TR224 - 112 or 114 LSA?
I have seen some dyno comparisons between the MTI T1 (112) and B1 (114) cams. Both cams produced almost identical power curves.
IMHO the 224 114 LSA will make slightly better power off-idle, below 2500 RPMs where most dyno pulls begin. Otherwise, the two cams are virtually identical.
The car does seem to "buck" a little bit around 1400 rpm around parking lots but its really no big deal, I'm hoping tuning can take care of that.
I think my car makes great power 3000 rpm and up and I have the stock 3.42's.
Go with the 112, you won't regret it! <img border="0" alt="[driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />
First: I think what always happened in the past went I pushed it that high, I was pulling my toe out of it a little (MY GOD THIS THING ITS SCARRY <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> ).
Second: I am getting a few degrees of knock and I'm a little off on the tuning so I'm bound to pull a little more out if it once I get on a dyno (speck 3 and aluminum flywheel go in next week and then its test time).
I take back what I said before....the car (and cam) are a scarry beast...it pulls well into the 6000 range....its the driver that needs to polish up the brass ones <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Chris
<small>[ April 08, 2003, 12:12 PM: Message edited by: 2001CamaroGuy ]</small>
but since i race my car almost every weekend as well as it being a daily driver i dont want to spin it too high but can tolerate or even enjoy a little lope at idle.so whats the deal with autos? are they stupid or something?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
but since i race my car almost every weekend as well as it being a daily driver i dont want to spin it too high but can tolerate or even enjoy a little lope at idle.so whats the deal with autos? are they stupid or something?



