Is This A Decent Cam For Daily Driver Status?
224/230 .553/.553 111+2 Heres the link: https://speed-engineering.com/produc...nd-warrior-cam
The bad news.. I called them this morning just to confirm that I have the specs correct and they told me that cam is on back order and they don't have it in stock.. He thinks... he said they see a part # in their computer that supercedes this cams part # but that I should wait to see an e-mail that they send me about if they have it or not.
I know that some of you have cam calculators and can figure out the over-lap. Can someone post the over-lap on this cam, and also your thoughts on how it will perform? The duration numbers are fairly tame, along with the lift, and... showing my ignorance here... what does the +3 represent AFTER the 111????
Last edited by Kawabuggy; Mar 25, 2022 at 10:37 AM.
5 degrees overlap
111+2 means 2 degrees of advance were ground into the cam when it was made. That's fairly typical.
That Warrior 224/230 on 111 will be way better choice than the Stage 4.
BTW - pretty much an LS can be tuned to lope etc even a stock cam if it's all about sound effects.
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; Mar 25, 2022 at 11:39 AM.
That Warrior 224/230 on 111 will be way better choice than the Stage 4.
And you can find videos of it showing it lopes pretty well even in a 6.0L.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The only reasons I took exception in this particular case, was because there is enough dyno comparison (including independent testing) out there and now enough people using them, to understand how it'll behave for driveability and it's power range. Plus you can at least get an idea (although one video shows they list 107.5, while it's advertised as a 107) how much overlap is, and unless it's ground retarded you can estimate the max IVC. But preferably I'd like it to be more transparent, and knowing the EVO would be helpful. Especially if considering it for non-NA applications. There's just not a lot of shelf cams that fit the main criteria the OP wants. Personally it's not my cup of tea anyway, because "sound" is not important to me like other factors. But it works for the big-thump...won't see much past 6k crowd.
Hopefully now that they've gotten their initial sales off to a good start and as more and more are out there, they'll either share the complete specs themselves, or someone else will. They've jacked up their price now to a point at which you could order your own custom ground camshaft from a vendor on here for almost the same, and know what you're getting.
Besides there's a lot more to lobe profiles than just valve events at .050" and advertised, so makes little sense to hide those basic numbers other than to get a jump on the competition.
Last edited by 68Formula; Mar 26, 2022 at 09:04 AM.
Wink...I agree 👍, if they can't share the specs then I can't buy the cam.
The perfect cam for your application, the Neu Uber Cam the specs are xxx/xxx .xxx/.xxx on a xxx+x LSA. We keep no secrets from our competitors just our customers. It boosts low rpm torque and easily pulls to x,xxx rpm as designed. Perfectly matched to an x,xxx rpm aftermarket stall converter and x.xx gears! We normally see xx wheel hp gain & xx wheel torque gain! It's also more efficient boosting mpg by x.x miles per gallon! The Neu Uber Cam is only $575 and on sale today only with fee based shipping plus sales tax!
I had a cam with very similar events to the Ghost Cam (lower IVC actually) and it was not good for low down or top end in my M6 car. I hated it. So, I went to a smaller TSP cam (high lift, I see no reason to run low lift cams) and was very pleased by the improvement. It has 38 IVC but I'm thinking about advancing it to bring it down to 36 but I think 34 or 35 may have been ideal.
If you also want thump, you're in luck, you can run more duration (especially in a 6.0) and still achieve the same goals, overlap being the key here. I needed -6 or similar to achieve my goals, not an issue if you crave the thump!
Last edited by Pulse Red; Mar 27, 2022 at 12:44 AM.












