what causes valve spring failure
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
In other words if you took the time to change the cam and spend the money, wouldn't you want to protect your investment and check on it once in a while so you don't spend MORE money if it blows up down the line? Sounds logical to me.
In other words if you took the time to change the cam and spend the money, wouldn't you want to protect your investment and check on it once in a while so you don't spend MORE money if it blows up down the line? Sounds logical to me.
The stock C5 'Vette has an LS1 with the same cam as an LS1 F-body, so if you just add the LS6 cam, you throw off the valvetrain geometry... plus the heavier LS1 valves will put more stress on the stock LS6 valve springs which were designed to be used with the lighter weight LS6 valves.
They could change that by putting a spring maintenance procedure in scheduled maintenance. And I wouldn't be surprised to see that in the LS7. As many here are aware, Ferrari specs a timing belt change requiring an engine removal every 15k miles.
I believe there are two failure modes here. One is high cycle fatigue. A crack propagates until the spring fails. That is what happens to NASCAR stock cars.
The second is creep, a long term plastic deformation that causes the lose of spring rate (the 30 million or cycles in 30k street miles is well past high cycle fatique limits). This is accelerated by high spring temperature, which is why extreme spring situations use spring oilers. ARE LS1 valve covers with oilers are relatively inexpensive ($475) and clear high ratio rockers. It is a way to extend spring life. I use them on my SBC.
That said, I would just change my springs annually and check my lifter preload/valve lash a little more frequently.
David
P.S.
For reference, the .842 lifter flat tappet cam in my late model is 248/256 with 1.8 and 1.6 rockers respectively. That is about .59 and .52 at the valve (CI Bowties actually lose flow over .6). Yet the the .020 numbers are only 276/284. I wanted to run 1.9s, however my engine builder put his foot down. Maybe next rebuild we will use hollow stem intakes and the 1.9s.







