2.02/1.57 vs stock valves???? is it worth it on cam only car?
12-21-2005, 11:01 AM
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.02/1.57 vs stock valves???? is it worth it on cam only car? im porting a extra set of stock 241 castings.. come to find the person i got them from put some "350" 1.85/something smaller valves in a few of the things.. well i dont think he did but rather who he got them from. at any rate, this has me pm'ing gunnar@patriot, and now asking ya'll will it be worth it???
i have the f14 cam, 232/234.. just seems like 2.0 vs 2.02 isn't a whole lot ya know?!?! with a good vavle job and those larger valves will i pick up much over the stockers?
i have the f14 cam, 232/234.. just seems like 2.0 vs 2.02 isn't a whole lot ya know?!?! with a good vavle job and those larger valves will i pick up much over the stockers?
12-21-2005, 12:00 PM
#2
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: simpsonville sc
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remember Pi R squared JP
Remember the area is equal to the Radius of the valves squared, that means a little goes a longer way than you would normally think. A 2.02 intake valve would have a 3% increase in area not to mention slightly better flow charateristics around the larger diameter arc.
Engineer
Remember the area is equal to the Radius of the valves squared, that means a little goes a longer way than you would normally think. A 2.02 intake valve would have a 3% increase in area not to mention slightly better flow charateristics around the larger diameter arc.
Engineer
