ok this may get messy
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Who has proven to be the most consistant (in a good way) head porter to date? What i mean is who's heads flow pretty much the same from one set to another? I know i repeated myself, couldn't deside which one sounded better so i put both.
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Once you are using a CNC program, you will produce nearly identical numbers between sets of heads. However, most porters finish the heads by hand, therefore introducing a chance of variation. Provided, you have competent people doing the finishing work, the numbers should be pretty close. I have seen certain sponsors on here admit that there can be errors in the hand finishing process, and that if you see that on a flow bench, you can send them back and they'll fix them for you.
Trending Topics
#10
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mdhmi
"Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds". What about heads that are consistently bad? I would be inclined to get AFR, LPE, or MTI heads. I don't care about consistency. I care about proven numbers.
Mark
Mark
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)