's good to know, thanks. I am using previously compressed MLS gaskets - I will be running new MLS gaskets.

I have tried to study how to degree a cam, but every time I try to understand the process the video/thread online loses me, and none of my friends have the knowledge to show me hands on. So, Im running dot to dot. I know that isn't the preferred method, but its the best I can do at the moment.
Dot 2 dot is fine as long as the camshaft was ground properly. You don’t have to torque the headbolts with this procedure, using a compressed gasket. Just get the 4 around the cylinder your checking good and snug. Saves wear and tear on both the block threads and the head bolts. You re-using GM headbolts or using ARP head bolts?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2019 | 06:28 AM
  #6  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Dot 2 dot is fine as long as the camshaft was ground properly. You don’t have to torque the headbolts with this procedure, using a compressed gasket. Just get the 4 around the cylinder your checking good and snug. Saves wear and tear on both the block threads and the head bolts. You re-using GM headbolts or using ARP head bolts?
To your point, I’m using 4 GM head bolts on the cylinder in question, snugging them only. I’m using arp head studs for actual assembly.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2019 | 06:35 AM
  #7  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by 93Rat
To your point, I’m using 4 GM head bolts on the cylinder in question, snugging them only. I’m using arp head studs for actual assembly.
Sounds good man. Measure those pushrods!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2019 | 07:31 AM
  #8  
RB04Av's Avatar
TECH Addict
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 958
Default

You don't need to "torque" the head(s) down for this process. The change in the dimensions of the head casting due to bolt torque is negligible for the purpose at hand. Tightening the bolts enough that the head is firmly held in place ("snug" is entirely adequate.

You can use any number of things to simulate the head gasket. Washers, shim stock, even an old CD, depending on the thickness of the intended gasket. Again, the .001" or 2 of variation between this and your final build, are negligible compared to the numbers you're looking for.

Check springs are fine. You don't need full spring tension on the push rod for this.

Dot-to-dot is the usual relationship to build a motor at. It's actually NOT #1 firing however; it's #6 firing, and the instance of #1 TDC at which the exh valve is just closing and the int is just opening. These 2 conditions occur at the same time. Both dots at 12:00 is #1 firing, and the instance of #6 TDC at which the exh valve is just closing and the int is just opening. Build the motor at dot-to-dot because it's easier to see; rotate the crank exactly 1 full revolution (exactly ½ of a cam revolution) to get from there to #1 firing. None of that matters for PTV checking though, except as far as assuring that the cam is timed to the crank correctly... put it together dot-to-dot and rotate the motor several turns to create the clay impression.

Not sure what's hard about degreeing a cam... what part of it is giving you trouble?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2019 | 10:50 AM
  #9  
patSS/00's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 17
From: AZ
Default

Why use a head gasket at all? Just add the thickness of the gasket you're going to use to the measurement.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2019 | 05:58 PM
  #10  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by patSS/00
Why use a head gasket at all? Just add the thickness of the gasket you're going to use to the measurement.
Because most of the time on an LS build, the piston comes out of the hole. Engine won’t turn over when piston hits the head.
I use .030” valve spring shims around the cylinder I’m measuring, and set 2 shims on end of deck to keep head level. Head bolt goes through center hole of valve shim. Easy peasy. Shim measures exactly .030” so I know I have a constant to do my math from, according to what dimension headgasket I’m using for each particular build.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2019 | 12:25 PM
  #11  
93Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RB04Av
You don't need to "torque" the head(s) down for this process. The change in the dimensions of the head casting due to bolt torque is negligible for the purpose at hand. Tightening the bolts enough that the head is firmly held in place ("snug" is entirely adequate.

You can use any number of things to simulate the head gasket. Washers, shim stock, even an old CD, depending on the thickness of the intended gasket. Again, the .001" or 2 of variation between this and your final build, are negligible compared to the numbers you're looking for.

Check springs are fine. You don't need full spring tension on the push rod for this.

Dot-to-dot is the usual relationship to build a motor at. It's actually NOT #1 firing however; it's #6 firing, and the instance of #1 TDC at which the exh valve is just closing and the int is just opening. These 2 conditions occur at the same time. Both dots at 12:00 is #1 firing, and the instance of #6 TDC at which the exh valve is just closing and the int is just opening. Build the motor at dot-to-dot because it's easier to see; rotate the crank exactly 1 full revolution (exactly ½ of a cam revolution) to get from there to #1 firing. None of that matters for PTV checking though, except as far as assuring that the cam is timed to the crank correctly... put it together dot-to-dot and rotate the motor several turns to create the clay impression.

Not sure what's hard about degreeing a cam... what part of it is giving you trouble?
Yes, I understand the 4 strokes (that is not intended to be condescending). In regards to degreeing a cam, Im sure it is not complicated, but every time I have tried to read and understand the process the video/thread loses me. Technical processes like this can be difficult to communicate via the internet. I haven't taken a stab at it in roughly a year. Maybe its time I try and revisit it.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2019 | 03:48 PM
  #12  
LilJayV10's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 998
From: Evansville,IN
Default

For me personally using the ICL degreeing method is the easiest. I'm pretty sure Comp Cam's(along with many others probably)have a good video on it.

Once you find true TDC, it's not too difficult.

Find max lift, zero the dial indicator out, back up to .100 before max lift, then move forward to .050(this takes the slack out of the chain) write down the degrees, then go .050 past max lift(slack is already out of the chain), write down the degrees. Add together and divide in half. That's your ICL.

If you are degreeing the cam, that has/should be done before checking PTV. You can advance/retard the cam timing to give you more PTV, however at the moment I can't remember which way to go to get more.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2019 | 01:01 AM
  #13  
patSS/00's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 17
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by LilJayV10
If you are degreeing the cam, that has/should be done before checking PTV. You can advance/retard the cam timing to give you more PTV, however at the moment I can't remember which way to go to get more.
Advance gives more exhaust PTV and less intake PTV.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.