Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PATRIOT CAMS? GETTING SOME BEAT NUMBERS>>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2005, 10:57 AM
  #21  
Flossin' twin turbos
iTrader: (55)
 
Moparnos (The SLP Guy)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn my car stock with midlengths, free mods,slp ram air made 341hp, don't remeber the torque but it wasn't that high. i think it was 352 not sure i'll have to check on that.
Old 09-11-2005, 11:05 AM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hardtopSS
peak tq was at roughly 3200 , horse power flattened out at around 6200 rpms. there should be no restriction other than a lack of ls6 intake, i have full exhaust and no cats. i will find away to post up these graphs, but i still think that im missing some power here. a intake and a underdrive pulley are not going to add 40 hp. i hope its just that this patriot cam is a piece of ****, and that my engine isnt blowing by 40 hp.
You could realistically see 20 rwhp from the intake and pulley. But here's the thing. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH YOUR NUMBERS. You have an A4, they don't dyno high, you have a high stall, they also "eat up" horsepower. You've got the stall and power to cut low 1.6 60' times at the track. stop worrying about your dyno numbers and put some money into suspension to make the car hook, you'll run well into the 11's with your combo....nothing wrong with that.
Old 09-11-2005, 11:11 AM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
 
firechicken2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSix
you'll run well into the 11's with your combo....nothing wrong with that.
heh
thatd be nice.. cut a 11 sec timeslip, someone'll ask what you got and will get a reply "not much, just measley 320 rwhp.. "

thatd rule
Old 09-11-2005, 09:40 PM
  #24  
Launching!
 
krexken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: longview, tx
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

113mph doesn't sound too shabby to me. I'd like to hear what some 380hp cars trap at. Your dyno numbers still sound a little funky to me. Peak torque at 3200rpm? Man, that sounds awful low to have a hp peak at 6200. Of course, that is a pretty desirable spread.
Old 09-11-2005, 11:11 PM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by krexken
Peak torque at 3200rpm?
It's because of the unlocked converter.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.