Torquer II, PRC 2.5's Results
09-09-2005, 09:10 AM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Torquer II, PRC 2.5's Results i know lots of people have been wondering so here you go
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/377774-torquer-ii-prc-stage-2-5-results.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/377774-torquer-ii-prc-stage-2-5-results.html
09-09-2005, 10:14 AM
#3
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
83K on the block - i did a compression test before H/C and everything was fine so i didn't do a leak down test - no oil consumption issues whatsoever either
09-09-2005, 10:54 AM
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems a little low to me, I'm shooting for 440+rwhp with my PRC's, granted they have 2.055/1.60 valves, and I have roughly 410rwhp now, but I would think you should net more than that. Aren't there people hitting near 400rwhp with that cam alone?
09-09-2005, 11:28 AM
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Orange Peel
Seems a little low to me, I'm shooting for 440+rwhp with my PRC's, granted they have 2.055/1.60 valves, and I have roughly 410rwhp now, but I would think you should net more than that. Aren't there people hitting near 400rwhp with that cam alone?
09-09-2005, 11:40 AM
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by iamsickofitall
yeah i've seen numbers like this with this cam only - but then again, i never dynoed the car stock or at any stage in between so i don't know what i started at - it could have been 270 rwhp from the factory
09-09-2005, 12:02 PM
#7
We don't have any before the h/c dyno sheet? 
Thats always the best way to tell performance gains.
Thats always the best way to tell performance gains.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Trending Topics
09-09-2005, 02:48 PM
#8
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i misplaced my flow sheet...again...but they flow a little better than advertised numbers all the way across the board if i remember correctly
my stock clutch is now starting to take a crap on me...whenever i get on it, the pedal tends to stick to the floor - it still catches if i stomp on it but it takes a light kick or two to get it to come back up...don't know if the exact cause of this was present at the time of my tuning/dyno but it might be a reason for the lower than avg. numbers - i'm searching on this now
under normal acceleration, it acts completely normal
my stock clutch is now starting to take a crap on me...whenever i get on it, the pedal tends to stick to the floor - it still catches if i stomp on it but it takes a light kick or two to get it to come back up...don't know if the exact cause of this was present at the time of my tuning/dyno but it might be a reason for the lower than avg. numbers - i'm searching on this now
under normal acceleration, it acts completely normal