Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Question> 7.400 pushrod is 7.417 ??

Old Nov 4, 2024 | 07:42 PM
  #1  
gMAG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 4
From: CT
Default Question> 7.400 pushrod is 7.417 ??

In verifying existing pushrod length, I was reacquainted with LS1 pushrods being .017 longer than their advertised length. This .017 is never referred to.in any of the YT "measure for pushrod length" videos, though prominent reputable businesses such as, Thompson, Brian Tooley, Summit, etc, create the videos. Is this 17 a built in extra to compensate for hot engine expansion? This presents a problem... When I use my adjustable pushrod length checker, and come up with, say, 7.400 (verified with dig caliper), this length would include the tip to tip size of the checker, Yet, if I order a 7.400, I get 7.417. If it's not to account for expansion, does the .017 count toward lifter preload? for example, (.017) > If for preload and not expansion... having measured for zero lash, I come up with 7.325. Then add .075 for preload, minus .the 017 extra from the pushrod tip(s). ...or, is the 17 "invisible" to valve function? Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2024 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by gMAG
In verifying existing pushrod length, I was reacquainted with LS1 pushrods being .017 longer than their advertised length. This .017 is never referred to.in any of the YT "measure for pushrod length" videos, though prominent reputable businesses such as, Thompson, Brian Tooley, Summit, etc, create the videos. Is this 17 a built in extra to compensate for hot engine expansion? This presents a problem... When I use my adjustable pushrod length checker, and come up with, say, 7.400 (verified with dig caliper), this length would include the tip to tip size of the checker, Yet, if I order a 7.400, I get 7.417. If it's not to account for expansion, does the .017 count toward lifter preload? for example, (.017) > If for preload and not expansion... having measured for zero lash, I come up with 7.325. Then add .075 for preload, minus .the 017 extra from the pushrod tip(s). ...or, is the 17 "invisible" to valve function? Thanks
Glenn, it’s good to see you on here. Basically in a nutshell for the sake of simplicity, an LS7 lifter will never see the .017 difference. The truth is most folks don’t measure their pushrods when they show up, so a lot of the time there’s more than .017 error in pushrod lengths anyway. The LS7 lifter has a BIG window of preload, so it’s not an issue. Now…when you get into limited travel lifters with .035 preload windows…then it absolutely matters.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2024 | 09:28 PM
  #3  
gMAG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 4
From: CT
Default

Thank you, Scott. 10 years go by, and suddenly, I'm "grandpa". From a different angle, considering the added .017, and added .075 preload, I would be headed toward what might be the high end of preload for these lifters/Comp 850s. I've saved the original, existing measurements, and will review everything. i'm using a couple of different-sized, but closely-sized pushrods, because the engine had some water in it upon arrival, and certain valves had to be replaced. There is some valve train noise on certain cylinders after full warmup, which disappears with throttle. This is accented by a rear-facing hood scoop, which amplifies the noise,
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2024 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by gMAG
Thank you, Scott. 10 years go by, and suddenly, I'm "grandpa". From a different angle, considering the added .017, and added .075 preload, I would be headed toward what might be the high end of preload for these lifters/Comp 850s. I've saved the original, existing measurements, and will review everything. i'm using a couple of different-sized, but closely-sized pushrods, because the engine had some water in it upon arrival, and certain valves had to be replaced. There is some valve train noise on certain cylinders after full warmup, which disappears with throttle. This is accented by a rear-facing hood scoop, which amplifies the noise,
Glenn, when valves were replaced, were the valve heights confirmed to be correct across the head? It’s part of the valvejob if done correctly. If those heights vary ANY, there will be discrepancies in pushrod length from valve to valve. Congrats on the Grandpa thing!
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2024 | 06:39 PM
  #5  
Floorman279's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,699
Likes: 168
From: Wilmington, DE
Default

What is the total travel on the lifters. Generally half the total lifter travel is your target. Also the larger your total travel, the more leeway you have on the preload number.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2024 | 07:54 PM
  #6  
the_merv's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 21,019
Likes: 891
From: The Beach...
Default

Yup, what's the threshold you have to work with.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2024 | 11:25 AM
  #7  
gMAG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 4
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by the_merv
Yup, what's the threshold you have to work with.
The 850 lifters go .200 travel. Preload target is .075.
Here is the issue.. there are several pushrods that, because pushrods generally are offered in only .025 increments, fall short of the .075 target. Add a hot engine, and there is ticking/sewing/etc, introduced at low RPM.
I'm ok with being over the target, and not ok with being under by these (cold) amounts... generally, several, .019 short of .075 + hot engine. The next step up is 7.450, which is too long.
I happened upon an old thread (mine) that addressed this. The replies suggested Manton Pushrods, so, a call to Manton put me in touch with their machinist/tech, who said that when I order a, For Example, 7.400, that his finished product, end to end, is 7.400. I told him that the caliper measurement of a TR 7.400 actually is 7.417, which is true of any common LS pushrod. He replied that Manton doesn't consider the extra .017, so that when they manufacture a 7.400, that end-to-end is 7.400. This would leave me right back where I presently am.
At this, he balked, and rather than say, "Ok, we'll add .017 to each of your stated lengths, and this will put us in agreement", I suggested it, which would have solved our disagreement.
Again, he balked at this, and I decided to let it go.
There is a good machine shop, nearby, and the person over there instantly knew what I was referring to, so I'll have him manufacture exactly what I need.
For the record, the existing lengths/combo, makes 418 whp, which is good for a modest TR 224 cam.
Thanks, everyone, for your experiences.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2024 | 06:16 AM
  #8  
LeiaJenkins's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gMAG
The 850 lifters go .200 travel. Preload target is .075.
Here is the issue.. there are several pushrods that, because pushrods generally are offered in only .025 increments, fall short of the .075 target. Add a hot engine, and there is ticking/sewing/etc, introduced at low RPM.
I'm ok with being over the target, and not ok with being under by these (cold) amounts... generally, several, .019 short of .075 + hot engine. The next step up is 7.450, which is too long.
I happened upon an old thread (mine) that addressed this. The replies suggested Manton Pushrods, so, a call to Manton put me in touch with their machinist/tech, who said that when I order a, For Example, 7.400, that his finished product, end to end, is 7.400. I told him that the caliper measurement of a TR 7.400 actually is 7.417, which is true of any common LS pushrod. He replied that Manton doesn't consider the extra .017, so that when they manufacture a 7.400, that end-to-end is 7.400. This would leave me right back where I presently am.
At this, he balked, and rather than say, "Ok, we'll add .017 to each of your stated lengths, and this will put us in agreement", I suggested it, which would have solved our disagreement.
Again, he balked at this, and I decided to let it go.
There is a good machine shop, nearby, and the person over there instantly knew what I was referring to, so I'll have him manufacture exactly what I need.
For the record, the existing lengths/combo, makes 418 whp, which is good for a modest TR 224 cam.
Thanks, everyone, for your experiences.
Thanks for the update.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.