Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best cam for my setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2005, 11:17 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
kcfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Best cam for power/steetability

Need a good cam with streetability and power. Will go with AFR 205 heads. 2002 Z28 A4 with Kooks LT and ORY and magnaflow catback, lid & K&N.

What cam do you recommend for my setup? Any HP estimates?
Old 03-17-2005, 12:50 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Blacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Streetability means different things to different people. Some good all around cams are the TR224, F4(226/226), on TSP225. All these cams will make 380-400rwhp with support mods like LT Headers and LS6 Intake with an M6.
Old 03-17-2005, 01:12 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I say go with the Futral Motorsports FM11. It looks large and makes the power of a large cam, but is VERY streetable. Heres 2 vids of my idle, my car really does drive like stock. Specs in sig.

http://www.lsuxblake.com/vidcam.avi
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vids%20001.avi

My car is doing 452/413 with just 5.3's. You can hit 460-470 with this cam and those AFR's.
Old 03-17-2005, 01:28 AM
  #4  
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBlurLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

how much power do you want? you can have a pretty small cam with those heads and make awesome power. its all a relative thing, some people dont think a t-rex is radical and some think a 224 lopes hard

i'd suggest figuring out exactly what you think is "streetable" and go from there.
Old 03-17-2005, 03:20 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
DaddySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

For more low end power AFR recommends the 220/224, for more power higher up - 224/228. Remember you need to match the cam to the heads..talk to AFR, they are very helpful.
Old 03-17-2005, 05:29 AM
  #6  
Teching In
 
C5 Purple Haze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davie Fla.
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DaddySS
For more low end power AFR recommends the 220/224, for more power higher up - 224/228. Remember you need to match the cam to the heads..talk to AFR, they are very helpful.
I agree, AFR has done a ton of R&D on those heads. I would definately get their advice on proper cam selection.
Old 03-17-2005, 12:38 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
General Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 536
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I like my X1, pretty decent numbers considering few bolt-ons. Slight surging and hot-start idle stumbling occassionally, but all in all very streetable. And strong.
Old 03-17-2005, 12:44 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Whatever you do, do NOT throw in a TR224, F4(226/226), on TSP225, or FM11, as was suggested. MATCH YOUR CAM TO YOUR HEADS. No point in spending big $$$ on those heads to just throw a shelf cam on 'em.

If you call up FMS, TR, or TSP, I bet you they THEY will not recommend just using the above cams!

Also, get the 90MM LSX...
Old 03-17-2005, 12:52 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black_knight

If you call up FMS, TR, or TSP, I bet you they THEY will not recommend just using the above cams!
Wanna bet? There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with running an off the shelf cam. In fact, most of the people putting down the best numbers on this board heads/cam are running off the shelf cams. As long as you don't run something incredibly too large or be way too conservative with it, it is fine.
Old 03-17-2005, 12:56 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
Wanna bet?
Well, I can't speak for them. But it would be foolish to do so.
Old 03-17-2005, 12:58 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
black_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You DID see that he's running AFR 205's, right? I'm sure they have "shelf" grinds for those heads which will work better with them than cams designed before the 205's existed...
Old 03-17-2005, 08:11 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jub jub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Comp XER compliments those heads nicely!
Old 03-17-2005, 09:56 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.vincihighperformance.com/...CT%20PAGE.HTML

the vhp 'boss' cam will be a great cam to use. graphs will be up shortly. comparing it against the comp cam.
Old 03-18-2005, 04:00 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
OWENMUSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: REDFORD,MI
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess i'm surprised this still shows up in threads. afr's are a different animal from stk/ported ls1/ls6 heads. why use a cam designed for heads other than what you have. taken 1 step over the edge. would you pick a cam grind for your lsx that was based on a hemi head? how about a small block ford?
Old 03-18-2005, 04:12 PM
  #15  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Yeah but he wants the best cam for both power AND streetability. That means compromises will have to be made.

kcfan, as was stated before, define what streetability means to you, then go from there. A 224 cam on 114 is pretty streetable to most people. My 235/240 on 112 cam is streetable to me, but definitely would not me to many people. Maybe what you like would be somewhere inbetween; only you can decide. You may have to just try something then switch it out if you don't like it.
Old 03-18-2005, 06:02 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My cam is totally streetable, after all, this is my only car. However, it wouldn't be for everybody. If you want it to drive like stock you can't get a big cam.
Old 03-18-2005, 07:32 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
 
ArcticFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Streetability was important to me too. I went with 205 AFR heads and a 222-222 .581 .581 xer 115lsa. Through stock mainfolds, y-pipe, and cats the car put down 376 rwhp and 361 rwtq. I figure with the longtubes you're getting I would have been over the 400 rwhp mark. (car has a 2800 vig, so some more drivetrain losses there as well compared to a m6)
Old 03-19-2005, 06:59 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Do you have a stock torque converter - I don't see it in your mods. If you do, and do not change it, you need a cam that idles well at 700 rpm or less and makes good power down low or your car will be a dog. That eliminates most of the cams discussed above.

I'd do the torque converter before the heads & cam.
Old 03-19-2005, 07:10 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
UtOhCop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pa
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm going with TR's 224 114LSA cam for my C5. Wanted something very tame that wouldn't effect driveability.
Old 03-19-2005, 02:02 PM
  #20  
Teching In
 
C5 Purple Haze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davie Fla.
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
Do you have a stock torque converter - I don't see it in your mods. If you do, and do not change it, you need a cam that idles well at 700 rpm or less and makes good power down low or your car will be a dog. That eliminates most of the cams discussed above.

I'd do the torque converter before the heads & cam.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.