Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.8l/5.3l Combustion Chamber Dimensions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2019 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
ScottNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default 4.8l/5.3l Combustion Chamber Dimensions

Hey guys, first time poster.

Planning out a little project at the moment and was wondering if anyone has a 4.8/5.3 head around and would be able to measure the diameter of the combustion chamber or even the valve spacing.

Looking at the possibility of sleeving a 5.3 block to meet class regulations regarding capacity - so just checking to see what clearance I have before going down that path.

Thanks team
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2019 | 06:25 PM
  #2  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

You mean the dimension at the widest point? Combustion chambers are not round, so no diameter. Also, the valve spacing is the same for all cathedral heads.
What capacity is required by the class you're contemplating?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2019 | 08:27 PM
  #3  
ScottNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah talking about the measurement at its widest point - I should have chosen my wording better!

Think I seen somewhere else on the forum that the valve spacing for the cathedral port LS1 is 1.91"

4.5l or 275ci is max capacity permitted - by the looks sleeving alone isnt going to be able to take it back that far so an offset ground crank might be the go or a combonation of the two.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2019 | 09:07 PM
  #4  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 531
From: Dallas
Default

Not sure about valve spacing.

Found this on the internetz

Can't post the link because we aren't supposed to post non sponsor links but in the hot rod article it says it measures 3.756 across. And they put this picture in there.

The article is called "Surprising HP Numbers From Our Stock LS Cylinder Head Test". Copy and paste that into google and you should find the article easily.


If I had to bet I would say the offset grind is what'll do the trick, I don't think you'll be able to get the sleeve or piston size you need to reduce the bore size enough to meet your requirement.

If you don't already know the 4.8 and 5.3 use the same bore but the 4.8 crank is smaller so you would want to start with a 4.8 crank. It's a 3.268" vs 3.622". Looks like you can go as high as 3.06 with a 3.78 bore and have a 274.72. Not sure if they can take that much off that isn't really my field.

This is a tough one. A gen 5 4.3 would be sweet though for requirements and having late model tech

I don't have a head to check or I would measure it, I have dial calipers etc, but no heads laying around.


Last edited by 00pooterSS; Aug 29, 2019 at 09:19 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2019 | 06:45 AM
  #5  
Ls7colorado's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 609
From: Henderson, TN
Default

This stuff always blows my mind, why do people have certain classes that require you to spend WAY more money to have LESS power?
I dont understand
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2019 | 02:16 PM
  #6  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 531
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Ls7colorado
This stuff always blows my mind, why do people have certain classes that require you to spend WAY more money to have LESS power?
I dont understand
I agree, but to each their own.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2019 | 10:36 PM
  #7  
ScottNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
I agree, but to each their own.
Yeah its just one of those things unfortunately - original rules were probably written up 40 years ago with other motors in mind.
Thanks for the help guys.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.