Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pistons: Reverse Dome vs Flattop with dish

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2003, 04:14 PM
  #1  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,698
Received 1,143 Likes on 743 Posts

Default Pistons: Reverse Dome vs Flattop with dish

Can anyone explain some of the finer differences?

Also, how much dish is considered a lot for a FI piston, anything over -10cc?
Old 01-11-2003, 04:23 PM
  #2  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default Re: Pistons: Reverse Dome vs Flattop with dish

I posted a question a couple of months ago on how much dish could you use to lower the compression ratio. If I remember correctly Diamond said that you can generally the dish volume has to be less than 24cc. I would think that 8-12cc(valve relief size) would be very minimal and 20-24(soup bowl size) would be excessive.
Phillip
Old 01-11-2003, 04:48 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Pistons: Reverse Dome vs Flattop with dish

John,

From one standpoint I think it's just semantics. A Reverse dome is used to mirror the combustion chamber to get the best burn possible for a compression ratio. Usually a reverse dome is there for low compression race engines, like a 9:1 NASCAR engine or a blown engine.

I would rather have a large dish in the piston and a small chamber to get the compression ratio I wanted rather than a big chamber. It does add weight to the piston, and makes you run a shorter rod sometimes, but it works better for burn.

That's my thoughts.

Bret



Quick Reply: Pistons: Reverse Dome vs Flattop with dish



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.