Ls9 lifters in LS1?
When using your Compression Calculator (had lots of fun with this too!), to get the factory-spec LM7 compression of 9.5:1, I need to use zero deck clearance.
Yet I hear repeatedly that most LS engines have about a -.005-6 spec.
That makes a big diff when figuring quench! What's the correct answer here?
If I use -.005 deck clearance, I would need a .045 gasket to get .040 quench (middle of suggested quench range).
If I use zero deck clearance, a .040 gasket is called for to get the same quench.
Also- Should one err to the low side of the quench range (.035 out of .035-.045) or go to the high side (.045)?
Edit- your article answered the above question- Quench should be as tight as possible.
Okay great so is stock ls1 lifter trays acceptable with LS7 Summit lifters? That was my real question.
Okay great! So LS7 summit lifters with ls2 lifter trays? This is my first time taking cylinder heads off & replacing lifters that’s why I’m asking so many questions.
To the op. The morel drop in lifters are good to go. Upgrade over the ls7 lifters and the morels can take the higher spring pressures
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
When using your Compression Calculator (had lots of fun with this too!), to get the factory-spec LM7 compression of 9.5:1, I need to use zero deck clearance.
Yet I hear repeatedly that most LS engines have about a -.005-6 spec.
That makes a big diff when figuring quench! What's the correct answer here?
When using your Compression Calculator (had lots of fun with this too!), to get the factory-spec LM7 compression of 9.5:1, I need to use zero deck clearance.
Yet I hear repeatedly that most LS engines have about a -.005-6 spec.
That makes a big diff when figuring quench! What's the correct answer here?
The answer here is the ol' "It depends". Here's what we mean. The GM compression ratio spec for the LM7 is 9.5:1. However, we know that there is a tolerance built-in for every component that determines an engine's compression ratio. Plus, with manufacturing at scale, some engines will leave with a slightly higher or lower compression than the published spec.
When we talk about performance engine building, we can better control the end results. While our Help Center lists the GM spec, once you start measuring engine components we see that reality doesn’t necessarily match the published spec. The good news is we can take steps to modify components or select components to control the desired outcome.
Similar to us recommending measuring for proper pushrod length, trying to hit a specific quench number will be the same. You’ll need to measure your deck clearance so the gasket can be matched as closely as possible.
The answer here is the ol' "It depends". Here's what we mean. The GM compression ratio spec for the LM7 is 9.5:1. However, we know that there is a tolerance built-in for every component that determines an engine's compression ratio. Plus, with manufacturing at scale, some engines will leave with a slightly higher or lower compression than the published spec.
When we talk about performance engine building, we can better control the end results. While our Help Center lists the GM spec, once you start measuring engine components we see that reality doesn’t necessarily match the published spec. The good news is we can take steps to modify components or select components to control the desired outcome.
Similar to us recommending measuring for proper pushrod length, trying to hit a specific quench number will be the same. You’ll need to measure your deck clearance so the gasket can be matched as closely as possible.
It sounds like a fairly wide range of tolerance on deck clearance, as would be expected in a mass production scenario. AwesomeAuto (OK name, but I liked Joe Nova better...lol) has a good common-sense answer with the .004 "common sense" plug-in number. I think I'll borrow it for future calcs, if you don't mind.
Again, thank you both for the info, especially from trusted names here!











