*Cam opinion's and advice*




"Maximum Effort STRIP Car..... This will have a HEAVY Lope at idle".
LOL, this is about a 12 on your 1-10 scale.
With your current heads Titan 4 Cam,FAST 92/90, 1 7/8" LTs and True Duals (just remembered)
you have enough power for Mid 11s (with traction and suspension) in decent DA/conditions and still a very
fun car to drive on the street.
The Titan 5 would be about ~9 on your scale.
Titan King Too Big IMO based on your stated goals.
Killer with Aftermarket Heads & MMS MSD & 4.30:1 + for a Max Effort Race Car.
Just my .02
Last edited by NAVYBLUE210; Jul 13, 2020 at 02:09 PM.
"Maximum Effort STRIP Car..... This will have a HEAVY Lope at idle.
LOL, this is about a 12 on your 1-10 scale.
With your current heads Titan 4 Cam,FAST 92/90, 1 7/8" LTs and a GOOD Y (don't choke the exhaust)
you have enough power for Mid 11s (with traction and suspension) in decent DA/conditions and still a very
fun car to drive on the street.
The Titan 5 would be about ~9 on your scale.
Titan King Too Big IMO based on your stated goals.
Killer with Aftermarket Heads & MMS MSD & 4.30:1 + for a Max Effort Race Car.
Just my .02
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time




While this can trade off some power and snap vs the gentler profile (that is only with enough spring pressure to insure proper valve control) what you gain is greater valve spring life and smoother quieter operation (less ticking) all else being equal.
One of my pet peeves is when I see a Cam specced for a NA application where the EXHAUST LIFT is greater than the Intake Lift.
According to Darrin Morgan one of the Top Cylinder Head Designers/Porters, the valve lift should be a % of the valve diameter, as this relates to curtain area for ideal/optimum Intake Port flow & velocity, and since the Intake Valves are significantly larger they should have greater lift.
I look at any performance NA cam with more exhaust lift VS Intake as FAIL. But that is just me.
Good friend of mine had the Titan 4 in a 5.7 11.7:1 compression with ported 243s, turbo 350, 2800 stall and 3.55:1 in a Fox Mustang
with a short runner sheet metal intake it RIPPED! and had excellent street manners, Your 4 speed, 4000 stall and 3.90s with
a FAST 92 would exceed that everywhere up to 6500+ RPM.
If you mill your heads slightly and adjust quench between .035-.040 with 11.0-11.5: comp (91-93 OCTANE)
you will have EXACTLY what you want.
My last .02
Good Luck
Last edited by NAVYBLUE210; Jul 14, 2020 at 07:31 PM.
While this can trade off some power and snap vs the gentler profile (that is only with enough spring pressure to insure proper valve control) what you gain is greater valve spring life and smoother quieter operation (less ticking) all else being equal.
One of my pet peeves is when I see a Cam specced for a NA application where the EXHAUST LIFT is greater than the Intake Lift.
According to Darrin Morgan one of the Top Cylinder Head Designers/Porters, the valve lift should be a % of the valve diameter, as this relates to curtain area for ideal/optimum Intake Port flow & velocity, and since the Intake Valves are significantly larger they should have greater lift.
I look at any performance NA cam with more exhaust lift VS Intake as FAIL. But that is just me.
Good friend of mine had the Titan 4 in a 5.7 11.7:1 compression with ported 243s, turbo 350, 2800 stall and 3.55:1 in a Fox Mustang
with a short runner sheet metal intake it RIPPED! and had excellent street manners, Your 4 speed, 4000 stall and 3.90s with
a FAST 92 would exceed that everywhere up to 6500+ RPM.
If you mill your heads slightly and adjust quench between .035-.040 with 11.0-11.5: comp (91-93 OCTANE)
you will have EXACTLY what you want.
My last .02
Good Luck
Thanks again
I suspect you're a far better driver...







