Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS1 to LS6 Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #1  
Fast331's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Question LS1 to LS6 Conversion

Any of you guys done this conversion. i have heard that all same equipment, just different setup. better rwhp? Any problems with this swap? just curious, might want to attempt if job is fairly easy, just wondering
thanks fast331
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:00 PM
  #2  
00ls1's Avatar
Possible Scammer - Buyer Beware - Issues Unresolved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Default

different block, heads, valvetrain, pcv, and intake. thats all
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #3  
01_SuperSlow's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

There are a lot better options out there than just an LS6 conversion. Do a search, there is a wealth of info here.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
BlueSix's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
From: its fucking cold
Default

If you're gonna take the time and money to do the LS6 conversion just go all out and do heads and cam. Won't cost a whole lot more and you'll see MUCH better gains.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:03 AM
  #5  
93TAWicked1's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 1
From: Portlan, OR
Default

Yep LS6's are peices of crap!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #6  
Robert56's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma, WA
Default

Originally Posted by 93TAWicked1
Yep LS6's are peices of crap!
I agree, they only run high 11's bone stock.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:59 AM
  #7  
fast01's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Farmingville, New York
Default

There are better options power wise, but I swapped in an LS6 long block from GM Performance Parts because water doesn't compress when it enters the lower front ram air on your LS1 because your favorite local covenience store fails to keep the drainage system in the parking lot clear and you end up in over a foot of water causing a piston to shatter into many pieces and twist a connecting rod into an "S" shape. Yeah, that was a run-on rant, but said local convenience store was found to be responsible for the damage so all the parts had to come from GM and appear to be stock (they paid for them). The engine was swapped and with nothing more than a tune (you'll need one) it's running in the mid to low 12's. Very easy and I'm very happy. Gas mileage wasn't affected either!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 01:07 AM
  #8  
Zach@Texas-Speed's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock
Default

do heads and cam....voila....you have even better than an LS6!!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 07:55 AM
  #9  
Bill's 02 Z-28 SS's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: silver Spring MD
Default

Hi Folks
if you want low risk approach, go with the LS6 (GM ported heads and Cam). I have not Dyno'ed my car as of this posting but I have been told I should see around 400+ RWHP. Yes there are better cams but it is a function on what you are looking for.
Bill
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #10  
GTO_Scott's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Default

I had planned on going the 2004 LS6 head and cam route (405hp setup) but decided to try AFR heads instead. I have a brand new set of heads in box and new cam in tube and would sell it below dealer cost if someone was interested. That would be about half the price of doing AFR and custom cam.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.