Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

A lot of people switching from TR224 to F13

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2005, 01:19 PM
  #21  
11 Second Club
 
1ScrudeDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boring Green, Kentucky
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have Comp Cam, 224/581/112. Made 413 RWHP with no name Stage 2 heads and 4.10 rear. I trapped 119.31 mph last Friday.

The stick pulls (TQ) from midrange all the way to my rev limit of 6800. RWHP goes up to the limit as well. I have no desire to spend more time and money for perhaps a little gain. But since you have yet to open your baby up, tough choice.
Old 01-23-2005, 01:26 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JNorris
How can a cam like the F13 that has 6* more duration on the intake and 8* more duration on the exhaust with 7* degrees more overlap (the TR224 has 0 overlap) than a TR224 idle and drive better than the TR224?

Please explain this?


Thanks

John
It's because of the core used on the cam. FMS uses Cam Motion cores, which often make the cam feel much smaller than it is at idle and driving. My cam almost sounds stock through the catback, a lot of people think it's very small. People are even daily driving the Ron Jeremy from FMS (236/239 .600/.613 111LSA) with no problems, even in automatics.

Here is a vid of my car by the way if you're interested, please right click and save:
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vidcam.avi
Old 01-23-2005, 09:24 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
texasuperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just had a tr224 put in have'nt heard it yet since other mods are being put on as well, if youre not satisfied just put on bigger rocker arms
Old 01-23-2005, 09:34 PM
  #24  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
JNorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
It's because of the core used on the cam. FMS uses Cam Motion cores, which often make the cam feel much smaller than it is at idle and driving. My cam almost sounds stock through the catback, a lot of people think it's very small. People are even daily driving the Ron Jeremy from FMS (236/239 .600/.613 111LSA) with no problems, even in automatics.

Here is a vid of my car by the way if you're interested, please right click and save:
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vidcam.avi

Your car sounds good.
I do not doubt that the F11 or F13 idle well for a cam of their size.
I do doubt that either will idle as well as a cam that has 7* less overlap.


John
Old 01-24-2005, 12:17 AM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
35th SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hawaii track track.
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by freakynipples69
stock heads. I dont plan on aftermarket heads any time soon, if at all.

dont think you can hit 390-400hp just with a cam install.just my .02 cent.still havent dyno mine.but looking at my mph looks like its going to be close.good luck.
Old 01-24-2005, 12:55 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 35th SS
dont think you can hit 390-400hp just with a cam install.just my .02 cent.still havent dyno mine.but looking at my mph looks like its going to be close.good luck.
In an M6 with bolt ons and a proper tune, it shouldn't be that hard. you could always do an open loop Sd tone and go way over 400rwhp.
Old 01-24-2005, 01:25 AM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 35th SS
dont think you can hit 390-400hp just with a cam install.just my .02 cent.still havent dyno mine.but looking at my mph looks like its going to be close.good luck.
In an M6 with bolt ons and a proper tune, it shouldn't be that hard. you could always do an open loop SD tune and go way over 400rwhp.
Old 01-24-2005, 08:40 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
matts22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What is open loop SD tune like you mention? How does this compare to closed loop? How would you get "a lot" more power from this?
Old 01-24-2005, 09:20 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
92SilverSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bensalem, Pa, now montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

how long of intervals to replace springs on the 224 cam?? say compared to the GM ASA cam?
Old 01-24-2005, 10:54 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
freakynipples69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 35th SS
dont think you can hit 390-400hp just with a cam install.just my .02 cent.still havent dyno mine.but looking at my mph looks like its going to be close.good luck.

I have seen many people on the dyno section reaching 400rwhp in an M6 tuned with the TR224 and full boltons(which I also have). I am adding a cut out at the I-pipe which is good on the average an extra 10rwhp.
Old 01-24-2005, 11:04 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
zamboxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dont know man i got an m6 with intake exaust work done and a tr 224, and iam only making like 360 untuned, add like another 20 hp for the tune thats still only like 380 thats 10 or 20 hp short of target.
Old 01-24-2005, 11:14 AM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zamboxl
i dont know man i got an m6 with intake exaust work done and a tr 224, and iam only making like 360 untuned, add like another 20 hp for the tune thats still only like 380 thats 10 or 20 hp short of target.

Don't just add 20 for the tune, you can never guess at those numbers. Look at the thread in the dyno section titled something like "f13 dyno tune results", the guy did 36X without a tune, and is at 413 with a tune (439 uncorrected). You never know what the hell your comptuer is doing with a new cam, they all react differently. And don't underestimate the TR224, it is a really good cam and 400 is definitely possible. The F13 is just my preference.
Old 01-24-2005, 11:32 AM
  #33  
Teching In
 
JLSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So for a car that is used primarily as an autocrosser vs. a drag car, what should I go with? I'm thinking F13 as I'd like it to trap around 116 cam only but still have plenty down low for autocrossing. I don't think a 224 would be enough to trap 116 or more on stock heads with a full weight car. Don't want the car to be unpleasant at all to drive as it's not a race-only car. However it isn't a daily driver either. Thanks.
Old 01-24-2005, 11:48 AM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
freakynipples69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well if anyone wants to do a straight trade, my TR224 for your F13 then PM me otherwise it's TR224 for me.

edit: Also I figure I am making around 360rwhp right now with all the boltons. I was dynoed before I added on the S3 TB, ASP Pulley, and exhaust cut out and I made 340rwhp.
Old 01-24-2005, 11:50 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
zamboxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
Don't just add 20 for the tune, you can never guess at those numbers. Look at the thread in the dyno section titled something like "f13 dyno tune results", the guy did 36X without a tune, and is at 413 with a tune (439 uncorrected). You never know what the hell your comptuer is doing with a new cam, they all react differently. And don't underestimate the TR224, it is a really good cam and 400 is definitely possible. The F13 is just my preference.
damn then my comp is screwing me over i know iam running a little rich couse of the lt's and no tuning but tham i am getting raped by my comp then.
Old 01-24-2005, 12:47 PM
  #36  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
98TAauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JNorris
Your car sounds good.
I do not doubt that the F11 or F13 idle well for a cam of their size.
I do doubt that either will idle as well as a cam that has 7* less overlap.


John

dont worry, ill surely let you know how the F11 idles anyway LOL.. hopefully ill be happy and it wont be much worse than the 224 lol

hope to have mine together this weekend or soon anyway..
Old 01-24-2005, 01:42 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98TAauto
dont worry, ill surely let you know how the F11 idles anyway LOL.. hopefully ill be happy and it wont be much worse than the 224 lol

hope to have mine together this weekend or soon anyway..
I'm interested to hear what you have to say, having run both. Is the 224 tuned, and will you retune for the F11?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.