Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

calling all those mod gurus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #1  
mph476's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Valley Village, CA
Default calling all those mod gurus

what would be a fair guestimate for what a dynojet would show for the following setup:

2002 camaro m6 3.42s

kooks LT w/ cats

Gmmg exhaust

slp lid

ls6 cam

ported ls6 heads

dyno tune
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 12:34 AM
  #2  
Bo White's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
From: Vance, Alabama
Default

365 rwhp
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:38 AM
  #3  
DeepBlueZ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Bo White
365 rwhp

you don't think that's a tad low???

i know it's a relatively tiny cam, but the heads have got to help out a little (even though they're too much head for that application really).

my logic here is that plenty of stock Z06s have done 365 to the wheels. he's basically building a factory LS6 motor (heads, cam, got the intake already) plus ported heads, full exhaust and a tune.

i dont see why 375-390 is out of the question...

Last edited by DeepBlueZ; May 6, 2005 at 01:54 AM.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 02:10 AM
  #4  
AsianIce25's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Royal Oak, MI
Default

i have your setup plus and i only put down 351.5 on a mustang dyno, and thats prob around 390ish maybe 400 on a dynojet. if you can do this and get 390, id say youre doing good. my advice, get a big cam, bigger than what i have. id say maybe a tsp 231 237 or a lot of people have recommended the 233/239. in any case, if you go with the stock zo6 cam, youll prob want more. at least go with a 224 cam like i have on a tighter lsa, like a 112 like i have. the smaller the lsa themore power youll make on motor, and nitrous will like the overlap. if you ever plan on going blower/turbo, get a cam on a 114 lsa.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #5  
blkZ28spt's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 1
From: The South
Default

I agree. You need more cam. You can get a more powerfull cam that still drives/sounds virtually like stock too, if that's what you want.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 12:29 PM
  #6  
777's Avatar
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

however the 231/237 sounds nowhere near stock...and if you are going for power i wouldn't advise that cam...it wasn't really designed for max power...it was more for good power and great valvespring wear...the lobes on that cam are not very agressive...it is what i have ...it lopes real hard, but i would've chosen a different cam if i had to do it over...definatly a futral cam
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.