Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thunder Racing CheaTR cam only results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2005, 03:50 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
i told yall he couldnt leave that thing alone for more than a few months, thats just jason for you
hell I dont even know the guy but I know that car has had a lot of different set ups, lol.
Old 06-25-2005, 03:57 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Scoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well i should have mine in any day now...damn, i need more time off.
Old 06-25-2005, 08:01 AM
  #23  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like a Jay Allan camshaft.
Old 06-25-2005, 09:36 AM
  #24  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SilverSurfer
I'm really impressed with this cam, but I do have some questions.

You say the cam is indistinguishable from stock. I had a TR 224 in my car before and I know they use pretty aggresive profiles. When you pop open the hood and listen to the motor does it sound stock or like a sewing machine? I like the power gains but I don't want any valvetrain noise from a stealth cam. LS6 cam is indistinguishable.

What are Jason's bolt-ons/mods? 329 rwhp from a 2000 LS1 is pretty high.

Thanks
Due to the very fast ramps, there is a small increase in valvetrain noise over stock, but running stock manifolds masks most of the clatter. Headers seem to amplify it. If you want absolutely bone stock sound coming from underhood, you'll have to go with a less powerful cam, plain and simple.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 07-03-2005, 02:37 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
TT_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there is actually quite a bit of valvetrain noise. Espeically above 2k.

Dave
Old 07-03-2005, 02:40 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

that usually means your preload is too low
Old 07-03-2005, 02:47 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
TT_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what do you mean??

Dave
Old 07-03-2005, 03:28 AM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Your lifter preload is too low. Margins are .030>.060 with stock and Comp 850-16
The closest you are to .060 the less noise.

This is quote from one of my previous posts
Every aftermarket has their own little tricks, for non adjustables (stock or not) it is straight forward. Tighten bolt gently untill you cannot twist the p-rod by hand (no need for it to be forceful). Once you reach that stage it is 22ftlbs with an accurate trq wrench.
Personaly I like to bring both valves at same height "compression height" (not necessary, but that is me)
After that you need to check preload on lifter just to make sure you have the correct p-rod length.

Preload measurement:

I normaly prime the motor at this time with coil pacs and pump still disengaged and fuel line disconected (use container for any remneants in fuel line), butwith covers on (not to make a mess).

Once I have done 2>3 cranks with a few full revolutions and i see oil pressure for a few seconds, then I remove covers:

Hand rotate the engine in its normal direction of rotation until both valves are closed. You are on the compression cycle for that cylinder. (At this position the valve springs are at their least amount of tension making the job a little easier to do.)

Wait a few minutes, allowing the lifters to bleed down. Now, lay a rigid straight edge across the cylinder head, supporting it on the surface of the head where the valve cover gasket would go. Using a metal scribe and the straightedge, carefully scribe a line on both pushrods. Now slowly remove the torque from all valve train bolts, removing any pressure from the pushrods. Wait a few minutes for the pushrod seat in the hydraulic lifter to move back to the neutral position. Carefully scribe a new line on both pushrods.

Measure the distance between the two scribe marks, it represents the amount of lifter preload. If the lines are .030” to .060” apart you have proper lifter preload. If the lines are the same or less than .020” apart you have no or insufficient preload.

Hope this makes sense.
Old 07-03-2005, 08:16 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Scoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well, my CheaTR cam is going in today. Today is the day. I wont have dyno results for a bit, but ill let you know how she pulls!!!
Old 07-03-2005, 09:56 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHRISPY
Very nice!!! Any valvespring longevity concerns with that super fast intake lobe? Would yearly spring changes be required in your opinion?

How much power would be lost with say an XE lobe on the intake?
thats alot of lift for such a small cam.
Old 07-03-2005, 09:57 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
 
4mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SilverSurfer
I'm really impressed with this cam, but I do have some questions.

You say the cam is indistinguishable from stock. I had a TR 224 in my car before and I know they use pretty aggresive profiles. When you pop open the hood and listen to the motor does it sound stock or like a sewing machine? I like the power gains but I don't want any valvetrain noise from a stealth cam. LS6 cam is indistinguishable.

What are Jason's bolt-ons/mods? 329 rwhp from a 2000 LS1 is pretty high.

Thanks
i wouldnt call the tr224 aggresive.
the comp is more aggresive that the tr
Old 07-03-2005, 12:27 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
TT_Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

boy thats a lot of work to check lifter preload. what i did this time and in the past was basically set the rockers to 22 ft/lbs regardless of the position of lifters on the cam. i've never had problems this way in the past and being that its a c5, i have no way to turn the motor over by hand up front.

Dave
Old 07-03-2005, 02:59 PM
  #33  
Teching In
 
Zadens01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am definately interested in this cam. It looks to be very promising for one
who doesn't want the lope. I'm anxiously awaiting results with lt's.

Would this be a good cam for a procharged setup or should I just stick to the
tried and true gt2-3? I don't mind changing valve springs when needed, thats
not an issue.
Old 07-03-2005, 05:01 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
greatskiiiier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4mula
i wouldnt call the tr224 aggresive.
the comp is more aggresive that the tr

BS, the XE-R has a ramp rate of 49, the TR224 has one of 27 i think, cant recall exactly but its was definitly under 30
Old 07-03-2005, 05:13 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

TR lobes are between XE and XE-R
Old 07-03-2005, 05:31 PM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
greatskiiiier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

maybe, but the XE-R lobes are 49, and the TR224 is 27 i think, but definitly under 30
Old 07-04-2005, 12:25 AM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

49 is the rate variance between .050 and .006 lifts of XE-R.
The TR are something like 50 or 51.
XE being 53
If anyone has .006 lifts for a TR cam we would know for sure.
This has been hashed a long time ago.
TR has a proprietary lobe and was put on market before XE-R.
Old 07-04-2005, 12:36 AM
  #38  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FWIW, I just installed a CheaTR for a customer this morning, and it is not so much like stock you wouldnt know. It is a nice sound, and felt strong on the road, without tuning. Will be interesting to see how it does on Nitrous.
Old 07-04-2005, 02:47 AM
  #39  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Drew778's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAT3
FWIW, I just installed a CheaTR for a customer this morning, and it is not so much like stock you wouldnt know. It is a nice sound, and felt strong on the road, without tuning. Will be interesting to see how it does on Nitrous.
Sorry eh CAT3 cam install masterbater

FYI, the CheaTR have a nice lope to it
Old 07-04-2005, 03:15 AM
  #40  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didnt notice any valvetrain noise other then stock sounds, unlike mine however which I swear is a garage of 90 y/o seamstresses under the hood. When BlueSS and I finished and started the car, it did have an ever so slight, beautiful lope, noticeable probably because all the hype of "sounds just like stock" *raising the bullshit flag*.


Quick Reply: Thunder Racing CheaTR cam only results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.