Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

stroke vs bore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2005, 05:29 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
CONVERTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default stroke vs bore

ok i might be fully wrong about all this but help me out.. This might be really noobish so please keep the flaming down and teach me....


Currently I have an LT1 inside of my converted 95 T/a (the one in my sig)

anyhoo to compete my conversion I'd like to swap in an LSx. I have a bare short block (LS6) and i'm looking for a rolling assem. right now. I'm thinking about using Mahle parts... What side bore is my LS6?

Also they have a 454 stroker kits and others

what are the pro's and con's of stroking? What is more effiective just boring or stroking? which is more fuel effiecent and which will produce more power?
Old 09-01-2005, 06:07 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cubes are cubes. The power will come from displacement. Fuel economy
will suffer accordingly.

You would benefit more from boring however. That will allow for more flexibility
in head/chamber work.

IE: Unshrouding valves will improve flow

Going too long on the stroke is said to limit upper RPM potential, but I haven't
really heard of street engines suffering from stroking.
Old 09-01-2005, 09:42 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Problem with the LS1 is the only way you are going to get more bore is another block or sleaving what you have. Stroke is the only real way to change cubes in a LS1/6 block cheaply.

BTW the stock bore is 3.898" or 99mm

Bret
Old 09-01-2005, 09:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
bichin95redta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, N.Y.
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A recent tech article in Popular Hot Rodding tested the HP (bore) vs TQ (stroke) debate. The testing was very comprehensive, and every effort was made to minimize variables. I was shocked at the results, as I had always bought into the idea that strokers make superior TQ. The tests proved otherwise. The long and the short of it; TQ is a function of displacement.
Old 09-01-2005, 09:59 PM
  #5  
LC
TECH Resident
 
LC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 8000DA Land
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what's the max CID on a stock bore LS1?

ia 4.100 crank possible?
Old 09-01-2005, 10:21 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
bichin95redta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, N.Y.
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The largest PRACTICAL LS1 displacement increases I've read about involve carefully grinding the bottom of the cylinder liners to allow the installation of a 4.250 crank in an LS1 block. This will yield 406 ci. I've also read about machined-out and re-sleeved (4.125 bore) LS1 blocks using a 4.000 stroke, which will produce a 427 ci LS1-based engine. There may be ways to get even more displacement from an LS1 block, but I haven't read about them.
Old 09-01-2005, 10:44 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Obviously if you aren't limited to an engine size you'd want the biggest bore and the biggest stroke possible, but that isn't always the case.

The big bore/short stroke is prefered in race engines because the engine builders want to get everything out of the induction system possible, so they run the biggest bore allowed by the block. Then they put the maximum amount of stroke they can to make sure they are at the max CID they are allowed to run.

Then of course it's who has the best induction system and who can keep the engine together at some of the big RPM levels a race engine sees. And of course there is so much more than that, but those are the very basics.

In a street engine you don't really want to turn a bunch of RPM because the stress put on the engine due to RPM increases exponentially.
Old 09-01-2005, 10:50 PM
  #8  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bichin95redta
The largest PRACTICAL LS1 displacement increases I've read about involve carefully grinding the bottom of the cylinder liners to allow the installation of a 4.250 crank in an LS1 block. This will yield 406 ci. I've also read about machined-out and re-sleeved (4.125 bore) LS1 blocks using a 4.000 stroke, which will produce a 427 ci LS1-based engine. There may be ways to get even more displacement from an LS1 block, but I haven't read about them.
the darton sleeves will go to 4.160 and the 4.200 sleeves are going to be released in the future.

largest off the shelf crank i know of is 4.125 stroke which is 395ci with the stock bore. there's really not enough deck height in the ls1 to run really long stroke. MTI used a darton sleeved bored out to 4.160 and a custom 4.185 stroke for there 455ci packages.
Old 09-01-2005, 11:11 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The real question here is, speed costs money how fast you wanna go?

Bret
Old 09-01-2005, 11:15 PM
  #10  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
The real question here is, speed costs money how fast you wanna go?

Bret
aint that the truth. as is your David Reher quote.
Old 09-02-2005, 11:40 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Adding bore to an LS6 block will require big $$ and increase risk of failure. If 388" or 395" isn't enough, I'd sell the block and start with a 6.0 block and go to 408" A good 388 package will give you a fat torque curve with a minimum of 450 ft-lbs over a nice range and peak HP in the high 400s, if not 500 RWHP. Throw on a 100 shot for when you need a little extra kick.

I think Fastech built a 395 that reved to almost 7k and put down 500 RWHP
Old 09-02-2005, 06:16 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
 
bichin95redta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, N.Y.
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"largest off the shelf crank i know of is 4.125 stroke which is 395ci with the stock bore"

Custom billet steel cranks are available in strokes up to 4.250". One supplier of this size stroker crank is LA Enterprises. So, yes, as far as off-the-shelf cranks go, you are right; 4.125 strokers (Lunati, Scat, etc.) are the largest.

Also, billet cranks are a good bit more pricey than a forged crank.
Old 09-10-2005, 04:09 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
CONVERTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how much are sleeves and what would one expect to pay to have it done?>




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.