Trickflow vs AFR on 3.90 bore flow numbers
11-02-2005, 10:48 PM
#22
10 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
There's more to heads than flow. I am concerned that relocating the spark plug might have adversely affected the extraordinary Gen III combustion chamber.
Last edited by Gary Z; 11-02-2005 at 10:54 PM.
11-03-2005, 07:12 PM
#29
Originally Posted by MeentSS02
Intriguing...have they released a price on these yet? What do you use for rocker arms?
Originally Posted by MeentSS02
Looks like you caught that too...I'm definitely liking the idea of having something optimized for the 3.900 bore considering I just don't have the money (nor do I want to spend the money) for a larger bore engine.
Originally Posted by Raife
when can we order a set?
Originally Posted by distortion_69
Agreed.. and at what price?
Josh
Josh
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
hmmm, thats nice. id like to see some more compairison to afr getting these on the dyno, as well as a price.
Originally Posted by JnJSpdShop
Do you use the SF600, 1020 or something different? Also what about the exhaust numbers?
Originally Posted by jrp
you have any pics of the heads brian, and what springs are they using?
Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
also what is the p-v clearance vs afr 205 heads?
Originally Posted by Full-Force
Do you know what the combustion chamber and intake runner volume is?
Originally Posted by Gary Z
There's more to heads than flow. I am concerned that relocating the spark plug might have adversely affected the extraordinary Gen III combustion chamber.
Originally Posted by gomer
You need to send me a set of those bitches down here for some dyno testing 
Originally Posted by Hardtop
Nice. I would like to see a same bench comparison to the ETP 215's.
Bruce
Bruce
11-03-2005, 07:47 PM
#30
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
Engine dyno numbers coming soon, what cam would you like to see used?
11-03-2005, 09:52 PM
#34
Originally Posted by strokedls1
I was thinking something midrange like a F13. Thanks for sharing the flow data. Interested to see the power difference on the dyno.
11-03-2005, 10:15 PM
#35
Since the heads flow so well I think it would be nice to see results with one of the bigger cams as well, such as a T-Rex, or one of the G5X cams. Any idea on if the CFM keeps rising past .600 lift, or is 325 the highest it reaches?
Will TEA be porting LSX manifolds port match them to these heads?
Will TEA be porting LSX manifolds port match them to these heads?
Last edited by Jimmy P; 11-03-2005 at 10:26 PM.
11-04-2005, 12:30 AM
#38
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 66deuce
i know i'm going to be in the minority,but something small.like a TR224.
11-04-2005, 07:07 AM
#39
Hell, I'd like to see you start small (like the venerable 216/220) for us guys that just want a nice, friendly street car. Nothing all out, but with great all around power...plus it would showcase what you can do with a lower lift cam since these heads flow well down low.
