402ci, 408ci, and rocking pistons
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am curious. With all of these 408ci and 402ci motors out there like the Scoggin Dickie, and others, how is everyone dealing with the piston at the bottom of the sleeve on the 4.00" stroke.
On a C5-R block, this is not a problem because the sleeve is 6.00" long and the block is built for the 4 inch stroke to accomidate for this.
On a 6.0 Iron block, if you go 4" stroke, the sleeve is only 5.5" long. When the piston comes down at BDC, the piston is extremely close to the bottom of the sleeve and rocking will occur. So a off the shelf piston will not work reliably.
On the LS2 block, the sleeve is 5 5/8" long. When I ordered my new pistons, the company that made them was extremely concerned, about the 4 inch stroke in the iron block, at their recommendation they wanted me to move to the LS2 block had me move to custom made pistson to insure that the piston would stay as far in the sleeve as possible on BDC and prevent piston rocking at the bottom of the sleeve. The more the piston comes out of the sleeve, the more force will be placed on the sleeve when it is pushed back in.
I am curious if anyone else has addressed this.
On a C5-R block, this is not a problem because the sleeve is 6.00" long and the block is built for the 4 inch stroke to accomidate for this.
On a 6.0 Iron block, if you go 4" stroke, the sleeve is only 5.5" long. When the piston comes down at BDC, the piston is extremely close to the bottom of the sleeve and rocking will occur. So a off the shelf piston will not work reliably.
On the LS2 block, the sleeve is 5 5/8" long. When I ordered my new pistons, the company that made them was extremely concerned, about the 4 inch stroke in the iron block, at their recommendation they wanted me to move to the LS2 block had me move to custom made pistson to insure that the piston would stay as far in the sleeve as possible on BDC and prevent piston rocking at the bottom of the sleeve. The more the piston comes out of the sleeve, the more force will be placed on the sleeve when it is pushed back in.
I am curious if anyone else has addressed this.
#4
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What you are refencing is a situation that needs to be addressed, but it is more of an issue with 4.125 and 4.250 stroke LS1's (obviously less "popular"). The key with ANY stroker regarding piston rock at the bottom of the bore is precise piston to wall clearance, and the shape the piston manufacturer designs into the "barrel" shape of the piston skirt. With longer stroke engines, a better designed piston (perhaps not a shelf piece) can make more power due to less rock and better stability (subsequently better ring seal) with a well designed piston.
I wouldn't worry too much about it with a name brand piston and a 4" stroke....you should be fine.
Tony M.
I wouldn't worry too much about it with a name brand piston and a 4" stroke....you should be fine.
Tony M.
#5
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
I wouldn't worry too much about it with a name brand piston and a 4" stroke....you should be fine.