Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any disadvantage to "over-springing"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2005, 08:13 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99SS1857
The only real disadvantage in using springs more stout than you need is the horsepower robbing parisitic loss due to the cam having to push harder to open the valves. remember the only job a valve spring has to do is keep the lifter in contact with the cam lobe. The spring has to have enough pressure to slam the valve shut before the lobe comes back around again.

One must remember that for every spring the cam has to push open on the opening face of the lobe there is another spring that is pushing down on the closing side of the lobe essentially pushing it forward offsetting the power loss caused by the cam trying to open springs. In other words, more pressure does not cause power losses from trying to travel up a cam lobe and open springs. The only possible power loss will come from the increased friction of the roller on the cam's surface.
Old 02-24-2005, 08:17 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The crane's will be fine with this cam as they do not have much seat pressure compared to other duals. In fact it might even be wise to shim this spring to remove some of the installed height. A spring that is shimmed will go to higher rpm's before it becomes resonant. Ofcourse you could only shim the spring if you will be within the limits of coil bind, which you will be with small shims (.050" or so). This will probably not be necessary unless you are planning spinning to 7000 or so.
Old 02-24-2005, 08:26 AM
  #23  
Staging Lane
 
Flareside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
One must remember that for every spring the cam has to push open on the opening face of the lobe there is another spring that is pushing down on the closing side of the lobe essentially pushing it forward offsetting the power loss caused by the cam trying to open springs. In other words, more pressure does not cause power losses from trying to travel up a cam lobe and open springs. The only possible power loss will come from the increased friction of the roller on the cam's surface.
What about the rocker fulcrum, pushrod tip on the rocker, valve in the guide, inner/outer spring friction, etc.? When you increase spring pressure, friction increases everywhere in the valvetrain, not just at the lifter. Heat also increased. My LS1 is noticably harder to turn over with a wrench with stiffer springs in it.
Old 02-24-2005, 08:33 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

The trick is to spring right and not to over or underspring. Also lifters have to be able to handle the extra spring stiffness.
If I wanted extra insurance, I would just run 918's, just 1 step over 915's. I run 918's with .581 XE-R with no problem.
Old 02-24-2005, 08:40 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Flareside
What about the rocker fulcrum, pushrod tip on the rocker, valve in the guide, inner/outer spring friction, etc.? When you increase spring pressure, friction increases everywhere in the valvetrain, not just at the lifter. Heat also increased. My LS1 is noticably harder to turn over with a wrench with stiffer springs in it.

Good point, those frictions will increase as well. Heat will increase too but will it be noticeable, probably not until you get into 300 seat pounds for solid roller stuff. Also notice that when you turn over the motor by hand that it can be harder but once you pass the area which is harder to turn over the ratchet almost turns itself because the heavier springs push down on the closing side of the lobe just like they do on the opening side.
Old 02-24-2005, 08:52 AM
  #26  
Teching In
 
transam86ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is joey from D C Motorsports you can never over spring a engine more is better the spring you got is the best one for the job at hand we put those spring on all are cam instills and i have not had a problem yet
Old 02-24-2005, 08:56 AM
  #27  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
slow3hoe2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
One must remember that for every spring the cam has to push open on the opening face of the lobe there is another spring that is pushing down on the closing side of the lobe essentially pushing it forward offsetting the power loss caused by the cam trying to open springs. In other words, more pressure does not cause power losses from trying to travel up a cam lobe and open springs. The only possible power loss will come from the increased friction of the roller on the cam's surface.
this is true to a point. yes the lifters that are on their way down are helping the cam spin...but it is not a 50/50 offset. When the valve is closing, the lobe is being taken away from the lifter...rather than running into the lifter. As rpms increase, the lifter thats on its way down will be come less and less help. I have played with many different spring pressures in my solid roller sbf....and there is definitely power left on the table when you have more spring pressure than you need.
Old 02-24-2005, 09:31 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

what are the specs for REV duals? how do they match a Z06 cam on 1.8 rocker?
Old 02-24-2005, 10:04 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow3hoe2
this is true to a point. yes the lifters that are on their way down are helping the cam spin...but it is not a 50/50 offset. When the valve is closing, the lobe is being taken away from the lifter...rather than running into the lifter. As rpms increase, the lifter thats on its way down will be come less and less help. I have played with many different spring pressures in my solid roller sbf....and there is definitely power left on the table when you have more spring pressure than you need.
Another good point. Deffinately not a 50/50 offset at high rpms. But the added benefit of reduced valve bounce will more the offset any of these issues of higher losses, especially at higher rpms where valve bounce is very very likely to occur. Once again for the orignal intent of the orignal poster none of these theories will probably hold true to an extent of actually seeing a difference between a crane dual spring verses a comp 918 style spring.
Old 02-24-2005, 02:00 PM
  #30  
TECH Addict
 
marc_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central, MA
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't think there will be ANY problems overspringing a smaller stick.

The thought about collapsed lifters - the way I'm thinking about things, the milder stick will have a much less-likely chance of doing that even when running overkill springs. The milder lobes are not putting as much strain on the lifters as an extreme lobe would (which would actually require heavy springs).

Parasitic loss - For every valve that has to be opened, there is another that has to be shut. I don't see heavier springs as dragging down too much power. Remember this is a roller-valvetrain so it's not like you're "skidding" parts across each other. A skateboard won't roll with much more drag with a 150-pound kid on there vs a 100-pound kid.

For what it's worth, I have no idea - I ran 918's on my stock cam for a few days with no problems. I had no extra valvetrain noise what so ever. Everything was just like stock.
Old 02-24-2005, 02:04 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
 
marc_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central, MA
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow3hoe2
this is true to a point. yes the lifters that are on their way down are helping the cam spin...but it is not a 50/50 offset. When the valve is closing, the lobe is being taken away from the lifter...rather than running into the lifter. As rpms increase, the lifter thats on its way down will be come less and less help.
Very interesting...
Old 02-24-2005, 02:58 PM
  #32  
Naked AV
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Flareside
Next, I'll probably try a set of Comp 915 springs with titanium retainers. They're around 110 on the seat, perfect for my cam. The 918s are over 130, overkill for a mild cam IMO. I gotta get beehive springs back on this car, it looks like a dinosaur with those old design duals on it!
My guy at Comp told me to stay away from the 915's and do 918's for anything I would consider the 915's for.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.