Cam for 400 rwtq on stock heads?
11-02-2005, 12:11 PM
#42
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
DAP:
Yup, I was referring to the 110 ICL. Your peak TQ was in the 4500 - 4800 rpm range which is where these cars seem to peak with a wide variety of cams, including those with a 44* IVC. I assume that LS6 intake has a fair amount influence on that. My guess is that a 110 ICL would still peak by 4800 and not give up much peak TQ, if any, and make a little better power up top. It would probably give up a bit on the bottom end though.
Yup, I was referring to the 110 ICL. Your peak TQ was in the 4500 - 4800 rpm range which is where these cars seem to peak with a wide variety of cams, including those with a 44* IVC. I assume that LS6 intake has a fair amount influence on that. My guess is that a 110 ICL would still peak by 4800 and not give up much peak TQ, if any, and make a little better power up top. It would probably give up a bit on the bottom end though.
11-04-2005, 09:44 AM
#44
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: HARRISON TWP MI
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DAP, sorry to thread jack but was reading the post and am looking for a cam for my truck. I have an 06 SS silverado with a 6.0 345/380. I was looking along the lines of the 224/224 and several companys make this cam with different lifts and lsa. My question is what lobes are better or what cam would i benefit from more. The motor is stock except for bolt ons & exhaust. Its a daily driver but want more power and torque. I also like the lope as long as its still driveable. You seem knowledgeable about these cam so thats why im asking. thanks for the help in advance.
