Ed Curtis (EDC) cam specs
11-19-2004, 04:40 PM
#41
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Working in the shop 24/7
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Fandango
EDC You do any custom cams, right? Like solid roller BBC stuff too? I am thinking that once I save some moolah It will be time for a roller setup in my old '73 454. It has to get off the stand first though.
PM me please... Don't want to get busted by the forum police..
Ed
11-21-2004, 01:20 AM
#44
Originally Posted by jrp
and to let everybody in, i bet josh 10 bucks i'd put down more tq then him and at a lower RPM since he said "reverse splits" dont make **** for tq.
Remember .050" number don't mean jack........ 
11-21-2004, 03:46 AM
#46
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Who said it was a "reverse" split????? Remember .050" number don't mean jack........
Remember .050" number don't mean jack........ . i had my cam doctored 
and pulled the old motor out today, hopefully will have everthing done so it can be tuned after thanksgiving
11-22-2004, 06:42 AM
#50
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jammer
hmmm my reverse split made over 500 lbs tq...at the 55% throttle position
JRP, I've been following for a while... I can't wait to see your results
Maybe when I can afford good heads later I can get a "Gigantor" named after me, too
11-22-2004, 07:10 AM
#51
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having a more aggressive exhaust lobe goes against the convention of most top builders. Snapping the exhaust valve off the seat quicker doesn't do much for power. A slower lobe usually works better on the exhaust side.
This is of course assuming the more aggressive lift on the exhaust side is in fact a more aggressive lobe.
Maybe he is doing that to account for the reverse split.
Looking forward to seeing the results.
This is of course assuming the more aggressive lift on the exhaust side is in fact a more aggressive lobe.
Maybe he is doing that to account for the reverse split.
Looking forward to seeing the results.
I'd make a wager to say the intake lobe falls somewhere in between XE and XE-R though.
11-22-2004, 11:32 AM
#54
Originally Posted by Chris ARE 385
This is of course assuming the more aggressive lift on the exhaust side is in fact a more aggressive lobe.
Maybe he is doing that to account for the reverse split.
Looking forward to seeing the results.
Maybe he is doing that to account for the reverse split.
Looking forward to seeing the results.
11-22-2004, 01:17 PM
#55
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Most of this goes back to the "camshaft discussion" thread that was going a while back. Persoanlly, I don't believe the cam is "reverse" split. Lots of vendors make a softer/high lift lobe. I bet the advertised numbers look more like a conventional camshaft with anywhere from 0-4 degrees of foward split.
11-22-2004, 04:39 PM
#57
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Most of this goes back to the "camshaft discussion" thread that was going a while back. Persoanlly, I don't believe the cam is "reverse" split. Lots of vendors make a softer/high lift lobe. I bet the advertised numbers look more like a conventional camshaft with anywhere from 0-4 degrees of foward split.
11-22-2004, 04:42 PM
#58
Originally Posted by Chris ARE 385
Having a more aggressive exhaust lobe goes against the convention of most top builders. Snapping the exhaust valve off the seat quicker doesn't do much for power. A slower lobe usually works better on the exhaust side.
This is of course assuming the more aggressive lift on the exhaust side is in fact a more aggressive lobe.
Maybe he is doing that to account for the reverse split.
Looking forward to seeing the results.
This is of course assuming the more aggressive lift on the exhaust side is in fact a more aggressive lobe.
Maybe he is doing that to account for the reverse split.
Looking forward to seeing the results.
ed told me himself this is not a traditionaly designed ls1 cam.
11-22-2004, 09:10 PM
#59
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrp
i dont believe i stated the application yet, its open track and road racing. edd chose lobes that are not like the lobes used on "drag" racing cams. spring life and valve weight were also factors that went into it.
11-22-2004, 09:14 PM
#60
Originally Posted by 66deuce
it would be interesting to see what it does at the strip.any plans to run it in the 1/4 just to see what it will do?
. but dont expect much: first time out to the track + *** loads of power + 245 eagle GSC's + 10 bolt + shitty track = 
. im hoping to at least break into the 12's 
im really trying to get the car setup for willow springs