Intake Manifold Flow Test

Steves words verbatim
The sheet metal manifold has really short runners. The actual runner centerline length is 3.75" down the centerline. This results in a plenum to valve back length of only 9.25". This would be too short a length to give adequate pulse tuning within the rpm range of a normally aspirated engine of this type. Work good at nine grand but that's outside the range of most engines. In any case, this manifold is going on a twin turbo engine. Should work fine under boost.
The Weiand manifold keeps up the the Fast up to .250" lift. Past that point the Fast takes off. I don't think this is due to the runner shape. I think this is a function of throttle bore size. Same holds true for the Stock LS6 manifold which has the smallest opening of those tested.
Sheet metal 91.5 mm throttle bore opening
Fast 90.2 mm
Weiand 78 mm
LS6 75.5 mm
If one were able to rework the LS6 manifold for a larger throttle bore, I'm sure the flow numbers would improve substantially. This manifold was bone stock. Both the Fast and Weiand were cleaned up internally and port matched.
The Edelbrock, as I mentioned above, is a dual plane manifold. This again was bone stock. The runners are smaller in cross section than on any of the other manifolds tested. Porting this manifold would help but it is difficult getting inside to rework a dual plane. I cut them open to rework then weld them back up. Too expensive to do unless it is for some sort of restricted racing class. I would like to flow test a GM or new Edelbrock single plane to see how those flow. In any case, the low side runner on the Edelbrock flowed quite well considering it's size.
Steve

i can post up each individual flow sheet if anybody wants them.
Last edited by jrp; Mar 22, 2005 at 11:49 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
i forgot who steve said he got the manifolds from. 








