Cam for 400 rwtq on stock heads?
#21
Originally Posted by markp03
you will need a big cam like a t-rex or a g5x3 or something of the like
#26
My tr230/224 .576/.563 111lsa hit 395/377 on stock heads. WITHOUT a pulley.
All my mods at the time:
Modifications-
__Valvetrain__
-TR 230 (230/224 .575/.563 111)
-Hardened Pushrods
-Comp 918 Valve Springs
-Comp Titanium Retainers
-LS2 Timing Chain
__External Engine__
-TSP Air Lid
-Free Ram Air
-FRAM Air filter
-SLP Smooth Bellow
-Shaner S2 Throttle Body
-Jet Hot LT Ceramic Coated Headers
-Lane's Duals (3" Off road X pipe, 12" Flowpro Twisters)
-Dyno Tuning via HP Tuners (Sean Freese @ Fastech)
All my mods at the time:
Modifications-
__Valvetrain__
-TR 230 (230/224 .575/.563 111)
-Hardened Pushrods
-Comp 918 Valve Springs
-Comp Titanium Retainers
-LS2 Timing Chain
__External Engine__
-TSP Air Lid
-Free Ram Air
-FRAM Air filter
-SLP Smooth Bellow
-Shaner S2 Throttle Body
-Jet Hot LT Ceramic Coated Headers
-Lane's Duals (3" Off road X pipe, 12" Flowpro Twisters)
-Dyno Tuning via HP Tuners (Sean Freese @ Fastech)
#27
Originally Posted by FstBlkz28
My tr230/224 .576/.563 111lsa hit 395/377 on stock heads. WITHOUT a pulley.
Originally Posted by markp03
you will need a big cam like a t-rex or a g5x3 or something of the like
#30
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
I'm contemplating the same but on faster lobes
Like:
224/224, .588/.588 110lsa +0 (or a 112 lsa +0)
Like:
224/224, .588/.588 110lsa +0 (or a 112 lsa +0)
#32
Guys If I can ever get a chance to post my graph. You will like the Torque numbers!!!!!! I dont even have longtubes just mac mids. 222/222 xer 581 114+2
Let me see what I can do. John
Let me see what I can do. John
#33
Originally Posted by 99FormulaM6
Nick, if i sell my car ill get with you when i pick up a new one, since you know more about this than I do, and I like the looks of the graph that was posted.
OK, sounds good Cris.
#34
Originally Posted by Ojustracing
Guys If I can ever get a chance to post my graph. You will like the Torque numbers!!!!!! I dont even have longtubes just mac mids. 222/222 xer 581 114+2
Let me see what I can do. John
Let me see what I can do. John
I'd like to see this myself. With the xe-r lobes your duration at .200 .300 .400 up to peak is probably greater then mine so it kind of makes sense. What doesn't though is that your cam has almost no overlap. Either or go ahead and dig that graph up.
#35
If you don't mind the funny car lope, then a 228/224 109 on a 108 ICL will make big torque. It has the same IVC and EVO as the 224/224 110 110 cam you were thinking of, but more overlap.
#36
Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
If you don't mind the funny car lope, then a 228/224 109 on a 108 ICL will make big torque. It has the same IVC and EVO as the 224/224 110 110 cam you were thinking of, but more overlap.
Edit, nevermind, I just saw that you were speaking of a my cam straight up (110icl). My cam was on a 106icl which is part of the reason it made the torque it did. Sorry, I need to read more carefully sometimes, ha ha.
#37
DAP:
Yup, I was referring to the 110 ICL. Your peak TQ was in the 4500 - 4800 rpm range which is where these cars seem to peak with a wide variety of cams, including those with a 44* IVC. I assume that LS6 intake has a fair amount influence on that. My guess is that a 110 ICL would still peak by 4800 and not give up much peak TQ, if any, and make a little better power up top. It would probably give up a bit on the bottom end though.
Yup, I was referring to the 110 ICL. Your peak TQ was in the 4500 - 4800 rpm range which is where these cars seem to peak with a wide variety of cams, including those with a 44* IVC. I assume that LS6 intake has a fair amount influence on that. My guess is that a 110 ICL would still peak by 4800 and not give up much peak TQ, if any, and make a little better power up top. It would probably give up a bit on the bottom end though.
#39
Apparently most ppl dont know what stock heads means. lol
You'd need a huge cam with every f-in bolt on available (fast etc.) and you still might not see it since the numbers attained would be relative to how strong/weak your car was stock.
You'd need a huge cam with every f-in bolt on available (fast etc.) and you still might not see it since the numbers attained would be relative to how strong/weak your car was stock.
#40
Originally Posted by skippytheloon
Apparently most ppl dont know what stock heads means. lol
You'd need a huge cam with every f-in bolt on available (fast etc.) and you still might not see it since the numbers attained would be relative to how strong/weak your car was stock.
You'd need a huge cam with every f-in bolt on available (fast etc.) and you still might not see it since the numbers attained would be relative to how strong/weak your car was stock.
What you need is a well balanced combo.