Vicni AFR 205 head ONLY test take 2
01-07-2005, 04:37 PM
#41
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SAM98WS6
whatever it is...Id run it through the compression calculator...but hell I dont know what all was done to that car. As long as its not stock the point is made. With only that info..I get 10.7:1...and roughly 5hp..less than I thought.
01-08-2005, 12:58 PM
#43
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THE mistake is saying AFRs were worth 40rwhp with no other changes to stock C5.
factory heads are 66.66cc I believe. So you can get you numbers straight.
http://camaroz28.com/services/calcs/
factory heads are 66.66cc I believe. So you can get you numbers straight.
http://camaroz28.com/services/calcs/
01-08-2005, 01:17 PM
#44
Originally Posted by SAM98WS6
THE mistake is saying AFRs were worth 40rwhp with no other changes to stock C5.
factory heads are 66.66cc I believe. So you can get you numbers straight.
http://camaroz28.com/services/calcs/
factory heads are 66.66cc I believe. So you can get you numbers straight.
http://camaroz28.com/services/calcs/
Dude, get over it. AFR heads work and are a worthy upgrade. PERIOD. Its been proven time and time again. Id have a set in a heartbeat if I had the $$$$.
01-08-2005, 02:34 PM
#46
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SAM98WS6
THE mistake is saying AFRs were worth 40rwhp with no other changes to stock C5.
factory heads are 66.66cc I believe. So you can get you numbers straight.
http://camaroz28.com/services/calcs/
factory heads are 66.66cc I believe. So you can get you numbers straight.
http://camaroz28.com/services/calcs/
01-08-2005, 02:43 PM
#47
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tinsel Town, USA
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrr23
ok timeslips are up. here you go. http://www.vincihighperformance.com/...T%20SLIPS.HTML
Last edited by wallstAL; 01-08-2005 at 02:53 PM.
01-21-2005, 07:53 AM
#50
Staging Lane
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Any news on VINCI cam with those heads??? I would be curious how a 047 performs.
02-04-2005, 05:34 PM
#53
Guess I'll answer my own question ... will get the unmilled AFR 205's 'cause JRP says so. I assume unmilled, unless I swap cams. This thread and JRP sold me on AFR 205's ... unmilled. Just gotta' figure out where the money will come from ... ain't happening this spring ...
04-04-2005, 11:16 PM
#55
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok some more test results. http://www.vincihighperformance.com/...CT%20PAGE.HTML
even a comp cam 220/224 .581/.581 115 LSA w/ vinci/crane 1.7 accelerated lift rockers vs the 055 216/224 .551/.551(1.7) 113LSA w/ vinci/crane 1.8 accelerated lift rockers(brings it to .583/.583).
even a comp cam 220/224 .581/.581 115 LSA w/ vinci/crane 1.7 accelerated lift rockers vs the 055 216/224 .551/.551(1.7) 113LSA w/ vinci/crane 1.8 accelerated lift rockers(brings it to .583/.583).
04-05-2005, 05:43 AM
#56
Oops!!!! I already posted this was a misquote ... have no idea why it's showing up again. JRP had been speaking to a set of TEA 5.3's unmilled. He got me straight and I posted this was a misquote on my part. JJRP reccommended AFR 205's be milled to 62CC with my setup ... Cometics gaskets I believe .035-.040" thickness.
Sorry to intrude, but, I had to set that straight. To get back on track, I'd like to see the results with the AFR 205's and a 224/228 or bigger Vinci cam.
Sorry to intrude, but, I had to set that straight. To get back on track, I'd like to see the results with the AFR 205's and a 224/228 or bigger Vinci cam.
04-05-2005, 07:08 AM
#57
7 Second Club
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: paducah, ky
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the only thing i can say is i am impressed with AFR! but i think its rediculous how every one wants THE PERFECT TEST. then when someone tries it every body picks and pokes at it 
until you decide the test is oblivious . if you dont wanna buy the heads you sure as hell dont have to. just sit back and relax. there will be many more examples and tests to come. some people you will never please.
as for me im patiently waiting for my money or a price drop
until you decide the test is oblivious . if you dont wanna buy the heads you sure as hell dont have to. just sit back and relax. there will be many more examples and tests to come. some people you will never please. as for me im patiently waiting for my money or a price drop
04-05-2005, 07:54 AM
#58
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would drag radials hurt 60' times? Compared to the run flats I thought this would be a huge improvement.
Interesting that the smaller cam actually looks better than the larger one. It would be interesting to see what a 228 or 230 cam would do.
I am amazed that these numbers are without an upgraded intake manifold or throttle body - although maybe not on second thought since the power isn't coming in the form of higher revs but with more torque...
Interesting that the smaller cam actually looks better than the larger one. It would be interesting to see what a 228 or 230 cam would do.
I am amazed that these numbers are without an upgraded intake manifold or throttle body - although maybe not on second thought since the power isn't coming in the form of higher revs but with more torque...
04-05-2005, 08:17 AM
#59
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome results!!!
What's with all the negativity?!
This post was made to show what can be done with heads alone. I think it is an EXCELLENT comparision with great results.
All the information was provided.
You complainers forget they didn't HAVE to do anything. They did this to share information to us as consumers.
Great job!
Chris
What's with all the negativity?!
This post was made to show what can be done with heads alone. I think it is an EXCELLENT comparision with great results.
All the information was provided.
You complainers forget they didn't HAVE to do anything. They did this to share information to us as consumers.
Great job!
Chris