Comp vs. FMS
04-05-2005, 08:48 PM
#44
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIKZ
your kidding right??? 
did you miss the next post i put up? dense ***. if i'm wrong, someone please point it out. i do know that thunder has their own lobes....and has them ground(i phrased it poorly before). i was under the impression that the T-Rex was included in that group. If thats not the case....then its not the case. And I'll learn something new. I'll be better off, but if it makes you feel better trying to belittle me for learning, go ahead and waste your time. No skin off my back hero.
-= EDIT =-
Check out this thread. This is what I was talking about.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....07&postcount=6
I'm not saying Thunder is better than Comp, or anything like that. I've not run either of their cams. But running a Comp Cam with the exact same specs as the Thunder cam will come close....just not the same. Thats what I am saying.
Last edited by cyphur_traq; 04-05-2005 at 09:17 PM.
04-05-2005, 09:43 PM
#45
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for that price i would pick a comp grind...
i went 11.8's @ 116 in an auto, full weight, with macs, 3.42's, lid, 3200 stall, and a 228/230 .571 .573 112lsa comp cam...with just the cam and converter i gained almost 5mph and 8 tenths of a second...
i went 11.8's @ 116 in an auto, full weight, with macs, 3.42's, lid, 3200 stall, and a 228/230 .571 .573 112lsa comp cam...with just the cam and converter i gained almost 5mph and 8 tenths of a second...
04-05-2005, 11:38 PM
#46
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know I'm a small fish in a big pond here but after dealing with Allan I would go with one of his cams. The man is ungodly sharp when it comes to the LS1 and cams. Also, his customer service is amazing. If you call him and ask about these two cams, he WILL tell you which one will make more power and which will run the number at the track. He has been there and done that. Call me an FMS pimp or whatever, but I like what the man does with these motors.
Can anyone contradict what I said here. If so, please post up.
Can anyone contradict what I said here. If so, please post up.
04-06-2005, 08:48 AM
#47
I will agree Allan is a good LS-1 guy but, you can't ask him which cam is better. That's like asking Thunder which cam is better..a thunder cam or a futral cam. What do you think they would say 
You have to ask someone that is unbiased.
You have to ask someone that is unbiased.
04-06-2005, 09:04 AM
#48
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Red Stick, LA
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Unaffiliated Racing
I will agree Allan is a good LS-1 guy but, you can't ask him which cam is better. That's like asking Thunder which cam is better..a thunder cam or a futral cam. What do you think they would say You have to ask someone that is unbiased.
You have to ask someone that is unbiased.
04-06-2005, 09:06 AM
#49
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Red Stick, LA
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
hmm....yea. did you miss the next post i put up? dense ***.
if i'm wrong, someone please point it out. i do know that thunder has their own lobes....and has them ground(i phrased it poorly before). i was under the impression that the T-Rex was included in that group. If thats not the case....then its not the case. And I'll learn something new. I'll be better off, but if it makes you feel better trying to belittle me for learning, go ahead and waste your time. No skin off my back hero.
-= EDIT =-
Check out this thread. This is what I was talking about.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....07&postcount=6
I'm not saying Thunder is better than Comp, or anything like that. I've not run either of their cams. But running a Comp Cam with the exact same specs as the Thunder cam will come close....just not the same. Thats what I am saying.
did you miss the next post i put up? dense ***. if i'm wrong, someone please point it out. i do know that thunder has their own lobes....and has them ground(i phrased it poorly before). i was under the impression that the T-Rex was included in that group. If thats not the case....then its not the case. And I'll learn something new. I'll be better off, but if it makes you feel better trying to belittle me for learning, go ahead and waste your time. No skin off my back hero.
-= EDIT =-
Check out this thread. This is what I was talking about.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....07&postcount=6
I'm not saying Thunder is better than Comp, or anything like that. I've not run either of their cams. But running a Comp Cam with the exact same specs as the Thunder cam will come close....just not the same. Thats what I am saying.
Good thread.
04-06-2005, 02:38 PM
#50
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
hmm....yea. did you miss the next post i put up? dense ***.
if i'm wrong, someone please point it out. i do know that thunder has their own lobes....and has them ground(i phrased it poorly before). i was under the impression that the T-Rex was included in that group. If thats not the case....then its not the case. And I'll learn something new. I'll be better off, but if it makes you feel better trying to belittle me for learning, go ahead and waste your time. No skin off my back hero.
-= EDIT =-
Check out this thread. This is what I was talking about.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....07&postcount=6
I'm not saying Thunder is better than Comp, or anything like that. I've not run either of their cams. But running a Comp Cam with the exact same specs as the Thunder cam will come close....just not the same. Thats what I am saying.
did you miss the next post i put up? dense ***. if i'm wrong, someone please point it out. i do know that thunder has their own lobes....and has them ground(i phrased it poorly before). i was under the impression that the T-Rex was included in that group. If thats not the case....then its not the case. And I'll learn something new. I'll be better off, but if it makes you feel better trying to belittle me for learning, go ahead and waste your time. No skin off my back hero.
-= EDIT =-
Check out this thread. This is what I was talking about.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....07&postcount=6
I'm not saying Thunder is better than Comp, or anything like that. I've not run either of their cams. But running a Comp Cam with the exact same specs as the Thunder cam will come close....just not the same. Thats what I am saying.
what my point is, thunder uses comp cams to grind their stuff.
04-06-2005, 05:00 PM
#51
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWIKZ
no one is trying to belittle you, i thought you were being sarcastic.not every cam will ever be the same as another with the same specs...they will come very close but not quite the same.
what my point is, thunder uses comp cams to grind their stuff.
what my point is, thunder uses comp cams to grind their stuff.
thunder doesn't physically grind their own cams, so comp may very well do it(likliehood is high). my only point was that thunder doesn't use comp's off the shelf lobes, they use their own.
04-06-2005, 10:06 PM
#55
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SteelBallz
I am going to make up my mind by Friday.... I promise!!
04-07-2005, 05:58 PM
#56
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have said that I will be putting it in after finals (May 10th ish). BUT if I actually get the cam in my possesion, who know when I will do it (probably sooner).
Let me know if you are going to come to MMP or not...
Let me know if you are going to come to MMP or not...
