Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Who has the F11 on a Stock Headed Car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2005, 01:52 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
FstBlkz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Who has the F11 on a Stock Headed Car?

Right now I'm pretty set on the F13 112+4 ... taking everybodies word for it that the driveability is near-stock. But I was wanting to get an idea of how much power would be lost by taking it down 1 step to the F11 (228/230) for the pontential BETTER driveability.

I know the F13 is THE cam, but I'm just wanting some comments from ppl w/ real life experience w/ the F11 on a stock headed car.


TIA
Old 10-17-2005, 04:01 PM
  #2  
Var
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Var's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm also considering the F11 for a stock headed (LS6) car. Why'd you choose the F13 over it?
Old 10-17-2005, 04:07 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Allan himself said there would be no more than 6-8 rwhp difference between the F11 and F13. I have the F11 and love it, but I'd definitely recommend the F13. The driveability will be no different between the 2 cams, they both drive excellent.
Old 10-17-2005, 06:33 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
FstBlkz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
Allan himself said there would be no more than 6-8 rwhp difference between the F11 and F13. I have the F11 and love it, but I'd definitely recommend the F13. The driveability will be no different between the 2 cams, they both drive excellent.
I have no doubt that the driveability of allans cams are not top notch. Its just that if the F13(230/232) has great driveability ... then shouldn't the F11(228/230) have even better driveability? And if there was only a 6-8rwhp difference b/w the F11 and F13, I could live w/ that.
Old 10-17-2005, 06:44 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
LSUxBlake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FstBlkz28
I have no doubt that the driveability of allans cams are not top notch. Its just that if the F13(230/232) has great driveability ... then shouldn't the F11(228/230) have even better driveability? And if there was only a 6-8rwhp difference b/w the F11 and F13, I could live w/ that.
I guess you could say yes, but I'd just think you'd want the F13, being that the F11 does drive like stock and I'd take every little bit I could get since driveability will likely be the same with the F13.
Old 10-17-2005, 07:18 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
FstBlkz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The other thing that'd be interesting to see on a stock headed car is what the power under the curve, and the low/mid range hp/tq looked like on the F11 compared to the F13.
My car will probably see the strip once or twice a year ... so I'm not up in the rev's that much other than just goosin it around town (to about 5k).

I'll probably still wind up going w/ the F13, I'm just looking into all possible options until I actually buy the cam. That way I'm 110% sure thats the cam I want when I've got it in my hands all lubed up, and i'm sliding it in




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.